Skip to item: of 156
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

'Persia' [‎21v] (42/156)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 file (78 folios). It was created in 1 Dec 1879. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

I
40
“ taking or encouraging any hostile demonstration
“ against the territory of the Heratee ruler
adding, however, that it was the desire of Her
Majesty’s Government to abstain from all inter
ference in the affairs of Afghanistan, and that they
did not contemplate any step being taken beyond
friendly advice if an opportunity should occur when
it might be given without the risk of giving offence
to the rulers of the country.
But, on the 3rd June 1862, more positive in
structions were sent, and the Governor General
was requested, u with advertence to the terms of
the Treaty of Paris,” to take any steps to dissuade
« the Cabul Sirdars Leader of a tribe or a polity; also refers to a military rank or title given to a commander of an army or division. ” from hostile demonstrations
against Herat that might be called tor by the cir-
cum stances of the case, and the position of affairs
upon receipt of the Despatch.
Nevertheless, on the 18th August 1862, the
Foreign Office were informed* that Sir C. IVbod
saw no reason for believing that Dost Mahomed
contemplated any aggressive operations against
Persia; that the strife, so far, was between two
Afghan principalities, and that neither the British
nor the Persian Government was justified in inter
fering so long as the war was confined to Afghan,
territorv; and again, on the 24th Septemb<* 1862,f
that Sir C. Wood did not see, in the apprehensions
of the Shah that Herat might fall to the beseiging
force of the Ameer, any reason for modifying his
opinion as to the inexpediency of interference in
the internal affairs of the Afghan States.
The view finally taken by the Foreign Office,
then presided over by Earl Russell, was in accord
ance with the above, and was explained in a De
spatch;!; to Mr. Alison, Minister at Teheran, dated
the 14th August 1862, which, as the question of P 1
the obligations of the British Government under
the Treaty of 1857 has been not unfrequently
raised, is worth quoting at length. Lord Russell
wrote :—
“ I have anxiously examined the Treaty of Paris
of 1857, in order to ascertain the precise engage
ments of Her Majesty in regard to the affairs of
Afghanistan.
“ I find those engagements contained in Articles 6
and 7 of the Treaty of 1857.
“ By the 6th Article, His Majesty the Shah of
Persia* relinquishes all claims to sovereignty over
Herat, promises to recognize the independence of
Herat and of the whole of Afghanistan, and never
to attempt any interference with the independence
of Afghanistan or in the internal affairs of those
States. The Shah promises further, in case of dif
ferences arising between the Government of Persia
and the countries of Herat and Afghanistan,
« to refer them for adjustment to the friendly
« offices of the British Government, and not to
4 take up arms unless those friendly offices fail of
4 effect.’
44 The British Government, on their side, engage
at all times to exert their influence with the States
• Secret Home Correspondence, Vol. 56*
p. 745.
f Secret Correspondence, Voi. 56, p. 771.
t Secret Home Correspondence, Vol. 56,
401.

About this item

Content

The memorandum is divided into the following chapter headings:

  • 'General Status of Persia', ff 2r-12;
  • 'Persia and Herat', ff 12v-24r;
  • 'Persia and Seistan [Sīstān]', ff 24r-31v;
  • 'Persia and Kohuk', ff 31v-35;
  • 'Persia and the Navigation of the Karun [Kārūn] River', ff 35v-39r;
  • 'Persia and her integrity', ff 39r-47;
  • 'Persia and Merv', ff 47v-52v;
  • 'Continuation of General Status of Persia', ff 52v-61;
  • 'Appendices', ff 63-78.

'General Status of Persia' provides a geographic description of the Kingdom including details of its boundaries, rivers, and transportation links. It also includes an outline of its demography, and its revenue by province. Military matters are also covered in this section; this includes an in-depth look at the Persian army — its pay and composition — and a look at the employment of British officers in Persia. This section concludes with a narrative of Persia's modern history from the sixteenth century.

'Persia and Herat' describes the extent to which the province's boundaries can be defined, and provides a brief description of each district within; Ghorian, Sabzawar, Farah, Bakwa, Kurak, and Obeh. It also includes a description of the town of Herat, and information on the province's demography and climate. The section also provides detailed coverage of the tribes in the region. The development of British policy towards Herat is explained through the use of select correspondence. This includes the relative merits for Britain in either maintaining Herat's independence, or supporting Afghan or Persian rule; extensive reference is made to the Treaty of Paris (1857).

