![‘Memorandum respecting the frontier between Mohammerah and Turkey.’ [‎31v] (62/82)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000833.0x000376/IOR_L_PS_18_B380_0062.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg "‘Memorandum respecting the frontier between Mohammerah and Turkey.’ [‎31v] (62/82)")
‘Memorandum respecting the frontier between Mohammerah and Turkey.’ [31v] (62/82)
The record is made up of 1 file (41 folios, 5 maps). It was created in 3 Apr 1912. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
52
APPENDIX (C).
Extract from " Layard's Early Adventures," Vol. 2, pp. 431-439.
[Edition published in London in 1887.]
SOON after my return to Constantinople from my mission to the Western
Provinces of European Turkey, the joint mediation offered by the English and Russian
Governments to Turkey and Persia to prevent a war, which was then on the point
of breaking out between them, was accepted by the two Powers. Sir Stratford Canning
was thus able to carry out his intention of availing himself of the knowledge I had
acquired during my travels in Mesopotamia and Khuzistan, and to employ me in
the correspondence and negotiations which took place. The principal matters in
dispute were certain parts of the frontiers between the two States. Persia claimed
the left bank of the Shatt-el-Arab, or united waters of the Tigris and Euphrates, from
about sixty miles of their junction with the
Persian Gulf
The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran.
, and certain districts in
the mountains of Kurdistan, which had been seized by the Turks. Since the
Matamet's expedition against the sheikh of the Chaab Arabs, who had given an
asylum to Mehemet Taki Khan, the Persians had occupied Mohammerah and some
territory to the north of that town. This territory was claimed by the Porte, and
as the Shah refused to withdraw his troops from it, the Porte was about to have
recourse to Avar to enforce its claims. It ^vas already fitting out an expedition for
the purpose.
It was necessary for the representatives of the mediating Powers at Constantinople
to make a careful investigation into the claims of the contending parties, and to propose
to them for their acceptance a fair and equitable arrangement founded upon their
respective rights and interests. Sir Stratford Canning entrusted me with this duty on
his part. I had to examine the evidence furnished by the Porte and the Persian
Government in proof of their respective pretensions, consisting of a mass of documents,
maps and surveys, many o£ them of ancient date, and to prepare a scheme for the
settlement of the matters in dispute, to be submitted to the British and Russian
Governments for their approval before being presented to the two Powers.
I took great interest in the work, which was very congenial to my tastes. The
knowledge which I had acquired of the territory in dispute, and of the history and
traditions of the tribes which inhabited it, proved of much use to me. I was able to
prepare^a project of settlement which appeared to me just to both parties, and warranted
by the proofs which they had produced in support of their respective claims. It was
entirely approved by Sir Stratford Canning, and sent by him to Lord Aberdeen, to be
communicated to the Russian Government.* He fully expected that he would speedily
receive authority to submit it to the Porte for its acceptance. The result of my
examination of the evidence and maps furnished me was that the claims of Turkey to
the left bank of the Shatt-el-Arab and to Mohammerah were well-founded. Persia had
never exercised more than a nominal jurisdiction over the territory in dispute, the
right to which had always been asserted by the Porte. The Arab tribes which inhabited
it, and which were semi-independent, had, however, acknowledged at one time the
supremacy of the Sultan, and at another that of the Shah. The question was further
complicated by the change which had taken place in the lower part of the course of the
Karun. In the early part of this century, as may be seen by maps of the time, this
river discharged itself into the
Persian Gulf
The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran.
by more than one outlet, the principal of
which was known as t he Bamishere. As it rose in the mountains of Luristan,
and the whole of its course was through Persian territory, it was unquestionably a
Persian river, and Persia had undoubted claims to the lands on both its banks.
But a canal had been cut to unite this river and the Shatt-el-Arab, known as the
Haffar, a name which denoted its artificial origin, and upon its banks Mohammerah
had been built by the sheikh of the Chaab Arabs. In the course of time the waters of
the Karun had enlarged this canal, and through it the main body of the river was
* Sir Stratford Canning No. 70, April 27, 1844.
About this item
- Content
The memorandum concerns the border between Mohammerah [Khorramshahr] and Turkey, and was prepared by Alwyn Parker of the Foreign Office. There are a number of labels at the top of the first page: ‘Persia’, ‘Confidential’ and ‘Section 10’. The memorandum sections are as follows:
- Part I. A preface (folios 1-5), introducing the points at issue, with two maps, the first being a sketch map of the Mohammerah district, with the proposed Turkish, Persian and mediating commissioner’s lines indicated (folio 2), and a map compiled from plane table surveys by Lieutenant Arnold Talbot Wilson in 1909, with the frontier as defined by the mediating commissioners in 1850 (folio 4);
- Part II. An historical summary (folios 6-19) of British Government correspondence relating to the border dispute, with the chief focus being on correspondence exchanged during the period 1843-52, around the time of the Treaty of Erzeroum (c.1848). This part contains two copies of a map, a facsimile of a diagram of the disputed area, the original of which was enclosed by Colonel Williams in his despatch of 4 February 1850, indicating Turkish and Persian claims and the mediating commissioner’s proposal (folios 15, 19);
- Part III. Conclusion (folios 20-28), with a further map (folio 23), an exact copy of that found on folio 4.
The appendices that follow are:
- A: British assurances given to the Shaikh of Mohammerah, 1899 and 1902-10;
- B. Protocol of December 1911 (in French) for the proposal settlement of the Turco-Persian frontier question;
- C. An extract from Sir Austen Henry Layard’s Early Adventures in Persia, Susiana, and Babylonia , published in 1887. The extract is from volume 2, pp 431-439;
- D. Rough notes made by General William Monteith when in Persia, on the frontier of Turkey and Persia, as communicated to the Foreign Office in 1843;
- E. Observations by Sir Henry Rawlinson on a Persian memorandum relative to the situation of the cities of Mohammerah and Fellahiah [Fallāḥīyah], 1844;
- F. Text of the Treaty of Erzeroum, 31 May 1847, in English and French translation;
- G. Copy of a despatch from Sir Stratford Canning, the British Ambassador to Istanbul, to Lord Palmerston, Foreign Secretary, dated 30 May 1850;
- H. Copy of a despatch from Lord Palmerston to Lord Broomfield, dated 12 July 1850.
- Extent and format
- 1 file (41 folios, 5 maps)
- Arrangement
The memorandum is arranged into three parts, labelled I, II and III, which are followed by eight lettered appendices, A-H. Historic correspondence referred to in the memorandum is referenced in the inside page margin.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: The foliation sequence commences at the first folio and terminates at the last folio; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
Pagination: The booklet contains an original typed pagination sequence.
- Written in
- English and French in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
‘Memorandum respecting the frontier between Mohammerah and Turkey.’ [31v] (62/82), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/18/B380, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100024051501.0x00003f> [accessed 18 April 2024]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100024051501.0x00003f
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100024051501.0x00003f">‘Memorandum respecting the frontier between Mohammerah and Turkey.’ [‎31v] (62/82)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100024051501.0x00003f"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000833.0x000376/IOR_L_PS_18_B380_0062.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000833.0x000376/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- IOR/L/PS/18/B380
- Title
- ‘Memorandum respecting the frontier between Mohammerah and Turkey.’
- Pages
- 31v:32v
- Author
- Layard, Sir Austen Henry
- Usage terms
- Public Domain