Skip to item: of 156
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

'Persia' [‎22v] (44/156)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 file (78 folios). It was created in 1 Dec 1879. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

42
*
subsequent Despatch to Mr. Alison, dated 4th De
cember 1862, in which it was observed :—
“ Her Majesty’s Government can well imagine
that the union of Afghanistan under one ruler may
be a source of apprehension to Persia, but the case
is not contemplated in the Treaty of 1857 between
Great Britain and Persia.”
In order that the British Government might not
appear to countenance the Ameer’s proceedings,
the vakeel of the Government of India was, in
August 1862. directed to withdraw from the Dost’s
camp.* But neither the Lieutenant Governor of
the Punjab (Sir K. Montgomery) nor the Governor
General (Lord Elgin), so far as British interests
were concerned, saw anything “ untoward in the
“ extension of the Ameer’s dominions to the Persian
“ frontier.”
On the 27th May 1863, after a ten months’ siege,
Herat was stormed and taken by the Dost. Thirteen
days later, on the 9th June 1863, the Ameer
died. He was succeeded by his appointed heir,
Shere Ali Khan, to the exclusion of the two
elder sons, Mahomed Afzul and Mahomed Azim
Khan.
The events which followed the accession to power
of Shere Ali Khan may be summarized in a few
words, so far as they relate to Herat or Persia.
Shere Ali at once placed his youngest, Yakoob
Khan, as Governor over Herat. This was followed
by events which showed a great deal of discontent
at Herat against Yakoob Khan’s rule, and evidenced
the desire of the Shah of Persia to turn that dis
content to his own advantage. A Persian Envoyf
reached Cabul in July 1864, and was received with
marked distinction by Shere Ali. The object of
his mission was believed to be the conclusion of a
treaty between the two States, the reciprocal esta
blishment of representatives at either Court, the
recognition of Herat as a Persian dependency, and
the co-operation of the ruler with Persia in over
awing the Turkomans. But nothing came of the
negotiation; the Envoy was finally dismissed by
Shere Ali without any definitive communication to
the Shah, and Herat remained true to Shere Ali’s
cause. Yakoob’s position at Herat was for a long
time a weak one, more especially from the intrigues
with Persia of Shah{ Newaz Khan, son of the
late Buler of Herat, Sultan Ahmed Khan, who had
died suddenly after his defeat in 1863 by Dost
Mahomed. In June 1867, the Shah went to
Meshed, ostensibly to pay his devotions at the
shrine of Eman Beza, but really in the hope of
interfering with advantage in the affairs of Herat.
Yakoob Khan left that city for Meshed to have an
audience of the Shah, but nothing resulted from
the visit except an interchange of presents.
During the period of civil war which raged in
Afghanistan in the first part of Shere Ali’s reign,
the Shah of Persia lost no opportunity of fomenting
the designs he had so much at heart, having
•* Secret Letter, No. 1, dated 2nd Septem
ber 1862.
f Wynne’s Precis of Erents in Afghanistan^
p. 9.
f Note .—In 1867, Shah Newaz Khan’s
intrigues under Persian protection attained
some prominence. He was, at length, how
ever, compelled to fly from Herat, when ho
retreated to Seistan, and allied himself, by
his marriage, with Ahmed Khan, Governor
of Lash Jowain. He remained at Teheran
on a pension of 1,900 tomans 10,000 Persian dinars, or a gold coin of that value. a year till his
death, which took place in the autumn of
1879.

About this item

Content

The memorandum is divided into the following chapter headings:

  • 'General Status of Persia', ff 2r-12;
  • 'Persia and Herat', ff 12v-24r;
  • 'Persia and Seistan [Sīstān]', ff 24r-31v;
  • 'Persia and Kohuk', ff 31v-35;
  • 'Persia and the Navigation of the Karun [Kārūn] River', ff 35v-39r;
  • 'Persia and her integrity', ff 39r-47;
  • 'Persia and Merv', ff 47v-52v;
  • 'Continuation of General Status of Persia', ff 52v-61;
  • 'Appendices', ff 63-78.

'General Status of Persia' provides a geographic description of the Kingdom including details of its boundaries, rivers, and transportation links. It also includes an outline of its demography, and its revenue by province. Military matters are also covered in this section; this includes an in-depth look at the Persian army — its pay and composition — and a look at the employment of British officers in Persia. This section concludes with a narrative of Persia's modern history from the sixteenth century.