'Persia and Seistan' also provides a geographic description of the province, along with information on its administrative divisions, climate, and transportation links. Its main purpose however is to outline the development of British attitudes concerning the governance of this province; should it be overseen by Afghanistan or Persia? To provide context, it covers the historical basis for the two competing claims. It concludes by describing the British arbitration of the matter in 1871-72 by General Frederick John Goldsmid, and its outcome; summaries of the statements provided by the Afghan and Persian sides are included.

'Persia and Kohuk' explains how Persia has disputed the award of this province to Khelat by General Goldsmid in 1871, and British reluctance to amend the award in favour of Persia.

'Persia and the Navigation of the Karun River' outlines British efforts to open up the Karun River for steam navigation. It explains that Russian success in improving transportation infrastructure in the north of Persia — in contrast to British failure in the south — is seen to be putting British trade at a disadvantage; the Karun River is seen as having the best potential for resolving this. The prospects for the construction of a railway in southern Persia are also briefly examined.

'Persia and her integrity' details the development of a diplomatic understanding from 1834 between Britain and Russia, in which both powers established their mutual interest in the maintenance of the territorial integrity of Persia. It chiefly concerns British suspicions that Russian activities in central Asia do not match their professed intentions towards Persia (i.e. British fears that Russia is encroaching on central Asia).

'Persia and Merv', in addition to providing an overview of the region's history and ancient settlements, considers what the British consider to be the encroachment of Russia on Persia's northern borders; the British consider any potential Russian occupation of Merv to be a threat, and it is explained that Persian control is preferred.

'Continuation of General Status of Persia' concentrates on British concerns over increases in Russian influence at the Persian Court in Tehran; the British fear Persia becoming a vassal of Russia and facilitating Russian expansion towards Afghanistan. It therefore discusses the extent to which Britain should take advantage of Persian overtures to establish friendly relations with that power in order to prevent this scenario. It also briefly discusses Persian designs on Bahrain, and the desirability — for Britain — in maintaining its status as an independent state, in addition to emphasizing the need to maintain Britain's protectorate role in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. . Topics also included in this section, but covered in less detail include: the conference of consular powers on the Resident in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. ; the development of telegraph lines in Persia; and negotiations respecting the demarcation of the Persian-Turkish border.

The memorandum is signed by Owen Tudor Burne of the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. .

The appendix at the back is divided eight sections as follows:

  • I. 'Employment of British Officers with the Persian Army', f 63;
  • II. A selection of memoranda (dated 20 July-24 December 1868) concerning the need to strengthen British influence over Persia, and the means available to achieve it, ff 63v-64;
  • III. A selection of memoranda (dated 10-30 October 1868) on the possibility of employing British officers with the Persian Army, f 65;
  • IV. 'The Policy of Great Britain towards Persia, ff 66-69;
  • V. Instructions given to Major-General Sir Henry Creswicke Rawlingson as Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary A diplomatic representative who ranks below an ambassador. The term can be shortened to 'envoy'. to the Court of Persia, dated 4 August 1859, ff 68-69;
  • VI. 'Outline Sketch by Colonel Burne of the Shah of Persia's Visit to England, 1873, ff 69-72;
  • VII. 'Note by Colonel Burne on the Persian Army, 20th December 1871', ff 72-73;
  • VIII. 'Abstract of Events in Persia, Afghanistan, &c. from 1722 to the present period', ff 73v-78.
Extent and format
1 file (78 folios)
Arrangement

The file is arranged into eight chapters — outlined in a table of contents on f 1 — with an appendix at the end.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence for this description commences at f 1A and terminates at f 78, as it is part of a larger physical volume; these numbers are written in pencil, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. Pagination: the file also contains an original printed pagination sequence.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

'Persia' [‎21v] (42/156), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/18/C28, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100025538941.0x00002b> [accessed 28 March 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100025538941.0x00002b">'Persia' [&lrm;21v] (42/156)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100025538941.0x00002b">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000833.0x000062/IOR_L_PS_18_C28_0042.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000833.0x000062/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image