Skip to item: of 286
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

'File 5/14 Continental shelf and marine area' [‎16r] (31/286)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 file (141 folios). It was created in 7 Jun 1948-17 Sep 1949. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

conception would look on the map. The State Department officials
therefore asked us if you would be good enough to provide us with
a map on which the situation as you see it would be sketched, Much
on the lines of the map which was enclosed in your letter to us
E 9787/716/91 of the 21st November last about the boundaries
between Bahrain and Qatar.
I* ^n the rersian aspect of the problem, their tentative ideas
were rather different to yours. The Iran Section of the State
Department suggested that, in spite of recent excitement over
Bahrain, the question might not really be fundamental importance
to Persia*. They were inclined to believe that more trouble might
be caused by enabling the Persians to say that the states on the
south-western ahore of the Gulf, backed by the United Kingdom and
the United States, had "$wung a fast one on them”, than would be
caused if all the states concerned, Including Persia, were approach
ed at the same time. The Persian Government would certainly make
some fuss, but the Iran Section felt that they might possibley
accept the idea in the end, perhaps with a reservation that their
acceptance must not be taken to prejudice their claims. The other
states, if they accept the scheme need not agree with any Persian
reservations. The State Department officials concerned expressed
the view that the Persian Claim to Bahrain was very weak, but
suggested that it was more likely to be remitted by the Persian
Government to some international authority if the Persians felt
that they had been M bounced”. If this view were accepted, the
question of timing would be of less importance since'Persia would
be informed at the same time as the other states. We pointed out
the difficulties which you foresee - and the additional one that a
Persian refusal, under their proposal, might prejudice the whole
scheme. They emphasised that their views on this point were
personal and were Intended simply for discussion.
8. On the question whether sovereignty over those parts of the
seabed where it was desired to grant concessions should be asserted ^
by the states concerned, the State Department share the views exp
ressed in para 4 of the Foreign Office despatch under reference,
and they think therefore, that this should be done. '
9. On future procedure, the State Department consider that
when the principles and boundaries have been decided between our
two governments, it would be desirable for the United Kingdom
Government to approach the Arab states under their protection, and
for the L.K. Government and the United States Government to approach
the rest jointly, or in concert - i.e. they agree generally with
the views expressed in the first three sentences of para 6 of the
Foreign Office despatch under reference. They added that, from
their point of view, it would be much better to wait until some
solution of thePalestine problem appeared to be in sight, but hoped
tnat this woulli be the ease by the time our two governments are
hre ready to take action.
10. They raised two additional points. The first was that of
secrecy, vjg-g-vtg the oil companies. Some interest in off-share
concessions had been expressed by some United States oil companies
which have, and by some which have not, concessions in the area.
The a&te Department felt that all oil companies shoud have an equal
opportunity of bidding for concessions in hhe areas with which we
are dealing, and hope that you will agree with this. If so, they
suggest that, at the moment when our two governments approach the
states concerned, a press release should be issued about what is
proposed, ee so that everyone would start on an equal footing.
If this were delayed beyond that moment, one or other of the
governments concerned would certainly tell one or other of the oil
companies, and if this were done by the Saudi-Arabian Government
for example, the Arabian American oil Company would start whth an
advantage. The second point on which they would be grateful for
information is whether H.M.G. haver formally adopted, or are likely
to adopt, as a result of these discussions, the principal of the
Continental Shelf for the division of seabed areas in gnneral.

About this item

Content

This file contains papers relating to a plan to extend the sovereignty of the Arab states of the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. into the continental shelf and marine area of the Gulf. The correspondence mentions consultations with the United State's State Department, and the reasons for making joint Anglo-American plans to coordinate the extension of the territorial waters of various Arab Gulf states. Many of the letters discuss this as both a response to Iranian ambitions in the Gulf, and as a cautionary measure so as to avoid conflict between American and British oil interests in the region. Of note are several discussions on the choice of terminology to describe the marine territory in question, such as sovereignty versus jurisdiction.

Extent and format
1 file (141 folios)
Arrangement

The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the front to the rear of the file.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence for this description commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the inside back cover with 143; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. A previous foliation sequence, which is also circled, has been superseded and therefore crossed out.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

'File 5/14 Continental shelf and marine area' [‎16r] (31/286), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/R/15/5/267, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100045090753.0x000020> [accessed 19 April 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100045090753.0x000020">'File 5/14 Continental shelf and marine area' [&lrm;16r] (31/286)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100045090753.0x000020">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000831.0x000116/IOR_R_15_5_267_0031.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000831.0x000116/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image