Skip to item: of 156
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

'Persia' [‎23v] (46/156)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 file (78 folios). It was created in 1 Dec 1879. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

44
From the year 1867 up to the present time the
question of Persian claims to Herat has practically
remained dormant. The delimitations of the
Seistan boundary, the determination of the British
Government to discourage any renewal of I ersian
encroachment eastwards, and the strong position
held, under British auspices, by Shere Ah, crushed
any hope on the Persian side of successfully revivi
fying the claims of tbe Shah to any part of Afghan
territory.
The recent course of events in Afghanistan,
however, has given the question new life at the
Persian Court.
In an interview in November 1878 between the
Shah and Mr. Thomson,* His Majesty evinced
great curiosity on the subject of the existing Afghan
complications, and hoped that when England had
reduced Afghanistan, she would revert to the old
arrangement, which was equally advantageous to
Persia and to England, of establishing separate
small States at Cabul, Candahar, and Herat.
In a conversationf also with the Secretary of
State for Eoreign Affairs, Malcom Khan averred
that Persia was too weak to remain without a
friend, and that the Shah was anxious to place the
whole of his foreign policy under the guidance of
TWland if Her Majesty’s Government were willing
wte h^ a pledge' of their good will. The policy
pursued by England was, he said, bringing about
the annexation of Merv, a measure which Persia
could prevent with the assistance of England ; the
most obvious mode of rendering such assistance
was by Placing Herat in her hands; there were
other means at hand, notably the provision of
monev to enable Persia to obtain more effective
armaments. In short, said Malcom Khan, this
was the critical moment, the point from which t ic
policy of Persia must definitely turn towards Russia
or England. Whilst Lord Salisbury promised con-
^deration to Malcom Khan’s representations he
reminded the Minister that Herat was regarded by
Indian authorities as a point of great importance
and that they would look with misgiving at the
occupation of it by a power which might not be
able to throw off the control of Russia.
The Persian Eoreign Minister, at the same
time earnestlyt brought the same subject to the
notice of Mr. Ronald Thomson. England had,
he said by the treaty of 1857, obliged Persia to
renounce her rights in Afghanistan and to tem-
torial claim to Herat ; she had aiways felt exas
perated at thus being deprived of Herat by En D land,
and her recent want of cordiality was only to be
attributed to that feeling; if England wanted to
secure Persia in her interests she would do so by
"he cession of Herat; if this were done, Persia
would solemnly bind herself to place her foreign
relations in the hands of England, and to grant
her internal privileges; she would further undei-
take not to allow any Russian agent, or traveller,
* Mr. Thomson, No. 210, of 14th Novem
ber 1878.
f Foreign Office to India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. , No. 1£4,
28th February 1879.
X Mr. R. Thomson, No. 36, of 17th Feb
ruary 1879.

About this item

Content

The memorandum is divided into the following chapter headings:

  • 'General Status of Persia', ff 2r-12;
  • 'Persia and Herat', ff 12v-24r;
  • 'Persia and Seistan [Sīstān]', ff 24r-31v;
  • 'Persia and Kohuk', ff 31v-35;
  • 'Persia and the Navigation of the Karun [Kārūn] River', ff 35v-39r;
  • 'Persia and her integrity', ff 39r-47;
  • 'Persia and Merv', ff 47v-52v;
  • 'Continuation of General Status of Persia', ff 52v-61;
  • 'Appendices', ff 63-78.

'General Status of Persia' provides a geographic description of the Kingdom including details of its boundaries, rivers, and transportation links. It also includes an outline of its demography, and its revenue by province. Military matters are also covered in this section; this includes an in-depth look at the Persian army — its pay and composition — and a look at the employment of British officers in Persia. This section concludes with a narrative of Persia's modern history from the sixteenth century.

'Persia and Herat' describes the extent to which the province's boundaries can be defined, and provides a brief description of each district within; Ghorian, Sabzawar, Farah, Bakwa, Kurak, and Obeh. It also includes a description of the town of Herat, and information on the province's demography and climate. The section also provides detailed coverage of the tribes in the region. The development of British policy towards Herat is explained through the use of select correspondence. This includes the relative merits for Britain in either maintaining Herat's independence, or supporting Afghan or Persian rule; extensive reference is made to the Treaty of Paris (1857).

