Skip to item: of 8
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

Letter from Louis Mallet, Under-Secretary of State for India, to Robert Bourke, Under-Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs [‎146r] (4/8)

The record is made up of 1 file (3 folios). It was created in 17 Sep 1879. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

(i
the Tm-V?.i r' auth0nt y alld responsibility of
f nmrJ»t tv, r I ,1 - lei would b8 recognized as
mplete within certain territorial limits to be fixed
tt limit?' a W0Uld be Wh0lly disallowe(i %ond
The limit of Ottoman jurisdiction along tbe
coast, if it is to be defined at all, could scarcely be
fixed at any point north of Ojair, which is opposite
the southern extremity of the island of Bahrein;
but it is precisely between that spot and Kateef
tliat, smce the settlement of the Beni Yas at Odeid
was broken up in 1878, the operations of the
piratical tribes have been carried on with almost
complete impunity. Upon this point Lord Cran-
brook would invite Lord Salisbury s attention to
Colone l Ross s letter of the 8th JVIayj enclosed in
Government of India Despatch, No, 91, of the
28th July last, which was communicated to the
Foreign Office on the 6th instant.
His Lordship apprehends that the effect of formally
recognizing any particular part of the Arab coast
and the waters adjacent as Turkish, and as, in con
sequence, closed against British cruisers, so far as
action against piratical craft is concerned, would be
the formation of an asylum which would be taken
advantage of by marauders in general, whom the
local Ottoman authorities would be unable to
control without a considerable and permanent in
crease to the Turkish naval force in the Gulf, which
the Porte has declared itself precluded from making
by considerations of expense, and which would be
open to many objections on political grounds.
The conclusion, therefore, to which Lord Cran-
brook is led is that negotiation or discussion with
the Porte on the territorial question should be
avoided; but that, in order that the obligations
contracted by the Government of India towards the
Sheikh of Bahrein and the parties to the maritime
truce may be efficiently fulfilled, the Resident in
the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. should be authorized to adopt all
necessary measures for the preservation of the
peace of the seas, without regard either to Turkish
pretensions to sovereignty over the whole Arab coast,
or to the recognition of Ottoman supremacy by in
dividual Chiefs such as the Sheikh of El Bidaa, or
to the presence of Turkish officials at isolated
points.
It seems to Lord Cranbrook that Her Majesty's
Government have a right to regard the fact of
particular ports being used as bases for piratical
attacks, and certain tribes being engaged in those
attacks, as primdfacie evidence that such ports,
and such tribes are not under the effective- control
of the Ottoman Government, and that they would
be justified in issuing instructions to their officers
in accordance with this view. _
Lord Cranbrook is further of opinion that,
bavin 0 ' regard to the repeated assurances given b}
the Turkish Government in 1871-72, at the time
of the operations in Nejd, that no interterence wit
the littoral tribes was intended, and to the as otten
3122, A 2
m
14-2.

About this item

Content

The letter outlines the opinion of the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. that no negotiations should be opened with the Turkish authorities over more clearly defined areas of jurisdiction and responsibility for the two powers along the southern coast of the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. . It is argued that Britain should maintain their commitments to the Trucial chiefs and the rulers of Bahrein [Bahrain] and Muscat, along with their security responsibilities on the Gulf seas, and if the Ottoman Turks do not impinge on these arrangements little communication with the Porte is deemed necessary. The argument is supported by an overview and discussion of the current situation in the region.

Extent and format
1 file (3 folios)
Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation for this description commences at folio 145 and terminates at folio 147, as it is part of a larger physical volume; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. The main foliation sequence commences at the front cover, and terminates at the back cover; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.

Pagination: The volume also contains an original printed pagination sequence.

Condition: folio 145 is torn along one edge, with the loss of some text.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

Letter from Louis Mallet, Under-Secretary of State for India, to Robert Bourke, Under-Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs [‎146r] (4/8), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/18/B19/1a, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100023557934.0x000006> [accessed 24 April 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023557934.0x000006">Letter from Louis Mallet, Under-Secretary of State for India, to Robert Bourke, Under-Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs [&lrm;146r] (4/8)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023557934.0x000006">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000788.0x0003db/IOR_L_PS_18_B19_1A_0005.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000788.0x0003db/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image