Skip to item: of 18
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

'Muscat: 1908-1928' [‎40v] (2/18)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 file (9 folios). It was created in 25 Aug 1928. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

0
post, which is at present held bj 7- Major G. P. Murphy, Indian Army, has
* Lor. i, 472 . been maintained without interruption since its revival " after the separation
of Muscat from Zanzibar in 1801. In 1869 it was placed in strict
+ Lor. i, *88-9. subordination to the Political Resident A senior ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul General) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Residency. in the Persian Gidf.'j* Since 18(5/
the Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. has also held His Majesty’s Commission as Consul for
Muscat. Under the Muscat Order in Council A regulation issued by the sovereign of the United Kingdom on the advice of the Privy Council. of 1915 (see paras. 03-4
below), which replaced the Muscat Order in Council A regulation issued by the sovereign of the United Kingdom on the advice of the Privy Council. of 1867, the Political
Agent is the District Magistrate and Sessions Judge, and exercises his
powers subject to the jurisdiction of the Political Resident A senior ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul General) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Residency. in the Persian
Gulf. The limits of the Order are co-extensive with the territories and
territorial waters of the Sultan of Muscat and Oman.
t Lor. i, 499-500,
512-3.
§ Sir D. Bmv to
Mr. Wakoly, D.O.
1956, E.A., Jilly 21
1921. P. 3588/21.
5. A'o specific reference was made to Muscat in the Report of the
Masterton-Smith Committee, and while, under the general principle embodied
in that Committee, matters of political significance on the north Arabian
littoral which may affect relations with Ibn Saud fall to be dealt with by
or in consultation with the Colonial Office, such matters rarely, if at all, arise
in Muscat, and political control may in consequence be regarded as resting,
as in the pre-war period, with the Government of India, subject to the
general control of His Majesty’s Government. Under the principles
embodied in the Masterton-Smith Report, the internal affairs of the State are
in any event the direct concern of the Government of India.
6. With the inconsiderable exception referred to below, expenditure in
Muscat is wholly borne by Indian revenues. That expenditure consists of
subsidies to the Sultan, of Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). presents, and of the cost of maintaining
the Political Agency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, headed by an agent. . The subsidies consist of an annual sum of Rs. 86,400
representing the $40,000 payable by Zanzibar to Muscat under the Canning
award of 1861 (liability for this payment was assumed by His Majesty’s
Government in 18/1, and has since 1st September 1883 been wholly an
Indian charge),J and of the annual subsidy of Rs. 1 lakh One lakh is equal to one hundred thousand rupees paid since 1912
(see paras. 12 and 22 below) in compensation for the losses to the Sultan
arising out of the suppression of the arms traffic, which will cease with the
tenuie of power b> the present Sultan. Ihese charges are fixed, and their
amount cloes ^ ^ary. In the latest year for which authoritative figures are
available (1.)1J- 0) the cost of the Political Agency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, headed by an agent. was Rs. 78,427, and in
the same year Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). presents amounted to Rs. 5,000.§ The solitary item
of expenditure shared with His Majesty’s Government is a yearly payment
in ic&peet of anti-slavery measures, the amount of which in 15126 was Rs. 73
-xcmjo lu uctooer 1913
uiuuui raisai.
6. Ihe dominating feature of the period between 1908 and 1913 i
arms LThi^Statp 1 " T*"*®*? wUh th ® Su,tau of Muscat, of th«
»» rr-:,- isr “ i KH ““
section in paras. 43 to 52 below. ' 1 lth 111 a se P aratt
The Suppression of the Arms Traffic from Muscat.
traffic tLtn^o^cfonZpersiL GulfUUo K T eraI P rC “ 0 “ of the amt
of Muscat had prohibfted in ?8q th ° save Muscat. The Sultan
ammunition to o^from Gwadur h « ‘"T* ° r ex P° rt of a ™ s and
of the Gulf. In 1898 Ili 3 n;,,i e P tnil( ?ncy on the Persian littoral
arms from Muscat to India amf Persia 'whei^t'C' to p , roh f lbit the export oi
and had empowered Persia and Great Itrlft l ‘"'P 01- *, 0 / a ™s was illegal),
enforcing this prohibitirwkhi, Mu,c t r / 0 'T ° n h,S behalf b >' s *a i >
further agreed to the search t iwUsh and 51 dl ' V V tei ' S - f 1 " 1903 be ba «
on the high seas suspected of” carrvintr arms ' ti , !l IP - S ° f Muscat vessels
Muscat, and their export excent to In ?;,' u t the import of arms intc
in 1908. P ’ Xtept to Indla au(l p ersia, were still unprohibited

About this item

Content

Document outlining the administration and history of Muscat from 1908-28. Covering:

It also includes a summary, lists points referred to in connection with the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. Sub-Committee, and states the view expressed by the Government of India.

Written by John Gilbert Laithwaite of the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. .

Extent and format
1 file (9 folios)
Arrangement

This file consists of a single document.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence for this description commences at f 40, and terminates at f 48, as it is part of a larger physical volume; these numbers are written in pencil, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. Pagination: the file also contains an original printed pagination sequence.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

'Muscat: 1908-1928' [‎40v] (2/18), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/18/B400, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100029521110.0x000003> [accessed 29 March 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100029521110.0x000003">'Muscat: 1908-1928' [&lrm;40v] (2/18)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100029521110.0x000003">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000833.0x0003ca/IOR_L_PS_18_B400_0002.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000833.0x0003ca/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image