Skip to item: of 8
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

'THE WAR WITH TURKEY. Memorandum by Political Department, India Office.' [‎52v] (4/8)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 4 folios. It was created in 20 Jun 1916. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

4
to l)e reckoned with that the educated Hindus, though tliey have thrown
in their lot with us, are not averse to seeing British pride humbled, and
humbled by an Asiatic Tower—and to convince the peoples of India' that
a handful of white men can still control them, a task which will not have
been rendered easier by indiscriminate eulogy of the exploits of the Indian
troops in France. In the regions adjoining India, where for a variety of
reasons the military prestige of Great Britain had sullered serious eclipse
in the 10 years preceding the war, we shall have to rehabilitate it. To
restore order on the frontier and maintain tolerable relations with Afghanistan •
to conduct the business of everyday life in Persia; to keep order in the
Gulf and control those Aral) chiefs with whom we already have relations
and to whose number the very important Amir of Xejd lias recently been
added ; and finally, if it should so turn out, to develop the resources of
Mesopotamia: in all of which regions the Islamic self-consciousness will
have been intensitied. The Arabian policy of His Majesty's Government, so
far from diminishing the didiculty of these tasks, will add to it, unless
Turkey has been decisively defeated—and defeated by us, not merelv by
Russians or French. For while the Arabs are content to use us now for
their own ends, it is certain that if and when those ends are attained their
attitude will always be less antagonistic towards the Moslem Turk,
whatever their grievances against him in the past, than towards the
Christian; and if the former is believed to be the better soldier they will
play him off against us to their heart's content. Indeed, the policv of
fanning the Arab nationalist spirit to a flame is, as far as eastern Arabia
and Xejd are concerned, a two-edged weapon of a verv dangerous
description—innocuous only if the Turk is beaten in the field, but otherwise
likely e\entuall\ to lesult in acute antagonism between the Arabs and
ourselves.
Nor will our difficulties end there. For we shall have to face in the Far
East the ambitions and claims ot a highly aggressive Japan, who will
reckon thus|he Japanese have beaten the liussians, the Russians have
beaten the lurks, the 1 urks have beaten the British ; erno. \
line of argument which will not be the less convincing to them if— as is
presumably quite possible-the war ends without the British fleet having
battle 11 0pp iinity demonstrating its superiority to the German fleet in
If this prognosis is sound, then—unless we are content prop/<??• vilam viveudi
pc.rdcie eausas, or until we are m the last ditch—there can be no short
cut to peace with lurkey. The war with Turkev was thrust udoii us
precisely because the Germans realised its vital iinportance to us and we
grief if vve attach ,eso in wi,ce
resumfoperaTions on"u ^argu-lc'l'le''it,''\| ''7°™* l08t gr0l,,ld . aud U ]
weather uermits -mrl fn i • ' Mtsopotanua, as soon as the cool
Purely militarv considpr-1" X ^ I1 r I' 1 e l )aratl0Ils to that end without delay.
ment, but it mav be pointed out 'hat'it^'- r'' 0 C0 ' 1 '.P etel l ce of this Depart-
that His Majesty's Goverunient n 1 I l>"rely military considerations
against the Turk, and that the success oftln!; 0 ?' r U ) r - ,SU ^ i''® ^
by our failure in Egypt at Aden f vl poll . cy 13 being endangered
military strength necessary in order to L 10 the <l,8 P la ' V of
them when in motion ; with the r,.s„lt il 11 ® Aral) ® 111 motion, or to support
that the Turks, who appear to llv 'T 18 " 0W cou «derab]e risk
buy the Arabs bv oftenu -- then. • t clushed J the movement in Syria, will
that Turco-Arab bloc which the miilHi 0 " 0 '^ • hat i We sllaI1 ^ fi ' Ce(i "' itl1
so greatly add to their difficulties" in t utl ' 0 " tles last year declared would
therefore that they were right in dipt, ' I elsewhere. Supposing
cogent nature for early action ' . there are military reasons of a
In the meantime all tenrntqtmn
firmly resisted. That temnt'itiV * <l I )roniature peace with Turkey must be
wTk ,rp7rLb.Y b :r" , ' te ' l :°■
opposition party, may ofter terms 1/ ( - 1 Jn ^ nrkey, or some other
any Turkish party could + ]S ' vevei '» a^nost inconceivable that
consent to part with Constantinople or Syria on

About this item

Content

Memorandum, written by Sir Frederic Arthur Hirtzel, dated 25 May 1916, examining the implications of war with Turkey on Great Britain particularly the importance to Germany of a Turco-Ottoman alliance and the integrity of the Ottoman Empire, and the corresponding importance of its dissolution to Great Britain.

The memorandum discusses Germany's need for raw materials and its realisation that supplies from Asiatic Turkey may take years to establish; the German threat to the Suez Canal and the Dardanelles; the threat to India from Mesopotamia; the dangers of Pan-islamism; the potential risks of waging war on a Moslem [Muslim] power, particularly given British relations in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. ; and the possible outcomes of the war with Germany and the likely position of Turkey in relation to them.

Enclosed with the memorandum are two appendices:

  • Appendix I: Extract from an article by Dr Hans Delbrück in the Schwäbische Merkur 17 May 1916, summarising the German ideal of 'weltpolitik' (world policy);
  • Appendix II: Extract memorandum by Sir Mark Sykes on "The problem of the Near East", dated 20 June 1916.

Sir Frederic Arthur Hirtzel is not named on the memorandum as its author, however IOR/L/PS/18/B234 refers to him as its author.

Extent and format
4 folios
Physical characteristics

Foliation: The foliation for this description commences at folio 51 and terminates at folio 54, as it is part of a larger physical volume; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. An additional foliation sequence is also present in the volume; these numbers are also written in pencil, but are not circled, and can be found in the same position as the main sequence.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

'THE WAR WITH TURKEY. Memorandum by Political Department, India Office.' [‎52v] (4/8), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/18/B233, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100023622456.0x000005> [accessed 18 April 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023622456.0x000005">'THE WAR WITH TURKEY. Memorandum by Political Department, India Office.' [&lrm;52v] (4/8)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023622456.0x000005">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000833.0x00025b/IOR_L_PS_18_B233_0004.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000833.0x00025b/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image