Skip to item: of 644
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

Coll 28/67 ‘Persia. Annual Reports, 1932–’ [‎107v] (214/644)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 file (320 folios). It was created in 6 Dec 1933-27 Mar 1947. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

18
with a request that Ilis Majesty’s Minister be instructed as to what reply he
should make. No instructions had been received by the end of the year, except
in regard to one case where the Government of India stated that they were unable
to agree to extradition in the absence of an extradition treaty.
(c) Land Customs and Embarcjos.
153. After some further discussion (see paragraph 291 of the annual report
for 1933) it was decided to impose an embargo on silver on the whole western land
frontier of India. At the same time an embargo was placed on the entry into
India through Las Bala or Kalat of the following goods : piece-goods of cotton,
silk, artificial silk or mixtures, sugar, alcoholic liquors, cigarettes, saccharine.
Ihese goods were, however, still allowed to enter via Nok Kundi and, since some
ol them were produced in Persia, there was thus no infringement of the Tariff
Autonomy Treaty of 1928. It is true that silver has, at any rate up to 1926, been
mined in Persia, but only in the smallest quantities and as it happened the Persian
Government never invoked the Tariff Autonomy Treaty.
154. The Nok Kundi route had been much used by merchants who wished to
avoid the Indian customs duty on silver and who shipped it across Persia in
transit. At the moment the embargo was established, considerable consignments
vvere actually lying at Zahedan or on their way across Persia, and the Persian
Charge d Affaires in London represented that in view of the fact that the embargo
had been established without warning, much hardship was being caused to
exporters and asked that the embargo be raised for six months. After some
discussion he was informed that the Government of India could not agree to the
temporary suspension of the embargo owing to the loss that would result to
Indian revenues. Ihe difficulty was, however, met by an agreement reached Yvith
the I eisian consul-general at Delhi, by which importers of silver were to pay an
amount equal to the sea customs duty when the silver was entrained at Nok Kundi.
155. In October it was disclosed that there was a considerable traffic in
precious stones across this frontier and as diamonds are not a product of Persia,
^ ov A eriimen ^ I n dia considered that an embargo would not infringe the
Tariff Autonomy Treaty. After consultation with London, the embargo was
established in November with the proviso that diamonds confiscated in the first
inrporte? by °se 1? ^ Iedeemed 011 P a y ment of the duty payable had they been
n 15 u 6 i ^ eanw il 1 e a fc ? ta ^ embargo had been placed on the importation over
the whole western 1 arid frontier of Japanese piece-goods, unless covered by a
certificate issued by the Department of Commerce and Industry in Japan This
embargo was part of the general embargo on all Indian land and sea frontiers.
fU f ^ ec T etar y of State : f° r India approved in November the proposal
that a limited and customs regime be established. It was considered best to
appi} this to all land frontiers and not merely to the Persian frontier. The
Governments of Nepal and Afghanistan were warned that this measure was in
contemplation but His Majesty’s Minister stated that, in his opinion the past
behaviour of the I ersian Government absolved the Government of India’from any
obligation to warn them. any
158. At the end of the year an official of the Ministry of Finance approachec
the commercial secretary verbally with a suggestion that the Persian Governmenl
would be willing to prohibit the transit trade through Persia of any articles whicl
the Government of India wished to exclude, provided normal and local trade ir
I ei si an products was left free. This suggestion was communicated to the
the ™ ’ but n ° f0rmal P ro P° sals ha d been received by the close of
(d) Zahedan Railway.
■ A 5 . 9 , Th f Fenian Government did not revert to the question of the reopen
ing of the railway until the very end of the year. The Minister of Finance then
approached His Majesty s Minister privately through the Anglo-Persian Oil
Company with the suggestion that they might meet and discuss the matter He
tradrwith^InX 111 K A° rasan al j d had been impressed with the need of increasing
tiade with India. Moreover, he suggested that the reopening of the railway

About this item

Content

Annual reports for Persia [Iran] produced by staff at the British Legation in Tehran. The reports were sent to the Foreign Office by HM’s Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary A diplomatic representative who ranks below an ambassador. The term can be shortened to 'envoy'. at Tehran (from 1943, Ambassador to Iran). The reports cover the following years: 1932 (ff 2-50); 1933 (ff 51-98); 1934 (ff 99-128); 1935 (ff 129-165); 1936 (ff 166-195); 1937 (ff 196-227); 1938 (ff 228-249); 1939 (ff 250-251); 1940 (ff 252-257); 1941 (ff 258-266); 1942 (ff 267-277); 1943 (ff 278-289); 1944 (ff 290-306); 1945 (ff 307-317); 1946 (ff 318-320).

The reports for 1932 to 1938 are comprehensive in nature (each containing their own table of contents), and cover: an introductory statement on affairs in Persia, with a focus on the Shah’s programme of modernisation across the country; an overview of foreign relations between Persia and other nations, including with the United Kingdom, British India, and Iraq; Persia’s involvement in international conventions and agreements, for example the League of Nations and the Slave Traffic Convention; British interests in or associated with Persia, including Bahrain and Bahrainis resident in Persia, the Residency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, established in the provinces and regions considered part of, or under the influence of, British India. at Bushire, the Anglo-Persian Oil Company, Imperial Bank of Persia, and the Imperial and International Communications Company; political affairs in Persia, including court and officials, majlis, tribes and security; economic affairs in Persia (government finances and budgets, trade, industry, agriculture, opium production); communications (aviation, railways, roads); consular matters; military matters (army, navy, air force).

Reports from 1939 to 1946 are briefer in nature, Reports from 1941 onwards focusing on the Anglo-Soviet occupation of Persia, and the role of United States advisors in the Persian Government’s administration.

The file includes a divider, which gives a list of correspondence references contained in the file by year. This is placed at the back of the correspondence.

Extent and format
1 file (320 folios)
Arrangement

The file’s reports are arranged in chronological order from the front to the rear of the file. Each report for the years 1932-1938 begins with a table of contents referring to that report’s own printed pagination sequence.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the inside back cover with 321; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.

The file contains one foliation anomaly, f 308A

Pagination: Each of the reports included in the file has its own printed pagination system, commencing at 1 on the first page of the report.

Written in
English and French in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

Coll 28/67 ‘Persia. Annual Reports, 1932–’ [‎107v] (214/644), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/12/3472A, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100056661167.0x00000f> [accessed 19 April 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100056661167.0x00000f">Coll 28/67 ‘Persia. Annual Reports, 1932–’ [&lrm;107v] (214/644)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100056661167.0x00000f">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000648.0x00001b/IOR_L_PS_12_3472A_0214.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000648.0x00001b/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image