Skip to item: of 644
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

Coll 28/67 ‘Persia. Annual Reports, 1932–’ [‎261v] (522/644)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 file (320 folios). It was created in 6 Dec 1933-27 Mar 1947. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

r. -
8
«
troops and for their very presence on Persian soil; but also for the incompetence,
mismanagement and continued corruption of the Persian administration. The
widespread shortage of wheat, sugar and other essential commodities was easily
attributed to the selfish British, and no credit was for a moment given for the
supplies which were despatched to Persia in considerable quantities and in ships
badly needed for other purposes. For the growth of this feeling a skilful
pro-German propaganda, and in particular the daily broadcasts in Persian from^*
Berlin, was partly to blame, but it has become almost automatic in Persia to
attribute to Great Britain the responsibility for any unpleasant event that may
occur. Even the Persian Government, who were in possession of all the facts,
though pressed continually by His Majesty’s Minister to give them publicity in
the press and on the wireless, supinely preferred to occupy themselves with other
matters, regardless of the fact that their own prestige was receiving a corres
ponding set-back. The abdication of Reza Shah gave a momentary fillip to our
reputation, but the inconveniences and privations resulting from the war in
general and from the occupation in particular, soon reduced us to the position of
permanent villain in Persian eyes.
21. It was in these unfavourable circumstances that negotiations for a
treaty of alliance between Persia, Great Britain and Soviet Russia were
launched on their long and tortuous course. The proposal had originated with
His Majesty’s Government even before the overthrow of Reza Shah, and had the
personal approval of the Prime Minister, Mr. Firoughi, and Sir R. Bullard was
instructed on the 14th September to inform Mr. Firoughi and his Minister for
Foreign Affairs, Mr. Soheily, of the desire of the Allied Powers to conclude such a
treaty, negotiations for which might be initiated as soon as the question of the
Axis Legations and communities was satisfactorily solved. Mr. Firoughi
promised to work to that end immediately on the conclusion of the constitutional
crisis which had arisen out of the abdication of the Shah. On the 1st October
a copy of the draft text, which had been drawn up in London, was communicated
unofficially to the Minister for Foreign Affairs. At the same time, in order to
create a more favourable atmosphere, the question of withdrawing British and
Soviet troops from Tehran was under consideration. On the 6th October,
however, Mr. Soheily addressed identical and somewhat peremptory notes to
Sir R. Bullard and M. Smirnov, requesting the evacuation of Tehran and its
neighbourhood in order to ally public anxiety, restore security and permit the
Persian Government to carry on with the administration of the country. These
notes were obviously directed against the Soviet Government and had an
unfortunate effect on M. Smirnov, which did not predispose him to treaty negotia
tions, though he had hitherto appeared to share the opinion of His Majesty’s
Minister, that the proximity of the Allied troops to the capital tended to
demomlise the Persian Government and to create the risk that the Allies might
be dragged into the administration first of Tehran and then of the whole country.
The Soviet Government, however, accepted the British draft treaty, which was
communicated to the Persian Government officially on the 17th October. On the
same day British and Russian troops withdrew from the neighbourhood of
Tehran. , ^ .
22. The examination of the draft by the Persian Government was now
adversely affected by the Russian withdrawal in the Ukraine, which, to the minds
of the majority of the Persians, seemed likely to result in th$ early occupation
of the Caucasus by the German forces. When the German community was ejected
from Persia, they departed with loud assurances that they would return in three
months. This fear of the return of infuriated Germans bent on revenge for their
summary dismissal was artfully fomented from abroad by the Berlin broadcasts
in Persian, and from within by agents, of whom the great majority were them
selves Persians, certain of the invincibility of German arms, seduced by German
gold, and looking for reward, or at least hoping for immunity if the country
should be occupied by the Germans. Moreover, it seemed certain that to reconcile
the Persian public to an alliance with the traditional enemy—'Russia—would
prove an almost superhuman task in view of the reports (usually exaggerated) of
the behaviour of the Russian troops. The Prime Minister himself was old. tired
and preoccupied with grave problems of internal security, food shortage and a
financial deficit. Universally respected though he was, he had neither the
physical strength nor the forceful personality necessary to reconcile the divisions
in a pusillanimous Cabinet. The negotiations initiated in this uneasy atmos-

About this item

Content

Annual reports for Persia [Iran] produced by staff at the British Legation in Tehran. The reports were sent to the Foreign Office by HM’s Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary A diplomatic representative who ranks below an ambassador. The term can be shortened to 'envoy'. at Tehran (from 1943, Ambassador to Iran). The reports cover the following years: 1932 (ff 2-50); 1933 (ff 51-98); 1934 (ff 99-128); 1935 (ff 129-165); 1936 (ff 166-195); 1937 (ff 196-227); 1938 (ff 228-249); 1939 (ff 250-251); 1940 (ff 252-257); 1941 (ff 258-266); 1942 (ff 267-277); 1943 (ff 278-289); 1944 (ff 290-306); 1945 (ff 307-317); 1946 (ff 318-320).

The reports for 1932 to 1938 are comprehensive in nature (each containing their own table of contents), and cover: an introductory statement on affairs in Persia, with a focus on the Shah’s programme of modernisation across the country; an overview of foreign relations between Persia and other nations, including with the United Kingdom, British India, and Iraq; Persia’s involvement in international conventions and agreements, for example the League of Nations and the Slave Traffic Convention; British interests in or associated with Persia, including Bahrain and Bahrainis resident in Persia, the Residency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, established in the provinces and regions considered part of, or under the influence of, British India. at Bushire, the Anglo-Persian Oil Company, Imperial Bank of Persia, and the Imperial and International Communications Company; political affairs in Persia, including court and officials, majlis, tribes and security; economic affairs in Persia (government finances and budgets, trade, industry, agriculture, opium production); communications (aviation, railways, roads); consular matters; military matters (army, navy, air force).

Reports from 1939 to 1946 are briefer in nature, Reports from 1941 onwards focusing on the Anglo-Soviet occupation of Persia, and the role of United States advisors in the Persian Government’s administration.

The file includes a divider, which gives a list of correspondence references contained in the file by year. This is placed at the back of the correspondence.

Extent and format
1 file (320 folios)
Arrangement

The file’s reports are arranged in chronological order from the front to the rear of the file. Each report for the years 1932-1938 begins with a table of contents referring to that report’s own printed pagination sequence.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the inside back cover with 321; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.

The file contains one foliation anomaly, f 308A

Pagination: Each of the reports included in the file has its own printed pagination system, commencing at 1 on the first page of the report.

Written in
English and French in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

Coll 28/67 ‘Persia. Annual Reports, 1932–’ [‎261v] (522/644), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/12/3472A, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100056661168.0x00007b> [accessed 25 April 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100056661168.0x00007b">Coll 28/67 ‘Persia. Annual Reports, 1932–’ [&lrm;261v] (522/644)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100056661168.0x00007b">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000648.0x00001b/IOR_L_PS_12_3472A_0522.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000648.0x00001b/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image