Skip to item: of 644
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

Coll 28/67 ‘Persia. Annual Reports, 1932–’ [‎307v] (614/644)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 file (320 folios). It was created in 6 Dec 1933-27 Mar 1947. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

2
Democrats strengthened by Caucasian toughs from the Socialist Soviet Republic
of Azerbaijan. The Russian regular forces in the province repeatedly interfered
with the movements of the local Persian forces directed to the suppression of this
uprising and more than once disarmed detachments which were trying to restore
order. On the 19th November the Persian Government despatched a small force
of troops and gendarmes from Tehran to reinforce the garrisons in Azerbaijan,
but this column was stopped by the Red army before reaching Qazvin.
5. From this point onwards the situation steadily deteriorated, and the
whole of Azerbaijan passed rapidly into the hands of the insurgents. By the
middle of December an Azerbaijan National Parliament had assembled at Tabriz
and proceeded to appoint an autonomous Government. It chose as Prime
Minister the Democrat party leader, Dr. Pishavari, who had been elected through
Russian pressure as a member of the Fourteenth Majlis but had not succeeded in
getting his credentials accepted; and approved his nomination of a Cabinet of
nine Ministers, including Ministers for Defence, Interior, Education, Health,
Finance and Justice, but not Foreign Affairs.
6. The Persian Government, having been prevented by the Russians from
using their forces to deal with the insurgents, sought to resolve the problem by
means of diplomatic action. They addressed a note to the Soviet Embassy asking
that permission should be given for the column which had been held up to proceed,
and at the same time they appealed for support to the Governments of the U nited
States and Great Britain. The former responded by proposing that all foreign
troops should be withdrawn by the 1st January, and the latter by expressing to
the Soviet Government the hope that they would be able to instruct their military
commanders to cease to obstruct the movement of Persian forces.
7. To the Persians the Soviet Government replied that they had no
objection in principle to the despatch of forces to Azerbaijan but doubted the
practical wisdom of such action since it might lead to conflict, in which event
the Russian forces in the area would have to be increased. They therefore
considered it inexpedient that any more Persian forces should be despatched to
the northern provinces. The fictitious quality of this pretext is made evident
by the fact that the Russians had about 30,000 troops in Azerbaijan at the time,
i.e., about five times as many as the Persians had in the same area, while the
reinforcements which the Persians proposed to send to Tabriz numbered only
about 1,000 rifles.
8. To the British note the Soviet Government replied that the despatch of
more troops to Azerbaijan was undesirable as it would lead to avoidable bloodshed.
To the United States they responded by a categorical refusal to withdraw their
troops before the date stipulated in the Anglo-Soviet-Persian Treaty of 1942.
(This is discussed in more detail in the section dealing with the withdrawal of
Allied troops.)
9. Soon after the failure of this friendly intervention by the United States
and Great Britain news was received that Mr. Bevin and Mr. Byrnes were to
have talks with M. Molotov at the end of December, and the Persian Government
suspended further diplomatic action to deal with the Azerbaijan question in the
hope that a solution would be found at Moscow.
10. Concurrently with their encouragement and protection of the
Azerbaijan <£ Democrats,” the Soviet authorities in Persia gave a similar
stimulus to the Kurdish nationalists. This is discussed below in the section on
Tribal Affairs. It can be safely assumed, on the available information, that the
Soviet plan is to exploit Kurdish nationalism for Russian ends in much the same
way that they have utilised the racial sentiments and aspirations of the Turki
element in the northern provinces.
11. At the Moscow Conference the British and American delegations
submitted on the 24th December a draft agreement for the establishment, with
the consent of the Persian Government, of an Anglo-American-Soviet Commission
to assist the Persian Government in re-establishing satisfactory relationships
with its provinces through the erection of provincial councils as provided by the
Constitution of 1907. This commission would also make recommendations to the
Persian Government concerning the use of minority languages and would
supervise the first elections to the provincial councils. The commission would
also investigate, and make recommendations on, the withdrawal of Allied troops.
The object of the proposal was to seek Soviet co-operation in limiting Azerbaijan
autonomy and bringing that province back under the authority of the Central
Government The same evening Generalissimo Stalin informed Mr. Bevin that
agreement might be reached on this basis subject to minor amendments. These
were presented on the 25th December and accepted by Mr. Bevin on the
ri
%

About this item

Content

Annual reports for Persia [Iran] produced by staff at the British Legation in Tehran. The reports were sent to the Foreign Office by HM’s Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary A diplomatic representative who ranks below an ambassador. The term can be shortened to 'envoy'. at Tehran (from 1943, Ambassador to Iran). The reports cover the following years: 1932 (ff 2-50); 1933 (ff 51-98); 1934 (ff 99-128); 1935 (ff 129-165); 1936 (ff 166-195); 1937 (ff 196-227); 1938 (ff 228-249); 1939 (ff 250-251); 1940 (ff 252-257); 1941 (ff 258-266); 1942 (ff 267-277); 1943 (ff 278-289); 1944 (ff 290-306); 1945 (ff 307-317); 1946 (ff 318-320).

The reports for 1932 to 1938 are comprehensive in nature (each containing their own table of contents), and cover: an introductory statement on affairs in Persia, with a focus on the Shah’s programme of modernisation across the country; an overview of foreign relations between Persia and other nations, including with the United Kingdom, British India, and Iraq; Persia’s involvement in international conventions and agreements, for example the League of Nations and the Slave Traffic Convention; British interests in or associated with Persia, including Bahrain and Bahrainis resident in Persia, the Residency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, established in the provinces and regions considered part of, or under the influence of, British India. at Bushire, the Anglo-Persian Oil Company, Imperial Bank of Persia, and the Imperial and International Communications Company; political affairs in Persia, including court and officials, majlis, tribes and security; economic affairs in Persia (government finances and budgets, trade, industry, agriculture, opium production); communications (aviation, railways, roads); consular matters; military matters (army, navy, air force).

Reports from 1939 to 1946 are briefer in nature, Reports from 1941 onwards focusing on the Anglo-Soviet occupation of Persia, and the role of United States advisors in the Persian Government’s administration.

The file includes a divider, which gives a list of correspondence references contained in the file by year. This is placed at the back of the correspondence.

Extent and format
1 file (320 folios)
Arrangement

The file’s reports are arranged in chronological order from the front to the rear of the file. Each report for the years 1932-1938 begins with a table of contents referring to that report’s own printed pagination sequence.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the inside back cover with 321; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.

The file contains one foliation anomaly, f 308A

Pagination: Each of the reports included in the file has its own printed pagination system, commencing at 1 on the first page of the report.

Written in
English and French in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

Coll 28/67 ‘Persia. Annual Reports, 1932–’ [‎307v] (614/644), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/12/3472A, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100056661170.0x00000f> [accessed 25 April 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100056661170.0x00000f">Coll 28/67 ‘Persia. Annual Reports, 1932–’ [&lrm;307v] (614/644)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100056661170.0x00000f">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000648.0x00001b/IOR_L_PS_12_3472A_0614.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000648.0x00001b/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image