Skip to item: of 868
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

File 200/1928 Pt 10 'Persia: Anglo-Persian Relations. Treaty Negotiations' [‎149r] (298/868)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 volume (432 folios). It was created in 24 Jan 1934-5 Aug 1936. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

■■■
%
7
Henjam by His Majesty’s ships, and that they would certainly sooner or later
press for our evacuation. The difference between a formal lease and a
Gentleman s Agreement ” was unlikely to appeal to them.
I he CHAIRMAN suggested that it was for the Admiralty and the
1 reasury to decide the amount of the insurance premium that it would be
^|desirable to pay to guard against this risk. The Foreign Office could only point
out that the risk was there.
CAP I AIN KING said that he doubted whether the preparation of Bahrein
would assist the new Minister at Tehran in any negotiations with the Persian
authorities. He thought it probable that any development of Bahrein would be
the critical factor in deciding the Persian Government to ask for the evacuation
of Henjam. He reminded the meeting that the Persian claim to Bahrein had
recently been vigorously reasserted, and thought there would be a serious risk
that the Shah would regard any Naval activities there as an unfriendly and even
provocative act.
He was not in a position to give details of the estimate of £40,000 which had
been stated to be necessary in order to make Bahrein fit for use by sloops of the
Royal Navy. The setting up of navigational lights and beacons would be
essential, but it was possible that the causeway, whicn was estimated to cost some
£9,000, could be dispensed with for the present.
Mr. SEAL pointed out that, if the development of Bahrein was regarded
as an insurance premium, the Admiralty would be paying an insurance premium
of 100 per cent. In fact, he regarded any proposal to develop Bahrein before a
decision had been taken to evacuate Henjam as open to very serious financial
objection, since if we remained at Henjam, as might well be the case if history
repeated itself, the money would have been wasted.
CAPTAIN KING agreed that the Admiralty would not like to start on an
alternative scheme unless they were sure that there was no hope of retaining the
use of Henjam. He pointed out that the Foreign Office case turned on the alleged
fact that it would take fifteen months to improvise an alternative to Henjam.
Although it was true that the building of the projected base at Bahrein would
take at least fifteen months, nevertheless he felt confident that the Navy would
be able to improvise temporary accommodation very rapidly if they had to leave
Henjam.
Mr. LAITHWAITE suggested that it might be a help if the Admiralty
prepared an estimate of the proposed expenditure on Bahrein, giving the cost
of each item and the desired priority of work. It would then be possible to find
out what was the minimum insurance necessary for the Navy to carry on at
Bahrein should we be ordered to quit Henjam.
THE CHAIRMAN thought that, although it was not possible for the
Sub-Committee to put forward any new recommendations to Ministers, the
discussion had been justified, as it had enabled the Sub-Committee to become
acquainted at first hand with the views of Colonel Fowle and of Mr. Knatchbull-
Hugessen, had enabled both these officers to hear the views of the interested
departments of His Majesty’s Government, and had rendered possible a restate
ment and reassessment of the position. He summarised the new factors which
had arisen since the meeting of the Ministerial Sub-Committee on the 11th June
last as follows :—
I. The report of the Law Officers on the Persian claim to Bahrein.
This was categorically against the Persian claim and greatly strengthened
the position of His Majesty’s Government in taking any measures they thought
necessary at Bahrein and taking a firm line vis-a-vis the Persian claim.
II. —Political developments.
(1) The new exchange of Ministers with Persia, i.e.. the arrival of a new
Persian Minister in London with apparently a special mandate to try to improve
relations and Mr. Knatchbull-Hugessen’s impending departure for Tehran. The
Persians had intimated that they expected favourable developments as a result
of this new exchange of Ministers and if no favourable results occurred the
situation might be expected rapidly to deteriorate.

About this item

Content

This volume contains correspondence regarding wide-ranging negotiations that took place between the Persian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the British Legation in Tehran, the aim of which was the agreement of a bilateral treaty between the British and Persian [Iranian] governments in order to resolve a number of outstanding issues including the status of Basidu.

In addition to correspondence, the volume contains the following documents:

  • 'Speech by His Imperial Majesty the Shah at the Majlis on the Day of its Reopening for the Tenth term, Khordad 5, 1314 June 6,1935); (folio 34)
  • 'Memorandum by Mr. Eden upon a Conversation at Geneva on May 22, 1935, with M. Kazemi, the Persian Minister for Foreign Affairs, respecting Anglo-Persian relations' (folio 45)
  • 'Anglo-Persian Relations. Mr. Knatchbull-Hugessen's conversation with Persian Minister.' (folios 119-122)
  • 'Committee of Imperial Defence. Standing Official Sub-Committee for Questions Concerning the Middle East. Minutes of a meeting of the Sub-Committee held at No. 2, Whitehall Gardens, S.W.1. on Thursday, 25th October, 1934, at 3.30 p.m.' (folios 130-137)
  • 'Committee of Imperial Defence. Standing Official Sub-Committee for Questions Concerning the Middle East. Minutes of the Thirty-fifth meeting of the Sub-Committee, held at No. 2, Whitehall Gardens, S.W.1., on Friday, October 12th, 1934, at 3,30 p.m.' (folios 151-168)
  • 'Committee of Imperial Defence. Standing Ministerial Sub-Committee for Questions Concerning the Middle East. Bahrein. Memorandum by Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.' (folio 169)
  • 'Committee of Imperial Defence. Standing Official Sub-Committee for Questions Concerning the Middle East. Minutes of a meeting of the Sub-Committee held in the Room of the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, House of Commons, S.W.1, on Monday, June 11th, 1934, at 4.0 p.m.' (folios 261-276)
  • 'Relations with Persia. Admiralty Memorandum', 1934 (folios 284-289)
  • 'Committee of Imperial Defence. Standing Ministerial Sub-Committee for Questions Concerning the Middle East. Persian Policy. Memorandum by the Secretary of State for India', 1934 (folios 290-291)
  • 'Persia. Memorandum by Sir R. Vansittart' Foreign Office, 1934 (folios 316-317)
  • 'Committee of Imperial Defence. Standing Official Sub-Committee for Questions Concerning the Middle East. Minutes of a meeting of the Sub-Committee held in Conference Room 'A', No. 2, Whitehall Gardens, SW1, on Friday, May 4th, 1934, at 3.45 p.m.' (folios 355-378)
  • 'Proposed Anglo-Persian General Treaty. Position reached on January 17, 1934' (folios 417-431).

The volume includes a divider which gives the subject number, the year the subject file was opened, the subject heading, and a list of correspondence references by year. This is placed at the back of the correspondence.

Extent and format
1 volume (432 folios)
Arrangement

The subject 200 (Anglo-Persian Treaty Negotiations) consists of eight volumes, IOR/L/PS/10/1250-1257. The volumes are divided into ten parts, with parts 1 and 2 comprising one volume, parts 3, 4 and 5 comprising one volume each, parts 6 and 7 comprising the fifth volume, and parts 8, 9 and 10 comprising one volume each.

The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the volume.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the inside front cover with 1, and terminates at the last folio with 433; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

File 200/1928 Pt 10 'Persia: Anglo-Persian Relations. Treaty Negotiations' [‎149r] (298/868), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/1257, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100066374631.0x000065> [accessed 25 April 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100066374631.0x000065">File 200/1928 Pt 10 'Persia: Anglo-Persian Relations. Treaty Negotiations' [&lrm;149r] (298/868)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100066374631.0x000065">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000466.0x000293/IOR_L_PS_10_1257_0302.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000466.0x000293/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image