Skip to item: of 961
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

Coll 17/15(1) 'Perso-Iraq Relations: Persia-Iraq frontier; Persia's claim in the Shatt-el-Arab' [‎235r] (480/961)

The record is made up of 1 volume (476 folios). It was created in 1 May 1933-15 Mar 1935. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

fem
iiktW
e#.;.
is described as following the low-water level of the left bank of the Shatt-el-Arab,
leaving it only to the extent necessary to leave in Persia the named islands
referred to above and the anchorage of Mohammerah.
The Directorate of the Port of Basra derives its authority from the Inland
Waters Shipping Proclamation, 1919, and the Port of Basra Proclamation, 1919,
issued by the General Officer Commanding-in-chief, the British Forces in Iraq.
Under article 114 of the Constitutional Law of Iraq these proclamations have
the validity of Iraqi law.
On the 9th November, 1932, two sloops and four gunboats recently acquired
for the Persian navy entered the Shatt-el-Arab and proceeded up-stream to
Mohammerah. . .
Previously to this date the Iraqi Government had at various times had
occasion to complain to the Persian Government of violations of the Iraqi
sovereignty in the Shatt-el-Arab by its agents in the Departments of Customs
and Police, who were reported to be patrolling the river, interfering with country
craft, &c. ' Complaints were generally met with denials or allegations that the
incidents complained of had occurred in “Persian waters” or the “Persian
waters of the Shatt-el-Arab.”
From the date of the arrival of the Persian war vessels, however, it became
clear that the Persian officers were acting under orders to disregard the rules
and by-laws of the Port of Basra and to flout the authority of the Directorate
by entering the dredged Rooka Channel, which is open to one-way traffic only,
without ascertaining from the control officer that the channel was clear, by
ignoring the signals of the pilot-master and other competent authorities, bv
anchoring in the prohibited area, showing great reluctance to move when requeste
to do so, by steaming at excessive speeds, and by similar breaches of the ru es.
Apart from the Segal irregularity of these proceedings, the rash seamanship
of the Persian officers is highly objectionable for other reasons; it has caused
at least one serious grounding; on several occasions collisions have been narrowly
averted; the dredged channel is constantly in jeopardy; a collision involving an
outward-bound tanker carrying dangerous oils might have th f “fhUwhole sef
quences- any blocking of the river would bring to a standstill the whole sea
borne trade of Iraq (the Shatt-el-Arab constituting Iraq s soie ehannel of access
to the sea), not to mention the oil trade of Persia itself. It has been f
necessary to institute, at considerable expense, wire ess wa c ,, p ers i an
and wireless stations in order that timely warning o pp
ships may be passed on and a wide berth be giYen to em. Persian
In the course of an informal interview on the 9th March UTd o W X
senior naval officer stated to the Port Director tha e, sl ‘\ , p a g., a Port
sovereignty of Iraq over the whole of the Sha -e - rules.
Administration, and that he could, therefore, no 00 PJ. limits
Pilotage is compulsory for every sea-going vessel exempt from
of the Port of Basra. Although certain Government vessels are exempt
pilotage, it is clearly laid down m E he ™ custom of Ihe harbour-master to berth
in harbour limits; it has been, and is, the custo f ra Abbadan
men-of-war of all nationalities inside the harbour l™^Uor a few months untU,
Reach. These facilities were used by the Persian s ^r of thUpUt of Basra!
on the 23rd June, 1933, Ca P ta ^ ^gfhaTwded the Persian ship Palang,
In reply to the protests against this outi age on o T j ri f roin the Persian
the following reply was received by the Iraqi Minister at leniai
Minister for Foreign Affairs :— , „
“Persian Minister for F° rei S\
Suwaidi, Iraqi Minister in Tehran, No. 13164, dated any ,
(Translation ^
“ M. le Ministre PlfniP ot ®”l iai re> din „ t h e arrest of McLeod by
“ In reply to your lettel „^; 12 p er fia : I lave the honour to inform
the Persian naval forces in Southeii
your Excellency that— . _ r™
“(1) The harbour of Abbadan ^Ulraqf Government is, therefore,
appointment of a harbour-master by the Iraqi vxo ^ ^
[290 c—1]

About this item

Content

The volume contains papers regarding relations between Persia [Iran] and Iraq. It primarily concerns the frontier delineated by the 1913-1914 Boundary Commission, in particular Persian claims over areas of the Shatt el-Arab, and rights to oilfields in the Naft Khana [Naft Khāna] or Khaniqin [Khāniqīn]area. The papers document renewed negotiations over the border, and include discussion of the following topics: Iraqi concerns over Persian military activities conducted in Iraq; Persia's refusal to recognise the validity of the 1914 Frontier Delimitation Protocol; attempts to redraw the frontier at the Shatt el-Arab along the thalweg [valley way], as opposed to the medium filum aquae ; proposals to revive the Shatt el-Arab Conservancy Board Scheme; and proposals for an agreement to regulate the exploitation of the oilfields in the transferred territories on the frontier near Khanqin, including the proposed creation of a special zone. These papers primarily consist of correspondence between the following: HM Ambassadors at Baghdad, Teheran and Italy; the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Political Department; the Foreign Office (principally Sir John Simon, and J C Sterndale-Bennet); the Iraqi Minister for Foreign Affairs; and the Persian Minister for Foreign Affairs.

In 1935 the Iraqi Government formally raised the question of the frontier with the Council of the League of Nations, and sought a Court ruling as to the validity of the 1914 Boundary Protocol. The Italian delegate to the League (Baron Pompeo Aloisi) was designated Rapporteur to the negotiations, and the volume contains correspondence between the Foreign Office and HM Ambassador in Rome, regarding a proposed Italo-Iraqi Treaty of Friendship, proposals regarding the frontier made by Aloisi, and general Italian influence over Iran and Iraq. The volume also includes copies of memoranda and minutes circulated by the League, in addition to correspondence regarding the negotiations in Geneva and Italy, and documents from the Committee of Imperial Defence Standing Official Sub-Committee for Questions Concerning the Middle East.

The volume includes a divider giving a list of correspondence references found in the volume by year. This is placed at the end of the correspondence (folio 1).

Extent and format
1 volume (476 folios)
Arrangement

The papers are arranged in rough chronological order from the rear to the front of the volume.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence for this description commences at the first folio with 1, and terminates at the last folio with 472; these numbers are written in pencil and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. The front and back covers, along with the two leading and two ending flyleaves, have not been foliated.

Written in
English and French in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

Coll 17/15(1) 'Perso-Iraq Relations: Persia-Iraq frontier; Persia's claim in the Shatt-el-Arab' [‎235r] (480/961), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/12/2869, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100074341459.0x000051> [accessed 18 April 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100074341459.0x000051">Coll 17/15(1) 'Perso-Iraq Relations: Persia-Iraq frontier; Persia's claim in the Shatt-el-Arab' [&lrm;235r] (480/961)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100074341459.0x000051">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000602.0x00019b/IOR_L_PS_12_2869_0480.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000602.0x00019b/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image