Skip to item: of 868
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

File 200/1928 Pt 10 'Persia: Anglo-Persian Relations. Treaty Negotiations' [‎30r] (60/868)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 volume (432 folios). It was created in 24 Jan 1934-5 Aug 1936. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

of the two neighbours, and that anything conducing to friendly relations between
Iran and Iraq would seem to be an important factor in British policy.
Conversely, absence of a settlement between the two parties will probably recoil
on our relations with Iran, as we shall be held responsible for failure to induce
Bagdad to come to terms.
f 16. Russia is perhaps not a dangerous rival at present, and even if she were,
a policy of direct antagonism to her, however carefully concealed, would defeat
its own object. I he best insurance against dangerous competition from Russia
or any other quarter, and also the best guarantee for the protection of British
interests, is the establishment of sound relations between ourselves and this
country. It may be remarked that Russia need not be the only possible
competitor. I here have been indications of Italian ambitions, German com
mercial and cultural propaganda is active, and only a few days ago the Prime
Minister spoke to me somewhat seriously of the ultimate probability of a forward
policy by Japan which would affect this country.
17. I have left one important point to the end, being fully conscious of the
difficulties which it presents. The Prime Minister has twice since my arrival
spoken to me of the Arms Traffic question, once on the occasion of my first visit
to His Highness last January and again on the 19th June. On both occasions His
Highness laid great emphasis on the importance in Iranian eyes of being
accorded equal treatment in this as in all other matters. In general I am fully
aware that it is the intention of His Majesty’s Government to treat the Iranian
Government on terms of absolute equality, and this has only recently been
confirmed in Sir John Simon’s telegram No. 79 of the 23rd March last. The
difficulty in this case is that there exists a doubt in our minds as to the manner
in which the Iranian navy would carry out their duties in the case of vessels
under a foreign, or if full reciprocity were accorded, under the British flag. In
the light of certain experiences with Arab dhows in the past, this is entirely
comprehensible. There is also, perhaps, a feeling that it is unsuitable that
vessels flying British or foreign flags should be subjected to the possibility of
search by a unit of the Persian navy. The first objection is practical, the second
to some extent also, sentimental. The first could perhaps be overcome. I see no
objection to its being brought tactfully, if perhaps unofficially, to the notice of
the Iranian Ministry for Foreign Affairs at the proper time. The second,
however much sympathy it deserves, contains the germ of that very inequalitv
of thought which always has and always will poison our relations until all
suspicion of it is removed from the Iranian mind. It cannot be said to be in
accordance with the general attitude or policy of His Majesty’s Government
outlined earlier in this despatch. In the circumstances, I reluctantly feel that
this problem, which must in time be solved if durable friendly relations are to
be established, may have to be left to be dealt with later. If the present improve
ment in the atmosphere can be continued and other problems be disposed of, it
may be possible to approach it more hopefully on both sides. If the Iranian
Government ultimately recognise our position vis-a-vis the Arab rulers, the
argument on which we last based our refusal of their proposals will fall to the
ground. Time, moreover, may conduce to the development of a better standard
of behaviour on the part of the Iranian navy. One may almost hope that this
desirable development has begun—certainly there have been no serious incidents
recently and, probably owing to instructions sent by the Shah after his audience
of the Naval Commander-in-chief and myself on the 10th January, relations
between the Iranian and British naval forces in the Gulf have greatly improved.
It seems not unreasonable to hope that, if His Majesty were brought to under
stand our difficulty, he would issue orders enjoining proper treatment of vessels
stopped for visitation and search. In such circumstances, it may be possible in
time to extend the principle of co-operation, the germ of which we have seen in
the Iranian proposal regarding the lights and buoys. I understand that the
extent of the arms traffic in the Gulf is now small and, in present conditions, I
should have thought that the possibility of search by an Iranian warship would,
in itself, act as a very effective deterrent. In any case, I feel that it is essential
to the establishment of sound relations that this question should in time be
settled So long as our present attitude is maintained, it is impossible to argue
lhat we are anxious to treat Iran on equal terms as a civilised people, and until
we C an convince the Iranian Government of our determination to do this it is
hopeless to look for durable good lelations.

