'File 12/1 [1 A/1 I] Persian Claims to Bahrain' [‎34r] (72/502)

\y
45
their accession, or o£ any formal acknowledgment by Bahrein
on such occasions of sovereignty or suzerainty such as might
be expected from a Sheikh who regarded himself as a vassal
of Persia Nor does any protest at the absence ot any such
formal acknowledgment appear at any time to have been
made by Persia.
151. The correspondence of 18C9-70, to which particular
attention has been paid by Persia in the past, and which may
be thought the strongest contention that Persia is m a
position to put forward, may indeed be quoted as evidence of
the view taken by Her Majesty’s Government at that period
of the relation of Persia to Bahrein. But it cannot be valid
as against the Sheikhs, and while it is sufficiently loosely
expressed to afford some justification for the construction
which has been placed on it by Persia, it is relevant that
the construction placed on it by Her Majesty s Ambassador
at Constantinople, and supported by the Government ot
India, passed without challenge in 1871 (paragraph 10^ ^
that a similar interpretation was placed on it, with a
minimum of preliminary discussion, m } 880 (paragrap i^ ),
that at frequent intervals between 1870 and 1880 ilis
Majesty’s Government maintained the independence ot
Bahrein against Turkey (paragraphs 99-107 above) ; that so
earlv as January 1870 they drew the attention of the
Turkish Government to the British Note of 18ol (para
graph 61 above); and that His Majesty’s Government have
uninterruptedly maintained the independence of Bahrein
against Persia and Turkey alike since the date of the
correspondence in question.
152 The Sheikhs themselves appear, particularly in the
earlv part of the past century, before their relations with
Her" Majesty’s Government were placed on a more definite
footing by the Agreements of 1880 and 1892, to have been
guided by a consideration of their own immediate interests
in deciding on the line of policy to be adopted towaids the
stronger rulers by whom they were surrounded. But not
only is it now almost three-quarters of a centuiy since an\
appeal, however flimsy, appears to have been made to I ersia
by Bahrein, but the* present Sheikh (like his predecessor)
is" keenly apprehensive of any recognition of the Persian
claim, to which he is most strongly opposed.
C,—Attitude of British Government, 1820-1934.
153. From 1820 onwards His Majesty’s Government
consistently dealt with the Sheikhs as independent mlers.
They concluded treaties with them on that basis in 1820,
1847, 1861, 1868, 1880 and 1892, and they have been
prepared to maintain their independence by diplomatic,
or on occasion bv forcible methods against challenge
from outside, whether from Persia, iurkey, Fgypt oi the
Wahabis. They originally entered into relations with the
Sheikhs and promised them a measure of protection i^paia-
graph 16) in the interests of securing the peace of the
Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. . In the early stages of those relations the}
appear to have been solely concerned to achieve this object (in
1820 they even offered their mediation, which was, however,
not accepted by Persia, to secure the payment of tribute
to Persia by the Sheikhs), and they restricted their inter
ference with the internal affairs of the Sheikhdom to the
minimum required to secure the interests of Butish subjects.
They were consistently reluctant to establish a piotoctoiate
over Bahrein in view of the probable local embarrassments
in regulating the succession, Ac., in which this might
2953 M
>4