Skip to item: of 644
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

Coll 28/67 ‘Persia. Annual Reports, 1932–’ [‎265v] (530/644)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 file (320 folios). It was created in 6 Dec 1933-27 Mar 1947. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

myp.'.if ,. jjitj
4^
16
colleague, was replaced by an able and agreeable young man, M. Smirnov, who
had spent several years in Berlin, first as assistant press attach^, and later as
counsellor to the Soviet Embassy. In Meshed the Soviet military authorities
showed the deepest suspicion of His Majesty’s Consul-General, to such an extent
that an appeal for co-operation had to be made to the Soviet Government by^g^
Mr. Eden, though before the instructions from Moscow, which were eventually «
sent, could reach Meshed, the attitude of the Soviet military authorities there
had altered completely on the arrival from India of the first consignment of jute
and shellac for Russia by the Zahidan route. General Novikov, who was in
command of the Soviet troops in the west, though blandly evasive whenever his
British comrades-in-arms asked for information, was personally full of friendli
ness and hospitality. The Soviet troops, both officers and men, seem to have been
astounded at the easy and friendly relations existing between the officers and
men in the British and Indian forces; it was obvious that the opinions instilled
into them by official Soviet propaganda was badly shaken. The Soviet
authorities, however, found much in our official actions to feed their suspicions.
It was unfortunate that the fact that the Russians are suspicious had apparently
not been communicated to the British military and air authorities. Represen
tatives of the air command would arrive, sometimes unannounced, with the
statement that they were going to reconnoitre the aerodromes in the Soviet zone;
a party of British journalists and photographers from Bagdad went to
Azerbaijan without seeking the permission of the Soviet authorities; and,
finally, three British officers with four lorries filled with Indian troops arrived at
Tabriz from Bagdad, unannounced, to reconnoitre the roads in the Russian zone
up to the Soviet frontier, and had to be ignominously withdrawn in the face of
Russian objection. The argument of the British authorities responsible for these
incidents seems to be that, since the object in every case was the promotion of the
common cause, the Soviet authorities had no need to worry or object. The answer
to this is that the Soviet authorities considered themselves capable of
reconnoitring their own roads and aerodromes, and probably, not having been
allowed by their Government to forget the “ intention ” of Great Britain and
other Powers after the last war, regarded our curiosity on the subject as likely
to be directed against the Soviet Union as much as against Germany. At one
moment the Government of India became slightly alarmed at the advance of
Russian troops to the south of Meshed and secured the acceptance by His
Majesty’s Government of a proposal to send at least a token force to Zabul
or possibly Birjand should it prove necessary, the Russians, however, withdrew
so the project was not carried into effect.
44. About a month after the occupation the economic state of Persia seemed
to be so unfavourably affected by local Soviet policy that His Majesty’s Minister
suggested that a permanent commission should be set up in Tehran with British
and Persian members to deal with all non-military questions arising out of the
occupation. The Soviet Ambassador declared himself to be in favour of this
scheme personally, but was obviously unwilling to take action. What was wanted,
in Sir R. Bullard’s opinion, was a Soviet commissar with wide powers to undo
the knots tied by Soviet stupidity and fear of responsibility. This proposal was
supported bv His Majesty’s Government, but the Soviet Government preferred
to leave such matters to the British and Soviet representatives in Tehran to deal
with. It is possible that the Soviet Government feared to find themselves in a
permanent minority in such a tripartite committee, and, indeed, great discretion
would have been required on the part of the British representative. In point of
fact, His Majesty’s Minister avoided all Persian attempts to drag His Majesty’s
Government into Soviet-Persian disputes, though at times His Majesty’s Secretary
of State had to bring arguments to bear upon M. Maisky in order to effect an
improvement in the behaviour of the Russians in Persia. The British in Persia
were doing their best to assist the Soviet effort by pushing through the largest
possible quantity of goods. The United Kingdom Commercial Corporation, whose
original business had been to buy up goods of which the enemy had urgent need,
now set up a huge road-transport organisation for the carriage of goods to
Russia. Skilled railway officials from India and elsewhere were despatched to
Persia soon after the occupation : by the end of the year they had already effected
great changes for the better in railway administration, and large numbers of
workshops and operational personnel were on the way, and locomotives and
wagons were beginning to arrive. An enormous scheme of road repair and

About this item

Content

Annual reports for Persia [Iran] produced by staff at the British Legation in Tehran. The reports were sent to the Foreign Office by HM’s Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary A diplomatic representative who ranks below an ambassador. The term can be shortened to 'envoy'. at Tehran (from 1943, Ambassador to Iran). The reports cover the following years: 1932 (ff 2-50); 1933 (ff 51-98); 1934 (ff 99-128); 1935 (ff 129-165); 1936 (ff 166-195); 1937 (ff 196-227); 1938 (ff 228-249); 1939 (ff 250-251); 1940 (ff 252-257); 1941 (ff 258-266); 1942 (ff 267-277); 1943 (ff 278-289); 1944 (ff 290-306); 1945 (ff 307-317); 1946 (ff 318-320).

The reports for 1932 to 1938 are comprehensive in nature (each containing their own table of contents), and cover: an introductory statement on affairs in Persia, with a focus on the Shah’s programme of modernisation across the country; an overview of foreign relations between Persia and other nations, including with the United Kingdom, British India, and Iraq; Persia’s involvement in international conventions and agreements, for example the League of Nations and the Slave Traffic Convention; British interests in or associated with Persia, including Bahrain and Bahrainis resident in Persia, the Residency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, established in the provinces and regions considered part of, or under the influence of, British India. at Bushire, the Anglo-Persian Oil Company, Imperial Bank of Persia, and the Imperial and International Communications Company; political affairs in Persia, including court and officials, majlis, tribes and security; economic affairs in Persia (government finances and budgets, trade, industry, agriculture, opium production); communications (aviation, railways, roads); consular matters; military matters (army, navy, air force).

Reports from 1939 to 1946 are briefer in nature, Reports from 1941 onwards focusing on the Anglo-Soviet occupation of Persia, and the role of United States advisors in the Persian Government’s administration.

The file includes a divider, which gives a list of correspondence references contained in the file by year. This is placed at the back of the correspondence.

Extent and format
1 file (320 folios)
Arrangement

The file’s reports are arranged in chronological order from the front to the rear of the file. Each report for the years 1932-1938 begins with a table of contents referring to that report’s own printed pagination sequence.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the inside back cover with 321; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.

The file contains one foliation anomaly, f 308A

Pagination: Each of the reports included in the file has its own printed pagination system, commencing at 1 on the first page of the report.

Written in
English and French in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

Coll 28/67 ‘Persia. Annual Reports, 1932–’ [‎265v] (530/644), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/12/3472A, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100056661168.0x000083> [accessed 25 April 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100056661168.0x000083">Coll 28/67 ‘Persia. Annual Reports, 1932–’ [&lrm;265v] (530/644)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100056661168.0x000083">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000648.0x00001b/IOR_L_PS_12_3472A_0530.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000648.0x00001b/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image