Skip to item: of 1,138
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

File 2182/1913 Pt 11 'Arabia: relations with BIN SAUD Hedjaz-Nejd Dispute' [‎312v] (179/678)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 item (336 folios). It was created in 16 Oct 1919-28 May 1920. It was written in English and Arabic. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

(
(' 5 «n8)
(156472)
On the 30th November Lord Allenby reported that there was 'a constant rumour
that Hussein would resign and force his sons to accompany him when he left ihe
HeL He suggested that Abdullah should be invited to Cairo m Ins capacity as
Minister for Foreign Affairs to the Hejaz Government. . AXr1 ,
On the 1st December written instructions were given to Colonel Wilson as tofhe
line he should take with King Hussein on his return to Jeddah. He was to mfo..n
fm Lt the whole question of Ins relations with Ibn Sand had been discussed by His
Ma estv’s Government, who were of opinion that he had such a strong case that they
could not understand why he should decline to state it, either m person or before some
impartial arbiter to be appointed by His Majesty's Government. He was to point out
tha^at present there waFno question of demar~
British Commission. He was to suggest aud strongly urge that Mussem stiouia agree
lo meet Ibn Sand personally, which he had previously expressed h,s wd mguess to do
and to say that His Majesty’s Government would readily arrange foi the meet ^ to
take Place at Jeddah, Cairo or Aden. He was to point out that in the event oi Hussein
making difficulties about a personal interview, the alternative of a meeting of
plenipotentiaries would not be likely to produce so satisfactory a result
though His Majestv’s Government would prefer even this alternative to direct
intervention on their part. He was to impress U P 0, \ th "Chidt "even
miUtarv power of the Akhwan were let loose upon the He az, he might even
W Mecfa and thus incur the odium of the Moslem world in general. He was
llso to Tnform Hussein that Ibn Sand had demanded from His Majesty s Gover-
ment a definite recognition of his various claun=, but that he had been to a
His Majesty’s Government must decline even to discuss them until he hail made a
real effort to come to an agreement without their ^“^ 0 ^
to inform Hussein that nothing would give greater pleasure to His _Majesty b G
meat than to receive him in London in the course of the fol owmg year, hut that
before he came to England it was essential that the risk of hostilities between lumsel
and Ibn Sand should be entirely removed, so that troubles should not br^ o^ ikn^
his absence. He was to discuss Ins instructions with His Majesty s High Oommnsio
at Cairo before proceeding to Jeddah. . . c n i i
On the 4th December the Foreign Office enquired whether m view o Colm e
Wilson’s approaching return to Jeddah, Lord Allenby still considered Abdullah s visit
to Cairo t d h e e sl ^ 1 ® ecember Lord A n eri by replied that he considered Abdullah’s visit to
Cairo would be helpful in preparing the ground for a meeting between ussein an
Ibn Sauch^ ^ p) ecem ber the Foreign Office replied approving the suggestion that
Abdullah should be invited to Cairo. tW he
Qn the 13th December Lord Allenby made the alternative suggestion that lie
should himself visit Jeddah and discuss with Hussein personally. Un me
15th December the Foreign Office approved this proposal.
On the 17th December a copy of a telegram of the bth December irom the Civ
Commissioner at Baghdad was received in the Foreign Office, ibis telegrain statod
that Ibn Sand had reported on the 22nd November that Husseins two sons Ah a
Abdullah, with several notables, had left Tail, accompanied by 400 infantry drafts an
200 horses. Ibn Sand believed that, the Sherif intended to move against him, and said
that, if he did so, he would be resisted by foice ; r a- ()p’ ice
On the 17th December the Civil Commissioner was informed by the a
of the proposal that Hussein and Ibn Saud should me ® t e ^.' ts him *
approach Ibn Saud officially until Hussein had expressed his readiness to meet hi ^
lP On the 24th December the Foreign Office received a telegram from Lord Alle y,
in wldch the latter referred to a despatch of the 18th November from the Civ
Commissioner, Baghdad. He considered that his remarks regarding he atuatiOT
Syria and Palestine and the state of Feisal s troops were objectionable.
nfi , n „ Q i ^^'onthe 24th December, the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. enquired whether any con tirmatmn had
(165089) beeu received in the Foreign Office of the report mentioned in the Cavil Coming -
telegram of the 6th December (see above, 162406). 1 hey also transim e( ‘ - t | ie
telegram of the 13th December from the Civil Commissioner m which he ^
receipt of a letter, dated the 26th November, from Ibn Saud. 1q tluh , , |lu3se j n
repudiated the charge that he had been taking taxes at ^aba an I 1 < p- 1 . 8
with a deliberate attempt to create 5 "h, disturLL
it„,„>rnnu>nt bv incorrect statements of this sort. He claimed t
(156998)
(159013)
(16136)
(162406)
<162689)
64924)

About this item

Content

Part 11 concerns British policy regarding the dispute between Bin Saud [‘Abd al-‘Azīz bin ‘Abd al-Raḥmān bin Fayṣal Āl Sa‘ūd, also referred to in the correspondence as Ibn Saud] and King Hussein of Hejaz [Ḥusayn bin ‘Alī al-Hāshimī, King of Hejaz] over Khurma and Tarabah [Turabah]. Much of the correspondence documents the efforts of the British to persuade the two leaders to agree to meet. It is initially proposed that the two should meet at Jeddah; however, it is reported by the Civil Commissioner, Baghdad, that Bin Saud refuses to meet King Hussein at Jeddah, Aden, or Cairo, and suggests a meeting at Baghdad instead. A number of other possibilities are discussed, including the following: the Secretary of State for India's proposal of a meeting of plenipotentiaries, either at Khurma or Tarabah, as an alternative to a meeting between the two leaders themselves; a suggestion by the High Commissioner, Egypt, that the two leaders meet in London; a proposal from Lord Curzon [George Nathaniel Curzon], Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, that Bin Saud should be induced to meet King Hussein on board a British ship at Jeddah, or, as is later suggested, at Aden.

Also included are the following:

  • an account from Captain Norman Napier Evelyn Bray, political officer in charge of the Nejd Mission, which recounts the last days of the mission's stay in Paris, in late December 1919;
  • a report from the High Commissioner, Egypt, on his recent meeting with King Hussein, which relays the latter's views on the allocation of control of Syria to France;
  • discussion regarding the growing power and influence of Bin Saud's Akhwan [Ikhwan] forces;
  • a note on the dispute by Harry St John Bridger, in which he volunteers to induce Bin Saud to agree to a meeting at any place (outside of Hejaz) suggested by His Majesty's Government;
  • memoranda and diary entries written by the Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. at Bahrain, Major Harold Richard Patrick Dickson, all of which discuss at length Dickson's interviews with Bin Saud at Hasa [Al Hasa] in January and February 1920;
  • extracts from a report by the British Agent, Jeddah, Lieutenant-Colonel Charles Edwin Vickery, which recounts his recent interviews with King Hussein and the King's son, Emir Abdullah [ʿAbdullāh bin Ḥusayn al-Hāshimī].

The item features the following principal correspondents:

Extent and format
1 item (336 folios)
Written in
English and Arabic in Latin and Arabic script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

File 2182/1913 Pt 11 'Arabia: relations with BIN SAUD Hedjaz-Nejd Dispute' [‎312v] (179/678), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/391/1, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100032475965.0x000025> [accessed 20 April 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100032475965.0x000025">File 2182/1913 Pt 11 'Arabia: relations with BIN SAUD Hedjaz-Nejd Dispute' [&lrm;312v] (179/678)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100032475965.0x000025">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x00011e/IOR_L_PS_10_391_0636.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x00011e/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image