Skip to item: of 4
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

'British interests on the coast of Arabia, Koweit, Bahrein and El Katr' [‎2v] (4/4)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 2 folios. It was created in 30 Jan 1905. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

desirous that a treaty should be made in anticipation of the death of Sheikh
Jasim. An opportunity of making such a treaty arose last year, when the
Turks disturbed the status quo by appointing officials to various places on
the coast, and when the Government of India proposed that a treaty should
be entered into with Sheikh Ahmed on the lines of our treaties with Bahrein
and the Trucial Chiefs, by which he would be debarred from dealings with
Foreign Powers, and from parling with territory to others than the British
Government. The Turks, however, withdrew their interloping officials in
deference to our remonstrances; and the Government of India were
instructed to report whether the objects to be gained by a treaty were of
such urgent importance as to justify immediate action in spite of the diffi
culties which such action w r ould create with the Turks. The Government of
India replied, in their telegram of the 30th December, by proposing the
immediate conclusion with Sheikh Ahmed of a treaty similar to that of 186S,
which would bind him to take no hostile action by sea, and to refer all
disputes to the Resident in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. .
The reasons in favour of the immediate conclusion of a treaty are—
(1.) The Katr coast, lying as it does between Bahrein and the Pirate
coast, constitutes a break in the continuity of our maritime
influence.
(2.) The absence of a treaty may hinder His Majesty's ships in the work
of suppressing piracy and maintaining the peace of the Gulf.
In this connection it may be observed that the objection to the
extension of Turkish authority in those regions is that the Turks
cannot establish a strong administration, and that their attempt
to rule El Katr might only end in anarchy. Bahrein, as the
centre of the pearl fisheries, attracts pirates.
(3.) The absence of a treaty considerably increases the difficulty of
making arrangements to protect the pearl fisheries from outside
interference which has been threatened by certain Frenchmen
settled in Bahrein. The question of what powers we possess in
this respect under our existing treaties with the local Sheikhs is
under the consideration of the Law Officers of the Crown.
(4.) The absence of a treaty may encourage the Turks to set up a rival
Sheikh to Sheikh Ahmed on the death of Sheikh Jasim. In this
connection it may be observed that Sheikh Ahmed and the Arabs
of El Katr are Wahabis, and presumably sympathise with Ibn,
Saoud m his attack on Turkish authority in the interior. It
is thus of importance to them that the new Sheikh should be on
their side against Ibn Saoud.
From the point of view of the Government of India, the balance of
advantage seems to lie on the s : de of a treaty with Sheikh Ahmed; and it
has been suggested that, as any treaty with him will raise a difficulty with
the Turks, if there is to be a treaty, it should be on the lines of those with
the Trucial Chiefs.
On the other hand, if we make a treaty it will be incumbent on us to
support Sheikh Ahmed if, on the death of Sheikh Jasim, he becomes
embroiled with the Turks, and a fresh chapter of difficulties with the Porte
may be opened. To leave the situation in El Katr to work itself out
without interlerence on our part, even though the ultimate result may be
the restoration of a nominal Turkish sovereignty, would not be inconsistent
with the policy laid down in Lord Lansdowne's Minute of 21st March 1902,
as to the position at Koweit. Lord Lansdovvne slated that the " be;! rock "
of our policy in the Gulf is that " while w T e do not grudge a debouche for
44 international commerce in the Gulf, and have no wish to make it into a
*' British lake, Ave should resist to the utmost all attempts by other Powers
" to obtain a foothold on its shores for naval or military purposes ....
44 We shall pursue that policy not in virtue of ambiguous understandings
with local Chiels, but as the predominant Power in Southern Persia and
the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. ."
B. Ejtchie.
30th January 1905.

About this item

Content

Richmond Thackeray Willoughby Ritchie, British Interests on the Coast of Arabia, Koweit, Bahrein, and El Katr (Government of India, 1905).

This document consists of an analysis of British interests on the coast of Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain and Qatar. It was written by Richmond Thackeray Willoughby Ritchie and published in 1905. It is composed of four sections dealing with the Arabian coast of the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. , Kuwait, Bahrain and Qatar.

Arabian coast. This cites a letter, 5th January 1903, from the Government of India to the Naval Commander-in-Chief, noting it gives a concise overview of 'the political geography of the Arabian coast of the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. ': the claims to rule by the Ottomans, Trucial Chiefs and the Sultan of Muscat. It then reviews key treaties with the Sheikhs of Kuwait (23rd January, 1899) , Bahrain, Trucial Chiefs, the 1891 treaty with Muscat, and the agreements with Shaikhs down the coast to Aden.

Kuwait. This section discusses two issues with the Turks at Kuwait. Firstly, the status of the British Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. , Major Stuart George Knox and his instructions concerning the conflicts and dynamics between Ibn Saud, Ibn Rashid and the Turks. The second issue concerns rights over Bubian Island.

Bahrain. This section discusses British non-recognition of Turkish authority in Bahrain and measures to assert British authority there, referring to reports by Sir Nicholas Roderick O'Conor.

Qatar. This section discusses Turkish influence in Qatar and the reasons why the conclusions of a treaty with the the ruling Al Thani shaikh by the Government of India would be desirable.

Extent and format
2 folios
Arrangement

The document consists four sections: Arabian coast of the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. , Kuwait, Bahrain and Qatar.

Physical characteristics

The foliation sequence is circled in pencil, in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. of each folio. It begins on the first folio, on number 1, and ends on the last folio, on number 2.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

'British interests on the coast of Arabia, Koweit, Bahrein and El Katr' [‎2v] (4/4), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/18/B151, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100023462313.0x000005> [accessed 29 March 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023462313.0x000005">'British interests on the coast of Arabia, Koweit, Bahrein and El Katr' [&lrm;2v] (4/4)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023462313.0x000005">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000833.0x0001a8/IOR_L_PS_18_B151_0004.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000833.0x0001a8/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image