Skip to item: of 885
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

File 1356/1912 Pt 1 'Turco-Persian Frontier:- negotiations at Constantinople.' [‎55v] (120/885)

The record is made up of 1 volume (436 folios). It was created in 7 Feb 1912-25 Sep 1912. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers.

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

boundary on the S hatt-el-T h'/aiji. A considerable strip of territory would thus be
relinquished to Turkey, especially if we consider Persia’s original claim—the course of
the marsh channel from west of Hawizeh until it reaches the Shatt-et-Arab. Pers^,
can afford to do this 3> for, although the area involved is an extensive one, with irrigabic
potentialities which it is hard to estimate, it is nevertheless probable that the nomad
occupation and cultivation by Shi’eh Arab tribes under Persia would remain unaffected
and that lurkish subjects and Turkish influence would continue to be as non-existent
and unknown east of the natural boundary as they are under existing conditions
8 . As regards (c) I can only say that nothing in Mr. Parker’s memorandum
5 th May ^ ^ a ^ ^ V1GW ex P ressed m m y telegram dated Mohammerah, the
o; l tooiild refer to the following passage, based on the legal opinion of
bn L. Dcividson, Mr. Hurst, and Mr. Malkin, and quoted from the Foreign Ofice
letter^ of the 31st May, 1912 {No. 22934) to the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. ^
Gr ey advised that under normal conditions there is no doubt a
presumption that each riparian owner owns on his side of the river usque ad medium
uia aquae, bin, that, in the present case, that presumption has by implication
urMoubtedhj been swept away by the terms of the Treaty of Erzeroum (1847) the
effect of which was to give Turkey the whole waterway.”
I would also refer to the view of Admiral Slade, A. Hirtzel and Mr Burst
(see joint letter of the 15th May, 1 912, to Sir E. Grey (No. 20863)). A. P.
9. In conclusion, I would urge that having regard to the fact that our commercial
stake and mterests in Southern Persia, present and potential, now mainly centre in
abistan, and are bound up with the maintenance of the Sheikh of Mohammerah’s
position and the strengthening of our special relations with him, we have evei-nhino to
lose by a course of action (the failure to safeguard the status quo which'has been
regaided and treated by the present generation as the established order of thino-s)
which will tend greatly to discredit the value of our engagements and snimort 5 j
create in the minds of the Arab public in the Gulf and the nftive rulers in treaty ’with
us a feeling of apprehension and uncertainty which we can bv no means especially at
this juncture, afford to disregard. - ’ P ' at
Our attitude will, in fact, be regarded as a crucial test of our sincerity and abilitv
to make good our engagements, and I would add the personal opinion that the increased
confidence and frank reliance m us, which the Sheikh of Koweit has shown within the
ast two years, has tieen due less to anything that we have done for him than to the
practical demonstration in the case of Mohammerah of the substantial and moral value
of pm steadfast friendship and support: I should view with very great concern any
action calculated to weaken those sentiments. ^
/ here is a consensus of opinion as the importance of obtaining the most
favourable settlement possible for the sheikh, due regard being had the same
tmie to our general relations with Turkey, to legal and treaty considerations and to
the expediency of not arousing misgivings as to the justice of our attitude in Turkey
u here the Sheikhs of Mohammerahand Koweit, our proteges, have largely invested
in real estate, and might suffer from resentment entertained against
government. Whether our attitude can be such as to insist-if the face Zsible
Turktsh oppos iti on—.uponthe continued exercise of jurisdiction by the
Mohammerah over lus tribesmen resident in admittedly Turkish territory Go- 2
me /.am incident of 1910 was,as I understand it, inspired the
committed against the sheikh's relatives rather than by a determination to resist
sheikh> whh regard to ' i,s
direct ‘ ^ ^ ^
I have, &c.
P. Z. COX, Lieutenant-Colonel, British Resident in
the Persian and His Majesty's Consul-
General for Ears, &c.

About this item

Content

The volume discusses the disputed Turco-Persian Frontier, particularly at Mohammerah, and the negotiations in Constantinople to attempt to settle it.

The correspondence focuses on:

  • the differences of opinion over the actual boundary at Mohammerah, including several maps demonstrating these differences;
  • movements of Turkish and Russian troops;
  • ownership of the Shat-el-Arab and questions of access for navigation;
  • copies of treaties, correspondence and memoranda dating back to 1639 relating to the question of the Turco-Persian frontier.

The principal correspondents in the volume are the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs (Sir Edward Grey); the Secretary of State for India (Robert Offley Ashburton Crewe-Milnes, 1st Marquess of Crewe); the Political Resident A senior ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul General) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Residency. in the Persian Gulf Historically used by the British to refer to the sea area between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. Often referred to as The Gulf or the Arabian Gulf. (Sir Percy Zachariah Cox); the British Ambassador to Constantinople (Sir Gerard Lowther); the British Ambassador to Russia (Sir George Buchanan); the Viceroy of India (Charles Hardinge, 1st Baron Hardinge of Penshurst); the British Ambassador to Tehran (Sir George Head Barclay); representatives of the Foreign Office (particularly Alwyn Parker) and the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. ; and Arthur Talbot Wilson, on special duty in relation to the Turco-Persian Frontier.

This volume is part one of two. Each part includes a divider which gives the subject and part numbers, the year the subject file was opened, the subject heading, and a list of correspondence references contained in that part by year. This is placed at the back of the correspondence.

Extent and format
1 volume (436 folios)
Arrangement

The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the volume.

The subject 1356 (Turco-Persian Frontier) consists of 2 volumes, IOR/L/PS/10/266-267. The volumes are divided into two parts, with each part comprising one volume.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence commences at the first folio with 1 and terminates at the last folio with 436; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.

The foliation sequence does not include the front and back covers, nor does it include the leading and ending flyleaves.

Written in
English and French in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

File 1356/1912 Pt 1 'Turco-Persian Frontier:- negotiations at Constantinople.' [‎55v] (120/885), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/266, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100036171270.0x000079> [accessed 18 November 2019]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100036171270.0x000079">File 1356/1912 Pt 1 'Turco-Persian Frontier:- negotiations at Constantinople.' [&lrm;55v] (120/885)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100036171270.0x000079">
	<img src="https://images.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x00009f/IOR_L_PS_10_266_0124.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x00009f/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image