Skip to item: of 961
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

Coll 17/15(1) 'Perso-Iraq Relations: Persia-Iraq frontier; Persia's claim in the Shatt-el-Arab' [‎200r] (410/961)

The record is made up of 1 volume (476 folios). It was created in 1 May 1933-15 Mar 1935. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

Annex IX.
OTTOMAN CONSTITUTION OF DECEMBEE 22nd, 1909.
Article 7.
Amended in 1909.
(Penultimate paragraph.)
“ The sanction of Parliament is required for the conclusion of treaties relating to
peace, commerce, or the cession or annexation of territory.”
Annex X.
Extract from the Minutes of the Delimitation Commission of 1914.
8 evenly-sixth Meeting.
The Ottoman Commissioner stated that he had received instructions from his
Government to discontinue the delimitation.
The other Commissioners, not having received any similar communication, said
that they would refer to their respective Governments in order to report the facts and
request instructions. In the meantime, it was decided to complete the maps as far as
Mir Omar Dagh.
Seventy-seventh Meeting.
The Ottoman Commissioner said that he had received fresh instructions from his
Government to inform the Commission that various considerations compelled the Ottoman
Government to defer toa later date the delimitation of the section of the frontier situated
between Mir Omar Dagh and Mount Hidir Baba. He said that the status quo would remain in
force for that section, and the demarcation would be continued northwards. The
Commissioner also pointed out that, as Article XIII of the Protocol entitled the Commission
to postpone the delimitation of a part of the frontier, no derogation from the provisions
of that instrument was involved.
The Persian Commissioner said he had already referred this matter to his Government,
and he was of opinion that the frontier of that district should be marked on the map, the
evacuation of the places which would fall to Persia being postponed to a later date.
The Ottoman Commissioner declined this proposal.
After discussion, the Commission noted the Ottoman declaration, but asked the
Ottoman Commissioner whether he would submit to a majority vote, in accordance with
Article XIII of the Commission’s Eules of Procedure, drawn up and signed by the
representatives of the four States.
The Ottoman Commissioner said that he could not submit to a majority vote.
The Eussian Commissioner then pointed out that, in order not to lose time, and in
view of climatic conditions, the demarcation should be continued. But, at the same
he said, it should be noted that the Ottoman Commissioner’s refusal was contrary to the
Eules of Procedure, and the fact should be notified to the respective Governments.
After further discussion, the Commissioners accepted the view of the Eussian
Commissioner, and decided to resume the delimitation as from Hidir Baba.
Seventy-eighth Meeting.
fact
The Persian Commissioner reported that he had notified his Ottoman col eague o
t that he had been informed that Ottoman soldiers had again encampei a i er
Sartyk. The Ottoman Commissioner said he had immediately telegrap e
Constantinople, and had just received a reply to the effect that, if sue i an oc ^ u
had taken place, orders' would be given for the withdrawal of those soidiers
Commissioner thanked his Ottoman colleague for this reply, which, he said, < e
the goodwill of the Ottoman Government.

About this item

Content

The volume contains papers regarding relations between Persia [Iran] and Iraq. It primarily concerns the frontier delineated by the 1913-1914 Boundary Commission, in particular Persian claims over areas of the Shatt el-Arab, and rights to oilfields in the Naft Khana [Naft Khāna] or Khaniqin [Khāniqīn]area. The papers document renewed negotiations over the border, and include discussion of the following topics: Iraqi concerns over Persian military activities conducted in Iraq; Persia's refusal to recognise the validity of the 1914 Frontier Delimitation Protocol; attempts to redraw the frontier at the Shatt el-Arab along the thalweg [valley way], as opposed to the medium filum aquae ; proposals to revive the Shatt el-Arab Conservancy Board Scheme; and proposals for an agreement to regulate the exploitation of the oilfields in the transferred territories on the frontier near Khanqin, including the proposed creation of a special zone. These papers primarily consist of correspondence between the following: HM Ambassadors at Baghdad, Teheran and Italy; the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Political Department; the Foreign Office (principally Sir John Simon, and J C Sterndale-Bennet); the Iraqi Minister for Foreign Affairs; and the Persian Minister for Foreign Affairs.

In 1935 the Iraqi Government formally raised the question of the frontier with the Council of the League of Nations, and sought a Court ruling as to the validity of the 1914 Boundary Protocol. The Italian delegate to the League (Baron Pompeo Aloisi) was designated Rapporteur to the negotiations, and the volume contains correspondence between the Foreign Office and HM Ambassador in Rome, regarding a proposed Italo-Iraqi Treaty of Friendship, proposals regarding the frontier made by Aloisi, and general Italian influence over Iran and Iraq. The volume also includes copies of memoranda and minutes circulated by the League, in addition to correspondence regarding the negotiations in Geneva and Italy, and documents from the Committee of Imperial Defence Standing Official Sub-Committee for Questions Concerning the Middle East.

The volume includes a divider giving a list of correspondence references found in the volume by year. This is placed at the end of the correspondence (folio 1).

Extent and format
1 volume (476 folios)
Arrangement

The papers are arranged in rough chronological order from the rear to the front of the volume.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence for this description commences at the first folio with 1, and terminates at the last folio with 472; these numbers are written in pencil and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. The front and back covers, along with the two leading and two ending flyleaves, have not been foliated.

Written in
English and French in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

Coll 17/15(1) 'Perso-Iraq Relations: Persia-Iraq frontier; Persia's claim in the Shatt-el-Arab' [‎200r] (410/961), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/12/2869, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100074341459.0x00000b> [accessed 20 April 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100074341459.0x00000b">Coll 17/15(1) 'Perso-Iraq Relations: Persia-Iraq frontier; Persia's claim in the Shatt-el-Arab' [&lrm;200r] (410/961)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100074341459.0x00000b">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000602.0x00019b/IOR_L_PS_12_2869_0410.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000602.0x00019b/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image