Skip to item: of 1,010
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

Coll 17/15(2) 'Relations with Persia: Persia-Iraq frontier; Persia's claim in the Shatt-el-Arab' [‎19r] (48/1010)

The record is made up of 1 volume (502 folios). It was created in 21 Feb 1935-15 Jan 1936. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

3
deside]
^PP^j
^ Tliedni.
i at y a %
^ also (ji
tors, lapg j
ions that i.
'ofoundlyli
m and ihei
tte d, he pi
n. He did)
mservancyi
1 structurei;
p
Icy of aWi
to Mazaili
the 18th k
e boundary
sincf to ai
anted a ck
sought ft
1 the prat:
i that %!
the treaties]
s, however:
iginal posit::
the legal h.
The posi
north was:
i Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. sat
a very
;o a redep c
»re forthcoc
) recognise
adequate tf
!t in return
a short ^
optimistic t-
3 dinneu l 1
> Ferougl 111 ’
w» ( °*
; SWt, (
quickk® 1
last sent fI
' have a#
'orthe¥
ersian ^
reverted constantly to the matter in their conversations with members of the Iraqi
delegation. They were disillusioned, but with some difficulty.
15. On the 20th August also it was learned that the Turkish Government
was following the negotiations with the greatest interest. M. Aras had
telegraphed to Yasin Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. and also, it was understood, direct to the Shah,
urging that the opportunity of settlement offered by the presence of the Iraqi
delegation in Tehran should not be lost; once the dispute was settled the three
middle-eastern Governments could proceed to conclude a tripartite treaty of
security and non-aggression; it was suggested that, in view of the European
situation, such a development would be regarded with approval by His Majesty’s
Government.
16. Although some of the permanent officials of the Persian Foreign Office
were understood to be still of opinion that a formula could be found on the lines
discussed in the first interview with Mr. Eeroughi (paragraph 12 above), the
position as between the protagonists was one of complete deadlock (paragraph 13,
last sentence). On the 22nd August, therefore, Nuri Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. wrote a letter to
Mr. Kazemi (Appendix Q) recalling the circumstances in which he had come to
Tehran, summarising the course of the negotiations, and expressing disappoint
ment at the lack of progress, together with a hope that the Persian Government
would still be able to propose an acceptable formula; in conclusion, he asked for
an audience of the Shah to take his leave.
17. On the 23rd August Mr. Kazemi, while promising to answer Nuri
Pasha’s letter as soon as possible, stated that he was most anxious to conclude at
once two treaties, of non-aggression and neighbourly relations, the latter to
provide for the redemarcation of the land boundary; he promised to send drafts
the next day. This proposal appeared to offer some prospect of reducing the
openings for friction, again on the lines discussed in my memorandum No. 9
(Appendix K( 1 )), paragraph 4. His drafts were therefore awaited with interest.
18. On the morning of the 25th August Mr. Kazemi sent the promised reply
(Appendix R) to Nuri Pasha’s letter of the 22nd. It simply denied each and every
statement made.
19. At the same time there arrived, as promised, two draft treaties; but
there was no mention of neighbourly relations or of a redemarcation of the
boundary. The first draft (Appendix S( 1 )) was described as a “ Traite d’Amitie,”
and the second (Appendix T( 1 )) as a “ Traite d’Amitie et de Securite.” The only
articles in the two drafts in any way relevant to the matter which had brought
the Iraqi delegation to Tehran was article 2 of the second treaty, which ran :
“ Les hantes parties contractantes se garantissent I’inviolabilite de leur frontiere
commune.”
20. At 5 o’clock the same afternoon Nuri Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. had an audience of the
Shah. It had always been anticipated that the Abadan anchorage might prove
to be the deus ex machina, to unravel complications at the last moment. These
anticipations were in some measure realised. Nuri Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. , as he deplored his
failure to come to any agreement with the Persian Ministers, contrived to hand to
the Shah a Persian translation of his letter of the 22nd August, to the manifest
discomfiture of Mr. Feroughi and Mr. Kazemi. The Shah, having read the letter,
stated he was ready to accept the existing boundary, land and river, and that he
only wanted the anchorage at Abadan. Mr. Kazemi interposed to interpret the
offer as referring to the thalweg boundary from Mohammerah to Bawarda, as
proposed by the rapporteur in May. Nuri Pasha An Ottoman title used after the names of certain provincial governors, high-ranking officials and military commanders. , however, elicited from the Shah
confirmation that he asked for no more than “ 1 or 2 kilometres ” at Abadan
itself.
21. On the 26th August we returned to Bagdad by air. The text of the
agreed communique is attached as Appendix U^ 1 ) It was agreed that direct
negotiations should be resumed at Geneva.
C. J. EDMONDS.
September 24,1935.
p) Not printed.
[515 dd—1]
I! 2
>
/
//

About this item

Content

This volume is a continuation of Collection 17/5, and contains papers regarding negotiations between Persia [Iran] and Iraq at the League of Nations in 1935, mediated by Italian delegate Baron Pompeo Aloisi. The papers primarily consist of communications regarding the negotiations submitted to the Foreign Office by HM Ambassadors at Rome, Teheran and Baghdad, as well as comments by the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Political Department, the Admiralty, and representatives of the Governments of Persia, Iraq, and Italy.

The negotiations concerned the frontier line along the Shatt el-Arab, the possibility of granting a Persian anchorage at Abadan [Ābādān], the rights of Persian and British warships to traverse and refuel on the river, and the proposed establishment of a Conservancy Board. Following negotiations in Geneva, Rome and Tehran, the Persian and Iraqi Governments had practically agreed on three instruments: a pact of non-aggression, to be signed by Iraq, Persia and Turkey; a treaty for the peaceful settlement of international disputes between Persia and Iraq; and a treaty of friendship, which would settle the frontier question and establish the Conservancy Board.

In addition to the correspondence, the volume contains: documents circulated by the Council of the League of Nations; Reports on the Sessions of the Council submitted to the Foreign Office by C J Edmonds, Second Adviser to the Iraqi Ministry of Foreign Affairs; multiple drafts of the treaty of friendship and non-aggression treaties; and copies of notes exchanged by the Iraqi and Persian Ministers at the League of Nations. A number of these documents are written in French.

The volume includes a divider which gives a list of correspondence references contained in the volume by year. This is placed at the end of the correspondence (folio 1).

Extent and format
1 volume (502 folios)
Arrangement

The papers are arranged in rough chronological order from the rear to the front of the volume.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the first folio with 1 and terminates at the last folio with 498; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. The foliation sequence does not include the front and back covers, nor does it include the leading and ending flyleaves. An additional foliation sequence is present in parallel between ff 1-498; these numbers are also written in pencil, but are not circled.

Written in
English and French in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

Coll 17/15(2) 'Relations with Persia: Persia-Iraq frontier; Persia's claim in the Shatt-el-Arab' [‎19r] (48/1010), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/12/2870, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100045015589.0x000031> [accessed 20 April 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100045015589.0x000031">Coll 17/15(2) 'Relations with Persia: Persia-Iraq frontier; Persia's claim in the Shatt-el-Arab' [&lrm;19r] (48/1010)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100045015589.0x000031">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000602.0x00019c/IOR_L_PS_12_2870_0048.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000602.0x00019c/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image