'Persia and Seistan' also provides a geographic description of the province, along with information on its administrative divisions, climate, and transportation links. Its main purpose however is to outline the development of British attitudes concerning the governance of this province; should it be overseen by Afghanistan or Persia? To provide context, it covers the historical basis for the two competing claims. It concludes by describing the British arbitration of the matter in 1871-72 by General Frederick John Goldsmid, and its outcome; summaries of the statements provided by the Afghan and Persian sides are included.

'Persia and Kohuk' explains how Persia has disputed the award of this province to Khelat by General Goldsmid in 1871, and British reluctance to amend the award in favour of Persia.

'Persia and the Navigation of the Karun River' outlines British efforts to open up the Karun River for steam navigation. It explains that Russian success in improving transportation infrastructure in the north of Persia — in contrast to British failure in the south — is seen to be putting British trade at a disadvantage; the Karun River is seen as having the best potential for resolving this. The prospects for the construction of a railway in southern Persia are also briefly examined.

'Persia and her integrity' details the development of a diplomatic understanding from 1834 between Britain and Russia, in which both powers established their mutual interest in the maintenance of the territorial integrity of Persia. It chiefly concerns British suspicions that Russian activities in central Asia do not match their professed intentions towards Persia (i.e. British fears that Russia is encroaching on central Asia).

'Persia and Merv', in addition to providing an overview of the region's history and ancient settlements, considers what the British consider to be the encroachment of Russia on Persia's northern borders; the British consider any potential Russian occupation of Merv to be a threat, and it is explained that Persian control is preferred.

'Continuation of General Status of Persia' concentrates on British concerns over increases in Russian influence at the Persian Court in Tehran; the British fear Persia becoming a vassal of Russia and facilitating Russian expansion towards Afghanistan. It therefore discusses the extent to which Britain should take advantage of Persian overtures to establish friendly relations with that power in order to prevent this scenario. It also briefly discusses Persian designs on Bahrain, and the desirability — for Britain — in maintaining its status as an independent state, in addition to emphasizing the need to maintain Britain's protectorate role in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. . Topics also included in this section, but covered in less detail include: the conference of consular powers on the Resident in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. ; the development of telegraph lines in Persia; and negotiations respecting the demarcation of the Persian-Turkish border.

The memorandum is signed by Owen Tudor Burne of the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. .

The appendix at the back is divided eight sections as follows:

  • I. 'Employment of British Officers with the Persian Army', f 63;
  • II. A selection of memoranda (dated 20 July-24 December 1868) concerning the need to strengthen British influence over Persia, and the means available to achieve it, ff 63v-64;
  • III. A selection of memoranda (dated 10-30 October 1868) on the possibility of employing British officers with the Persian Army, f 65;
  • IV. 'The Policy of Great Britain towards Persia, ff 66-69;
  • V. Instructions given to Major-General Sir Henry Creswicke Rawlingson as Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary A diplomatic representative who ranks below an ambassador. The term can be shortened to 'envoy'. to the Court of Persia, dated 4 August 1859, ff 68-69;
  • VI. 'Outline Sketch by Colonel Burne of the Shah of Persia's Visit to England, 1873, ff 69-72;
  • VII. 'Note by Colonel Burne on the Persian Army, 20th December 1871', ff 72-73;
  • VIII. 'Abstract of Events in Persia, Afghanistan, &c. from 1722 to the present period', ff 73v-78.
Extent and format
1 file (78 folios)
Arrangement

The file is arranged into eight chapters — outlined in a table of contents on f 1 — with an appendix at the end.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence for this description commences at f 1A and terminates at f 78, as it is part of a larger physical volume; these numbers are written in pencil, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. Pagination: the file also contains an original printed pagination sequence.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

'Persia' [‎23v] (46/156), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/18/C28, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100025538941.0x00002f> [accessed 25 April 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100025538941.0x00002f">'Persia' [&lrm;23v] (46/156)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100025538941.0x00002f">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000833.0x000062/IOR_L_PS_18_C28_0046.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000833.0x000062/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image