About this item

Content

This volume contains correspondence regarding wide-ranging negotiations that took place between the Persian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the British Legation in Tehran, the aim of which was the agreement of a bilateral treaty between the British and Persian [Iranian] governments in order to resolve a number of outstanding issues including the status of Basidu.

In addition to correspondence, the volume contains the following documents:

  • 'Speech by His Imperial Majesty the Shah at the Majlis on the Day of its Reopening for the Tenth term, Khordad 5, 1314 June 6,1935); (folio 34)
  • 'Memorandum by Mr. Eden upon a Conversation at Geneva on May 22, 1935, with M. Kazemi, the Persian Minister for Foreign Affairs, respecting Anglo-Persian relations' (folio 45)
  • 'Anglo-Persian Relations. Mr. Knatchbull-Hugessen's conversation with Persian Minister.' (folios 119-122)
  • 'Committee of Imperial Defence. Standing Official Sub-Committee for Questions Concerning the Middle East. Minutes of a meeting of the Sub-Committee held at No. 2, Whitehall Gardens, S.W.1. on Thursday, 25th October, 1934, at 3.30 p.m.' (folios 130-137)
  • 'Committee of Imperial Defence. Standing Official Sub-Committee for Questions Concerning the Middle East. Minutes of the Thirty-fifth meeting of the Sub-Committee, held at No. 2, Whitehall Gardens, S.W.1., on Friday, October 12th, 1934, at 3,30 p.m.' (folios 151-168)
  • 'Committee of Imperial Defence. Standing Ministerial Sub-Committee for Questions Concerning the Middle East. Bahrein. Memorandum by Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.' (folio 169)
  • 'Committee of Imperial Defence. Standing Official Sub-Committee for Questions Concerning the Middle East. Minutes of a meeting of the Sub-Committee held in the Room of the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, House of Commons, S.W.1, on Monday, June 11th, 1934, at 4.0 p.m.' (folios 261-276)
  • 'Relations with Persia. Admiralty Memorandum', 1934 (folios 284-289)
  • 'Committee of Imperial Defence. Standing Ministerial Sub-Committee for Questions Concerning the Middle East. Persian Policy. Memorandum by the Secretary of State for India', 1934 (folios 290-291)
  • 'Persia. Memorandum by Sir R. Vansittart' Foreign Office, 1934 (folios 316-317)
  • 'Committee of Imperial Defence. Standing Official Sub-Committee for Questions Concerning the Middle East. Minutes of a meeting of the Sub-Committee held in Conference Room 'A', No. 2, Whitehall Gardens, SW1, on Friday, May 4th, 1934, at 3.45 p.m.' (folios 355-378)
  • 'Proposed Anglo-Persian General Treaty. Position reached on January 17, 1934' (folios 417-431).

The volume includes a divider which gives the subject number, the year the subject file was opened, the subject heading, and a list of correspondence references by year. This is placed at the back of the correspondence.

Extent and format
1 volume (432 folios)
Arrangement

The subject 200 (Anglo-Persian Treaty Negotiations) consists of eight volumes, IOR/L/PS/10/1250-1257. The volumes are divided into ten parts, with parts 1 and 2 comprising one volume, parts 3, 4 and 5 comprising one volume each, parts 6 and 7 comprising the fifth volume, and parts 8, 9 and 10 comprising one volume each.

The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the volume.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the inside front cover with 1, and terminates at the last folio with 433; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

File 200/1928 Pt 10 'Persia: Anglo-Persian Relations. Treaty Negotiations' [‎30r] (60/868), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/1257, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100066374630.0x00003f> [accessed 18 April 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100066374630.0x00003f">File 200/1928 Pt 10 'Persia: Anglo-Persian Relations. Treaty Negotiations' [&lrm;30r] (60/868)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100066374630.0x00003f">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000466.0x000293/IOR_L_PS_10_1257_0062.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000466.0x000293/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image