'Persia and Herat' describes the extent to which the province's boundaries can be defined, and provides a brief description of each district within; Ghorian, Sabzawar, Farah, Bakwa, Kurak, and Obeh. It also includes a description of the town of Herat, and information on the province's demography and climate. The section also provides detailed coverage of the tribes in the region. The development of British policy towards Herat is explained through the use of select correspondence. This includes the relative merits for Britain in either maintaining Herat's independence, or supporting Afghan or Persian rule; extensive reference is made to the Treaty of Paris (1857).

'Persia and Seistan' also provides a geographic description of the province, along with information on its administrative divisions, climate, and transportation links. Its main purpose however is to outline the development of British attitudes concerning the governance of this province; should it be overseen by Afghanistan or Persia? To provide context, it covers the historical basis for the two competing claims. It concludes by describing the British arbitration of the matter in 1871-72 by General Frederick John Goldsmid, and its outcome; summaries of the statements provided by the Afghan and Persian sides are included.

'Persia and Kohuk' explains how Persia has disputed the award of this province to Khelat by General Goldsmid in 1871, and British reluctance to amend the award in favour of Persia.

'Persia and the Navigation of the Karun River' outlines British efforts to open up the Karun River for steam navigation. It explains that Russian success in improving transportation infrastructure in the north of Persia — in contrast to British failure in the south — is seen to be putting British trade at a disadvantage; the Karun River is seen as having the best potential for resolving this. The prospects for the construction of a railway in southern Persia are also briefly examined.

'Persia and her integrity' details the development of a diplomatic understanding from 1834 between Britain and Russia, in which both powers established their mutual interest in the maintenance of the territorial integrity of Persia. It chiefly concerns British suspicions that Russian activities in central Asia do not match their professed intentions towards Persia (i.e. British fears that Russia is encroaching on central Asia).

'Persia and Merv', in addition to providing an overview of the region's history and ancient settlements, considers what the British consider to be the encroachment of Russia on Persia's northern borders; the British consider any potential Russian occupation of Merv to be a threat, and it is explained that Persian control is preferred.

'Continuation of General Status of Persia' concentrates on British concerns over increases in Russian influence at the Persian Court in Tehran; the British fear Persia becoming a vassal of Russia and facilitating Russian expansion towards Afghanistan. It therefore discusses the extent to which Britain should take advantage of Persian overtures to establish friendly relations with that power in order to prevent this scenario. It also briefly discusses Persian designs on Bahrain, and the desirability — for Britain — in maintaining its status as an independent state, in addition to emphasizing the need to maintain Britain's protectorate role in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. . Topics also included in this section, but covered in less detail include: the conference of consular powers on the Resident in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. ; the development of telegraph lines in Persia; and negotiations respecting the demarcation of the Persian-Turkish border.

The memorandum is signed by Owen Tudor Burne of the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. .

The appendix at the back is divided eight sections as follows:

  • I. 'Employment of British Officers with the Persian Army', f 63;
  • II. A selection of memoranda (dated 20 July-24 December 1868) concerning the need to strengthen British influence over Persia, and the means available to achieve it, ff 63v-64;
  • III. A selection of memoranda (dated 10-30 October 1868) on the possibility of employing British officers with the Persian Army, f 65;
  • IV. 'The Policy of Great Britain towards Persia, ff 66-69;
  • V. Instructions given to Major-General Sir Henry Creswicke Rawlingson as Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary A diplomatic representative who ranks below an ambassador. The term can be shortened to 'envoy'. to the Court of Persia, dated 4 August 1859, ff 68-69;
  • VI. 'Outline Sketch by Colonel Burne of the Shah of Persia's Visit to England, 1873, ff 69-72;
  • VII. 'Note by Colonel Burne on the Persian Army, 20th December 1871', ff 72-73;
  • VIII. 'Abstract of Events in Persia, Afghanistan, &c. from 1722 to the present period', ff 73v-78.
Extent and format
1 file (78 folios)
Arrangement

The file is arranged into eight chapters — outlined in a table of contents on f 1 — with an appendix at the end.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence for this description commences at f 1A and terminates at f 78, as it is part of a larger physical volume; these numbers are written in pencil, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. Pagination: the file also contains an original printed pagination sequence.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

'Persia' [‎22v] (44/156), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/18/C28, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100025538941.0x00002d> [accessed 25 April 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100025538941.0x00002d">'Persia' [&lrm;22v] (44/156)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100025538941.0x00002d">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000833.0x000062/IOR_L_PS_18_C28_0044.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000833.0x000062/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image