Skip to item: of 1,190
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

Coll 7/14 'Persia and Persian Gulf: suggested Anglo-Persian Arms Traffic Agreement. Persia and the Arms Traffic Convention' [‎280r] (570/1190)

The record is made up of 1 volume (591 folios). It was created in 18 Aug 1926-28 Jun 1933. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

INDIA DIRECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF HIS BRITANNIC MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT
PERSIA.
CONFIDENTIAL.
[E 6433/2529/34]
ecembar 7. 1932.
. 4 2 . ( j^CTHON 7.
19
6 3
No. 1.
Mr. Hoare to Sir John Simon .— (Received December 7.)
(No. 478.)
gj r Tehran, November 17, 1932.
IN my telegram No. 182 of the 11th November last, I mentioned that the
Minister of Court had communicated to me a draft arms traffic convention at
the interview which I had with him on the 10th November, and I expressed the
opinion that the fact that his Highness should have gone to the trouble to prepare
a draft was proof of the importance which he and the Persian Government
attached to this subject. . , . . ,
2. I now have the honour to transmit a copy of the text oi this draft,
exactly as I received it from Teymourtache, and to offer certain observations
thereon. n 1 , . .
3. The preamble calls for little comment, although it needs correction in
matters of form and language. The words “ la pratique du ’ are redundant, but
appear to be unobjectionable in themselves. The adjective illicite ” seems also
to be unobjectionable, although the adjective “ irregulier," which I adopted in
my draft enclosed in my private letter of the 25th September to Mr. Rendel, is the
one used in the international convention of 1925.
4. Article 1 of Teymourtache’s draft corresponds exactly with article 1 (1)
of my draft. , . . ,
5. Article 2 of Tevmourtache’s draft also corresponds in general with
article 3 (1) of my draft! It naturally omits the words k ‘ en principe, ’ which
are dependent upon the remaining sections of the same article. It also provides
that, while Persian warships shall onlv supervise vessels flying the Persian hag.
British warships shall supervise all other vessels whatsoever. Presumably this
generosity is intentional; if so, it indicates a most satisfactoij f i a me o min .
It would be for His Majesty’s Government to decide whether, from the point ot
view of our relations with other Powers, it is possible to accept the °ff 61 > in . ac ua ,
practice, the position resulting from it would be very similar to that envisage
by the international convention of 1925. t . . L1 r>
6. Article 3 corresponds to my article 2. and is unobjectionable excep
the definition of territorial waters as being 7 kilom. in extent, which 1 presume
can in no circumstances be accepted. ..
7. Article 4. to which I have little doubt Teymourtache attaches grea
importance, is also, I fancy, entirely unacceptable, and as e ^ ,
convention is not in force it is really pointless as well. 1SC P
variants below. . , i fmm
8. Article 5, except for the concluding paragraph, appears to ^
objection. The exact periods of duration and notice aie ^ , P . ^
importance, and can, no doubt, be arranged to the satis ac ion P
1 9. If His Majesty’s Government are prepared to negotiate an arms traflic
convention at all, I would suggest that I should, in the fi!s c WO uld
my draft, or some variation of it, to Teymourtache, and as ' i mi - n t j ie
not sufficiently meet his object. If he proved obdurate i won , P, ^ g} aver y
one direction, to whittle the draft down until it resem e _ Persian
Convention, and. in the other, to insert some formula by which th^ Persian
Government placed on record their inability to aecep e
tion, and even their disapproval of its terms. , ,, b Teymourtache’s
10. The greatest obstacle to success would probabi} ^ that the
wish for the acceptance bv His Majesty s Go\ernmen ^ {( • j zones ” 0 f
Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. and the Gulf of Oman are not included m the special^
the convention. On this point I would try to coa ^ 1 S p er6 ian Government
Persia itself was not in one of the special knd zo s, "inclusion in the
were barking up the wrong tree in taking e^xcep ^if 0 f Oman,
special maritime zones of the high seas of the Pei si.
[663 g— 7]

About this item

Content

The volume consists of extensive correspondence, plus minutes and memoranda, relating to the 1925 Convention for the Supervision of the International Trade in Arms and Ammunition and in Implements of War (Arms Traffic Convention), and the subsequent attempts to reproduce certain of its provisions in an international covenant at the Geneva Disarmament Conference of 1932-1933.

The principal correspondents are: the Government of India Foreign and Political Department; the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Political Department; the Admiralty; the Foreign Office; HM Minister at Tehran (R H Hoare); the Political Resident A senior ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul General) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Residency. in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. ; and the UK Delegate to the Disarmament Conference (E H Carr). The volume also contains a number of communications received from members of the Persian Government (Muhammad Ali Foroughi [Furūghī], Abdolhossein Teymourtache, and Anoushirvan Khan Sepahbodi).

The material principally concerns negotiations between the Persian [Iranian] and British Governments. The Persian Government wished to have the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. and the Gulf of Oman excluded from the list of special maritime zones, and sought British support in achieving this at the Conference. In response to British concerns about the possible impact on their ability to effectively limit the transport of arms and slaves in the region, the Persian Government proposed a bilateral Anglo-Persian treaty.

The following topics are discussed in depth:

The following are particular items of interest:

  • memorandum of the Persian Delegation to the League of Nations, noting their objections to the Arms Traffic Convention, ff 517-522;
  • communication from HM Legation to Tehran, enclosing details of an interview with the Persian Minister for Foreign Affairs and Minister for the Court (Foroughi and Teymourtache), ff 492-500;
  • minutes of the Interdepartmental Cabinet Committee on the International Disarmament Conference, ff 394-420;
  • details of a meeting between the Foreign Office and the Persian Minister to Switzerland (Sepahbodi), ff 185-192;
  • Persian Government aide-mémoire on the progress of the negotiations, ff 121-124.

The volume includes a divider which gives a list of correspondence references contained in the volume by year. This is placed at the end of the correspondence (folio 1).

Extent and format
1 volume (591 folios)
Arrangement

The papers are arranged in rough chronological order from the rear to the front of the volume

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence commences at the first folio with 1 and terminates at the last folio with 587; these numbers are written in pencil, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. The foliation sequence does not include the front and back covers, nor does it include the two leading and ending flyleaves. A previous foliation sequence has been superseded and therefore crossed out.

Written in
English and French in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

Coll 7/14 'Persia and Persian Gulf: suggested Anglo-Persian Arms Traffic Agreement. Persia and the Arms Traffic Convention' [‎280r] (570/1190), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/12/2182, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100062983815.0x0000ab> [accessed 18 April 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100062983815.0x0000ab">Coll 7/14 'Persia and Persian Gulf: suggested Anglo-Persian Arms Traffic Agreement. Persia and the Arms Traffic Convention' [&lrm;280r] (570/1190)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100062983815.0x0000ab">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000555.0x0002d1/IOR_L_PS_12_2182_0570.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000555.0x0002d1/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image