Skip to item: of 6
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

'Memorandum. Regarding our future relations with Persia, with special reference to the extension and maintenance of British influence, and to the system of British Consular representation in Southern Persia.' [‎18v] (2/6)

The record is made up of 1 file (3 folios). It was created in 8 Sep 1916. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

as defined roughly in the first paragraph above, we have to consider how
this influence may be rendered effective, and how British interests may best
be represented and protected in our sphere.
G. The first and most obvious point to be borne in mind in the consideration
of this matter is that, as long as Persia remains a single State, whether
really independent or under the joint tutelage of Great Britain and Russia,
the interests of Great Britain must continue to be represented as at present
by a British.Minister at the capital of the country, namely, Tehran. It is
unnecessary to elaborate this point which is an obvious truism of universal
application ; but it is necessary to state it and to bear it in mind.
7. Working under the Minister there must, of course, be Consular officers
in each province. Following the usual custom the Consul or Consul-General
of each province should reside at the capital of the province and have
under him such Vice-Consuls as are necessary to assist him; and each
provincial Consul or Consul-General should, in the natural order of things,
communicate directly with the Minister regarding the affairs of his own
province.
8. This again is an obvious truism which would scarcely need stating
were it not for the fact that the existing system of Consular representation
in Southern Persia presents certain anomalies and inconsistencies, and appears
in some respects to ignore the elementary principles of Consular represen
tation in foreign countries as formulated above. This is a matter regarding
which I have already submitted certain observations, and I would invite a
reference to my despatches on the subject written from Shiraz during the
year 1913, as well as to those of Sir Percy Cox ; and to Sir Edward Grey's
despatch summing up the matter and expressing his own views, and to
Sir Walter Townley’s reply to this last.
9. Briefly put, the anomaly consists in this: that the Resident in the
Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. has gradually acquired a sort of undefined status regarding the
south of Persia which might almost be said to constitute him a kind of
informal Minister for the south, and which gives him the position of Adviser-
in-Chief to the Indian Government regarding great tracts of inland Persia ;
whilst, although residing at a seaport some HOC miles from the capital of
this province, he is styled “Consul-General for Ears.” This situation is
admittedly anomalous, and has been characterised by Sir Edward Grey as
“ illogical.” It has, no doubt, grown up gradually together with the
Resident’s general position and status in the Gulf, and is a relic of an old-
fashioned system which has now completely changed. Formerly, we had no
proper Consular representative at Shiraz (such Consular duties as there
were being performed by a Native Consular Agent) and it was natural that
the Resident at Bushire, who frequently visited Shiraz during the summer
months, should be styled “Consul-General for Ears,” and should maintain a
general interest in, and direction over, Ears affairs ; but with the creation
of a iegular Consulate at Shiraz this position became anomalous, and ivas
necessanly and inevitably a source of friction and misunderstanding. I
would again refei to my despatches on the subject for a full exposition of my
views.
S enera l question of the position of the Resident
m the lersian Gulf it is clear, to begin with, that Bushire itself is a place
of small intrinsic value or importance. It is merely a landing place (for it
can scarcely be termed a “ Port ” in the proper sense of the word) for goods
and travellers starting for inland Ears, and possibly for Ispahan and beyond ;
and even this amount of importance will disappear as soon as Shiraz is
in ve( up y railway Avith Bunder Abbas, when Bushire Avill sink into
comp e e insigni icance as a petty port serving the needs only of the
immediate hinterland districts. The present importance of Bushire is, in
fact, purely artificial and is due to the fact that it is the headquarters of
tde Resident. I he Resident has to live somewhere ; and Bushire, being his

About this item

Content

This memorandum, written by Lieutenant-Colonel William Frederick Travers O'Connor, concerns the new subdivision of Persia into two spheres of influence – Russian and British – with the present neutral zone falling into the British sphere. The memorandum considers what system of Consular or other representation should be adopted in order to maintain not only law and order, but also British influence in the area.

Before discussing the issue of Consular representation, O'Connor mentions two alternative suggestions regarding the future of Southern Persia (the first being that Britain should decline to extend its influence beyond its present zone, and the second being that Southern Persia should be turned into one or more independent states), which he dismisses as lying outside the sphere of practical politics.

Assuming that the British sphere will encompass the whole of Southern Persia, O'Connor advocates the continuation of the existing post of British Minister at Tehran (located in the Russian sphere), and suggests that the Minister should be supported by Consular officers residing in the capital of each province. O'Connor suggests that Consul or Consul-General posts – to be held by officers of the Indian Political Department – should be present in the following places: Sistan [also spelled Seistan in this file] (as at present); Kerman (for the province of Kerman); Shiraz (for Fars, excluding the Gulf hinterland); Mohammerah [Khorramshahr in modern-day Iran] (for Arabistan); and Bushire (for the Gulf and for hinterland affairs).

In addition, O'Connor advocates the appointment of a Resident or Consul in the Bakhtiari country. He suggests that his proposed Consulates be run in the same way as the existing Consulates at Seistan, Meshed and Kerman.

O'Connor goes on to address the problem of the rivalry between the Home Government and the Indian Government on the subject of Southern Persia. He makes the following two proposals: either Southern Persia should be placed under direct control of the Indian Government, or it should be guaranteed that the Minister at Tehran will always be an officer from British India, who has been nominated for the post by the Indian Government.

In this memorandum, O'Connor suggests that the future arrangement of Consular representation in Southern Persia has been made complicated by the anomalous status of the Resident in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. . O'Connor argues that, in the post-war period, whilst it would still be possible to retain a Resident at Bushire, it would not need to be such an important and highly paid appointment; he appears to imply that his proposed Consul at Shiraz and Consul at Bushire would take over the Resident's responsibilities regarding inland Persia and the Gulf and its hinterland respectively.

Extent and format
1 file (3 folios)
Arrangement

The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the front to the rear of the file.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence for this description commences at f 18, and terminates at f 20, as it is part of a larger physical volume; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. A previous foliation sequence, which is also circled, has been superseded and therefore crossed out.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

'Memorandum. Regarding our future relations with Persia, with special reference to the extension and maintenance of British influence, and to the system of British Consular representation in Southern Persia.' [‎18v] (2/6), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/18/C155, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100026566697.0x000003> [accessed 25 April 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100026566697.0x000003">'Memorandum. Regarding our future relations with Persia, with special reference to the extension and maintenance of British influence, and to the system of British Consular representation in Southern Persia.' [&lrm;18v] (2/6)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100026566697.0x000003">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000833.0x000151/IOR_L_PS_18_C155_0002.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000833.0x000151/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image