Skip to item: of 478
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

'File 19/191 I (C 27) Bahrain, Persian Claim To' [‎10r] (28/478)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 volume (235 folios). It was created in 20 May 1927-17 Nov 1928. It was written in English, Arabic and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

13
with the sheikh, and accordingly one was appointed in 1904. From this date our
interest in internal matters increased. During the five years of the war no action
was taken, but in 1919, probably owing to the treatment of the Shiahs having
provoked a protest in Tehran, our immediate interest in the misrule of the State
became very much greater, and on our finding Sheikh Isa entirely obstructive he was
removed from active control, his son Hamad acting as his deputy.
With this short summary T will come to details.
4. In 1880 the sheikh entered into closer relationship with the British by a
treaty in which was included a provision by which he agreed to have no negotiations
with foreign countries, and in 1892 he made a further and more extended treaty in
which he stated he would cede no territory to foreign countries.
The protection given by Great Britain to Bahrein resulted in a considerable
increase of material prosperity, and our interest, our influence being more and more
powerful, was turned to internal improvement and reform, and to precautions
against political competition on the part of European Powers.
5. In 1899 differences came to light between Sheikh Isa and his nephew,
Ali-bin-Ahmad, son of the Sheikh Ahmad mentioned in paragraph 2, and supplied
a possible explanation for the anxiety which Sheikh Isa had displayed to have his
son Hamad recognised by the British Government as his heir.
Sanction to this recognition—and it is illuminating that such sanction was
considered by the sheikh necessary—was granted in 1898, but it was not actually
openly announced until 1901, owing to the obstruction by the sheikh to the reform of
his customs, from which he was not receiving the value he should have received, the
profits going mainly to the customs farmers.
6. In 1899 the British Government offered to lend the sheikh a British customs
official, but he declined the offer, the reason being, apparently, that he considered his
dignity and independence would be compromised.
In the same year, in violation of a promise that he would not extend the current
customs contract without reference to the British Resident, Sheikh Isa granted a
new lease for two years, and enhanced the general rate of duty from 4 to 5 per cent.,
without giving previous notice to the British authorities.
7. It was felt that the time had come to replace the Indian agent, who had
existed since 1829, by an European officer, and in January 1900 an uncovenanted
officer of the Bushire Residency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, established in the provinces and regions considered part of, or under the influence of, British India. was appointed. In earlier days an Assistant
Resident from Bushire had been sent occasionally to reside in the island.
8. The question of the customs was allowed to rest until Lord Curzon's visit to
the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. in 1903, when it formed the chief subject of discussion between His
Excellency the Viceroy and the sheikh.
Lord Curzon pressed the customs reforms on the sheikh, but the latter main
tained that is was a matter which concerned himself , and there is little doubt that
he considered the matter as one affecting his independence. Lord Curzon, however,
gave him a final warning that the matter could not, and would not, be dropped.
It may be said that in 1901 Sir N. O'Conor had recommended the appointment
of a British Director of Customs as a measure which would appear to the Turks a
material proof of British authority in Bahrein.
To coerce Sheikh Isa into acceptance of reforms would have been easy, but it was
thought better that he should consent of his own will.
9. In 1904, after the failure of various attempts to induce the sheikh to agree
to a reform of his Customs Administration, a further enhancement of the status of
the British representative in the islands was approved of, and in October 1904 a
political agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. was appointed from the cadre of the Indian Political Department.
Lord Curzon had felt, while at Bahrein, that an uncovenanted officer, hailing from
India, did not carry the necessary weight with the Sheikh of Bahrein, and it was
hoped that a British officer would obtain more influence.
10. Sheikh Isa's conduct, however, left much to be desired, and he seemed
more concerned with preserving his independence from us than with conciliating us,
by whom only his independence could be maintained.
11. In November 1904 a riot had occurred in which the bodyguard of the
sheikh's nephew All attacked the Persians resident in the bazaar at Manameh, the
capital of the islands. Captain Prideaux, the new political agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. , interviewed the
sheikh in the matter, but the sheikh, on the ground that the Persians were
Mahometans, declined to admit his interference, and expressed his intention of
sending the case to Shara. Ultimately the matter was kept pending until the arrival
of the Resident. In the meantime the Persian sufferers had telegraphed to the Shah

About this item

Content

This file contains correspondence between British officials in Bushire, Bahrain and India regarding the Persian government's claim of sovereignty over the island of Bahrain. The broader historical context of Persia's claim to the territory is outlined in detail in the documents.

The likelihood of the Persian claim being taken to the League of Nations is discussed as is the alleged role of Russian support in encouraging the Persian government to push their claim.

Correspondence regarding Persian 'agitation' and propaganda efforts on the island are also contained in the file, including a translation of an article published in a Persian newspaper criticising Britain and supporting the Persian goverment's claim to Bahrain.

Extent and format
1 volume (235 folios)
Arrangement

File is arranged in chronological order, from earliest at beginning of the file to most recent at end.

An index of topics covered in the file is contained on folio 2 and uses the uncircled foliation system.

Physical characteristics

Originally a bound correspondence volume, the file's sheets have been unbound and are now loose. Foliation starts on first page with writing (2nd folio in volume). Small encircled numbers in pencil on top right corner of recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. . Correspondence in Arabic (f.185-f.187) is foliated on verso The back of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'v'. . There are two foliation errors: f.108A and f.108B; f.198A and f.198B.The 4 blank pages after f.223 are not foliated. Additional pagination starts with page 1 on f.4. In this system, only pages with writing are counted.

Written in
English, Arabic and French in Latin and Arabic script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

'File 19/191 I (C 27) Bahrain, Persian Claim To' [‎10r] (28/478), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/R/15/1/356, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100023510720.0x00001d> [accessed 18 April 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023510720.0x00001d">'File 19/191 I (C 27) Bahrain, Persian Claim To' [&lrm;10r] (28/478)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023510720.0x00001d">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000193.0x000149/IOR_R_15_1_356_0028.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000193.0x000149/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image