Skip to item: of 757
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

Coll 20/2 'Administration: Question of abdication of Sultan; Succession and Subsidies; Question of abrogation of treaties with USA and France' [‎153r] (305/757)

The record is made up of 1 file (375 folios). It was created in 7 Oct 1930-26 Aug 1948. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

this question, if the Fore ign Off ice proposals were
accepted any payment to I'uscat would have in future to be
borne by India-
The Government of India were prepared to admit that
there was some advantage in getting rid of dual
responsibility for the Agency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, headed by an agent. , but considered that it was not
such as to compensate them for the additional expenditure
they would incur. They were unwilling to commit themselves
without first deciding whether or not the increase would be
permanent. In their view the Camng award applied not only
to Saiyid Turki himself, but to his successors so long as the
conditions on which the award was made were fulfilled. Since
the Government of India could not regard responsibility for
payment of the subsidy as ceasing on the death of Saiyid
Turki, they would be forced either to bring pressure to bear
on Zanzibar to pay, or to allow the Sultan of ! use at to
enforce his claims, and they therefore found themselves
unable to accept the last tw r o clauses of the settlement
proposed by the Foreign Office. This being so, they
considered that the arrangement was disadvantageous to India.
The Secretary of State had expressed the opinion
that the 1? oreign Office proposals should be accepted. As
those proposals were put forward in Imperial interests, he
agreed that India ought not to be expected to bear any
additional expenditure. On the whole, however, he saw
advantage in acquiescence, in view of the fact that n.k.u.
held strongly to the view that the subsidy was terminable on
the death of Saiyid Turki, and so would probably refuse to
make any contribution towards the subsidy if continued to a
future Sultan of : uscat, in which case, if the arrangement now
proposed were not accepted, India would have to bear the
whole cost of the subsidy plus a moiety of the Agency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, headed by an agent. ex
^'he /

About this item

Content

The file contains letters, telegrams, minutes, and draft correspondence related to the abdication of Sultan Taimur bin Faisal of Muscat [Taymūr bin Fayṣal Āl Bū Sa‘īd] and the accession of his son, Said bin Taimur [Sa‘īd ibn Taymūr Āl Bū Sa‘īd] in 1932. The early correspondence concerns efforts to prevent Taimur from abdicating and to improve Muscat's flagging economy. Once the abdication is accepted several questions are raised and discussed, including:

  • the suitability of a successor and the arrangements for the accession of his son, Said
  • whether to continue both the Arms Traffic and Zanzibar Subsidy payments (this question is raised again in 1948)
  • the renegotiation of Muscat's treaties with the French, Americans, and the tribes of Oman's interior
  • whether to continue Taimur's personal allowance
  • Sultan Said's changes to government

Further correspondence within the file deals with the following matters:

  • requests for statistical information about Muscat from the Danish government for their yearbook in 1934 and 1935
  • a plea from Kamile Ilgiray, an ex-wife of former Sultan Taimur, to the British Government for help with her son's education
  • the question of the best time to inform the French, American, and Dutch governments of Sultan Said's succession
  • the whereabouts of former Sultan Taimur, including his visits to Saudi Arabia in 1933 and Japan in 1939.

The majority of the correspondence is between the Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. in Muscat, Political Residency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, established in the provinces and regions considered part of, or under the influence of, British India. in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. , Government of India (Foreign Department), India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. , and Foreign Office. Further correspondence is from Sultans Taimur and Said, the French and Indian Governments, and several British political and diplomatic offices in Europe and the Middle East.

Extent and format
1 file (375 folios)
Arrangement

The file is arranged in chronological order from the back of the file to the front.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence for this description commences at the inside front cover with 1, and terminates at the last folio with 378; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.

Written in
English and French in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

Coll 20/2 'Administration: Question of abdication of Sultan; Succession and Subsidies; Question of abrogation of treaties with USA and France' [‎153r] (305/757), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/12/2952, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100050222668.0x00006c> [accessed 25 April 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100050222668.0x00006c">Coll 20/2 'Administration: Question of abdication of Sultan; Succession and Subsidies; Question of abrogation of treaties with USA and France' [&lrm;153r] (305/757)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100050222668.0x00006c">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000602.0x0001ef/IOR_L_PS_12_2952_0308.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000602.0x0001ef/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image