![Coll 20/15 'Muscat: Infringement of Muscat territorial waters by Persian vessels' [‎15r] (30/203)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000602.0x000202/IOR_L_PS_12_2971_0030.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg "Coll 20/15 'Muscat: Infringement of Muscat territorial waters by Persian vessels' [‎15r] (30/203)")
Coll 20/15 'Muscat: Infringement of Muscat territorial waters by Persian vessels' [15r] (30/203)
The record is made up of 1 file (98 folios). It was created in 6 Apr 1933-26 Jul 1934. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
COBY.
(E 7113/114/34)
No. 50^*
so H
a
C./ v.'
British Legation, _ ‘
Tehran.
30th October^ 1933.
Sir,
With reference to my telegram No.278 of October
22nd, I have the honour to transmit to you, herewith, a
translation of the note that I have received from the
Minister for Foreign Affairs on the subject of the activities
of a Persian customs launch in Muscat territorial waters
near Khassab on or about June 12th last.
2. You will observe that the reply is a denial in toto
and no attempt is made to raise any of the points of principle
which the alleged action of the customs launch involved (see,
for examole, your despatch No.394 of September 26th,
B 5609/114/34).
3. It is true that there was some uncertainty as to
the identity of the customs launch, but it seems unlikely
that the Wall of Khassab would have fabricated the entire
story.
4. if further evidence regarding the launch's identity
and movements can be secured, I suggest that I should
communicate it to the Persian Government and ask for further
investigations to be made. My note would have to add that
I the question of representations on behalf of Arab rulers had
been, or would be, treated separately.
5. I have ascertained that in the original Persian
text the term "Sheikh” of Muscat, instead of Sultan of Muscat,
is
The Right Honourable
Sir John Simon, G.C.S.I.,
etc., etc., etc..
Foreign Office.
About this item
- Content
Correspondence concerning reports of a Persian warship operating in Muscat territorial waters. The vessel was seen off Khassab, Oman. Much of the correspondence discusses what grounds exist for a British protest to the Persian Government over the incident, with reference to international law and agreements between the British and the Persians (1897) and the British and the Sultan of Muscat (1898) (see folios 95-100), upon which the Persian right to be in Muscat waters was based. Details of other similar incidents to be used against the Persians are included in the papers (folios 3-4 and 18). Further correspondence deals with the need to retain British rights should the Sultan annul any historical proclamations connected to the matter.
The principal correspondents include officials at the Political Residency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, established in the provinces and regions considered part of, or under the influence of, British India. in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. , Government of India (Foreign and Political Department), India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. , Admiralty, Foreign Office, British Embassy in Tehran, and the Persian Ministry for Foreign Affairs. Correspondence between the Council of Regency in Muscat and the Wali of Khassab is also contained within the file.
- Extent and format
- 1 file (98 folios)
- Arrangement
The file is arranged in chronological order from the back to the front.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the inside back cover with 101; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
Coll 20/15 'Muscat: Infringement of Muscat territorial waters by Persian vessels' [15r] (30/203), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/12/2971, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100050228315.0x00001f> [accessed 19 April 2024]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100050228315.0x00001f
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100050228315.0x00001f">Coll 20/15 'Muscat: Infringement of Muscat territorial waters by Persian vessels' [‎15r] (30/203)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100050228315.0x00001f"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000602.0x000202/IOR_L_PS_12_2971_0030.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000602.0x000202/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- IOR/L/PS/12/2971
- Title
- Coll 20/15 'Muscat: Infringement of Muscat territorial waters by Persian vessels'
- Pages
- front, front-i, 1Ar, 2r:16v, 18r:80v, 82r:84v, 86r:95v, back-i, back
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence