Skip to item: of 544
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

File 2764/1904 Pt 3 'Baghdad Railway: general negotiations 1910-1912.' [‎104v] (217/544)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 volume (268 folios). It was created in 1910-1912. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

1
the two branch lines to which I had drawn his attention, and that in any case I thought
the Imperial Government had done more than sufficient to gratify Germany’s amour-
propre by withdrawing their opposition to the whole Bagdad Railway scheme.
M. Sazonow, I said, had always told me that whatever might be the interpretation given
to the term “Bagdad Railway,” Russia would continue to co-operate with us just as"’
much after as before the signature of the agreement, and I should like to know whether
his Excellency thought that it would still be possible for Russia to support us should
difficulties arise with regard to the construction of the Gulf section. M. Neratof
replied that Russia was under no obligation to facilitate the construction of the railway
and that though she could not now have recourse to methods of direct obstruction, she
could still co-operate with us in many ways and give us her indirect support. Though
his Exceilency’s language was not very clear on this point, I gather that Russia would
still be able to support any scheme which we might put forward with regard to the
construction of the Gulf section, even though it did not meet with Germanv’^
approval. J
The agreement, taken as a whole, must undoubtedly be regarded as a diplomatic
success for Germany, and a retrospect of the various phases of the negotiations which
have extended over the past nine months, does not tend to enhance the reputation of
those who have conducted them on Russia’s behalf. The initial mistake was committed
m i . onow . a } low ed himself to be entrapped, during his conversations with
M. .derlen, mto verba l assurances of which he did not at the time realise the
, ull significance.. This was due to his want of experience as a negotiator and to his
^ not weighing his words, rather than to the deliberate intention of throwing over the
1 ‘!° TTT h the ,h riple Enten - e < Tlms ’ without an y P revious consultation
flitli them he had pledged Russia to withdraw her opposition to the Bagdad Railway
scheme, and though he subsequently endeavoured to restrict this engagement to the
Romeh-Bagdad line, it was clear from the outset that Germany would hold him to the
strict letter of his bond. His disregard of the understanding on which t£ three
Governments had hitherto acted that no individual member oi the Triple Entente
was to conclude an arrangement with Germany till the other two had obtained
satisfaction for their respective claims, the vacillation and deplorable weakness which
he displayed m the discussion over the Khanikin-Tehran line, and the uneasiness
neither Ruslia V no, U Ge SSnranCeS had changed at Potsdam to the effect that
dfrecffi • * G ® rma p; w °uld join any combination that could in any way be
directed against the other, all combined to produce the impression that a serious blow
had been struck at the stability of the Triple Entente. Fortunately these fears nrovel
firm aTvoTJe ofb, ° r ’ ^ “TT * 1 ba ? k - sMi ^ M. SazTnow wa^t Crt a
tbl ^ 5^ -p f + i th mamtenance of that understanding. M. Neratof who took un
ph a 11 ieacs ^ the negotiations wlien M. Sazonow was incapacitated' by illness is
footsfeps^and tT make P f ohli ^ ed to follow ^ Sazono’w’s
tsteps and to make further graceful concessions to Germany He assures rue
nZTed w ' tTb 18 nothing kept back that does ^ot appear in the'
resueer d t i ° f the a & reement ’ beyond the verbal assurances given P by Germanv
respecting railway construction to the north of Khanikin, and that since the Germ™
entering. 11 * ^hhTtrt^
conversation with France is un rWto a a i n en S a to e d m a very delicate
while M Kiderlen mav cnuo-minl + i • ^ errQa ny as a valuable asset;
sr4=.. &£ t
what may be the outcome of tbe 6 81 - 1 ’ ’ as , l 8 . lm possible to foresee at present
no doubt well pleased to havp m l^p 18 ! rou ^ b wb ich that country is passing, she is
her a free hl^ a » —ngement under which Germany leaves
I have, &c.
GEORGE W. BUCHANAN.

About this item

Content

The volume comprises telegrams, despatches, correspondence, memoranda, newspaper cuttings, maps and notes, relating to negotiations over the proposed Berlin to Baghdad Railway in the period 1910-1912.

The discussion in the volume relates to the economic, commercial, political and military considerations impinging on British strategy for the international negotiations over the development of a railway to Baghdad.

Further discussion surrounds the motivations and strategies of British competitors in the area; included in the volume is a copy of the Russo-German agreement.

The principal correspondents in the volume include Sir Edward Grey, Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs and Sir Gerard Augustus Lowther, Ambassador to Constantinople.

Extent and format
1 volume (268 folios)
Arrangement

The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the volume.

The subject 2764 (Bagdad Railway) consists of five volumes, IOR/L/PS/10/56-60. The volumes are divided into five parts with each part comprising one volume.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the main foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the first folio with 1 and terminates at the inside back cover with 269; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. A previous foliation sequence, which is also circled, has been superseded and therefore crossed out. Pagination: a pagination sequence in red crayon is present between ff 244-252.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

File 2764/1904 Pt 3 'Baghdad Railway: general negotiations 1910-1912.' [‎104v] (217/544), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/58, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100064831519.0x000012> [accessed 28 March 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100064831519.0x000012">File 2764/1904 Pt 3 'Baghdad Railway: general negotiations 1910-1912.' [&lrm;104v] (217/544)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100064831519.0x000012">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000365.0x00038f/IOR_L_PS_10_58_0217.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000365.0x00038f/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image