Skip to item: of 794
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

File 4673/1919 Pt 3 ‘Persian Gulf: Bahrein Mission to England 1919. Political business of Mission’ [‎323r] (33/164)

The record is made up of 1 item (83 folios). It was created in 6 Aug 1919-12 Aug 1920. It was written in English and Arabic. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

The above being the state of mind of the Shaikh of Bahrein and his
advisers, I do not think one may be surprised at the three requests made by
Shaikh Abdullah in London.
To turn to the three points in question.
Point l .—The Civil Commissioner states in his No. 12988, dated 30th
October 1919, to “ Zinneremo,” London, that the matter was for all practical
purposes settled when the Order-in-Council was brought into force. There are
still points, however, over which a ruling is required. As I understand it, the
term “ neighbouring Arab Rulers ” refers to the inhabitants of Qatar Peninsula
and Nejd. Is it intended to refer to the inhabitants of Oman, Kuwait, Zanzibar,
Hadramant, Yemen, etc., the inhabitants of all which places are to be found
here trading at all times ? In other words are local resident subjects of the i
Rulers of Oman, Kuwait, Zanzibar, Hejaz and inhabitants of Hadramant and
Yemen to be considered under the jurisdiction of the Shaikh of Bahrein or
under that of the Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. ? A ruling is required on this point as Shaikh
’Isa certainly thinks he should control them.
Point 2 .—I have nothing to say except that up to the day of his depar
ture, my predecessor was carrying on a correspondence with the Shaikh of
Bahrein over this very subject. The Shaikh had dismissed a member of the
“ Majlis-al-Urfi ” and had appointed another member without the knowledge
or approval of the Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. . The circumstances suggested an attempt to
make a test case to see how far the Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. would be supported.
The Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. contended that under the Order-in-Council he had
every right to be consulted in the matter and refused to recognise “ Majlis-
al-Urfi ” until Shaikh ’Isa withdrew his nomination. My predecessor went
away at this stage of the crises and it has been left for me to settle the tangle.
I certainly consider the Order-in-Council is clear on the subject and should
be insisted on. In the meantime the Majlis-al-Urfi’s sittings have been sus
pended pending settlement of this vexed question.
Point 3. The question of Zubara .—I have been through a great many files
on the subject and have consulted confidentially various local people of
prominence, without, of course, divulging the reasons for my questions. The
conclusions I have arrived at are that it would be distinctly unwise to allow
Shikh Isa to occupy Zubaray Gn the following grounds :—
(a) Shaikh Abdullah bin Jassim of Qatar would strongly resent the
Shaikh of Bahrein again getting a footing on the Qatar
peninsula. He is a weaker man and Zubara in the hands of
Shaikh Isa would be a pistol at his head always.
(b) Shaikh Abdullah bin Jassim would certainly object to the develop
ment of a new port on the peninsula of Qatar since it would at
once divert all trade from Dohad (Bida) to Zubara and he would
not only lose a large amount of revenue at present accruing
from the Customs House A1 Dohah, but would stand every chance
of seeing Dohah entirely disappear as the seaport of Qatar.
(c) Ibn Saud similarly would take offence at a revival of the port of
Zubara under Shaikh Isa’s jurisdiction for like reasons to (b)
above, as such a port would mean the killing of his new trade
centre of O’Jair. It should be noted that the harbour of Zubara
is naturally much better than that of either Dohah or O’Jair, and
with the Shaikh of Bahrein actually compelling all Bahrein trade
to go to the mainland through his port of Zubara, the end of [
both Abdullah bin Jassim’s and Ibn Saud’s ports w^ould be certain
and quick. As matters stand a good deal of coolness already
exists between Ibn Saud and Shaikh Isa owing to the latter
having recently instituted a 5 per cent, tax on goods passing
through Bahrain for O’Jair even though such goods never leave
the Bahrein Customs House. Ibn Saud contends that Shaikh Isa
should only take demurrage charges (or Arthiyeh).
In my opinion the suggestion of Shaikh Isa’s that he be allowed to revive
a ten* year-old controversy should be nipped in the bud. The new move is

About this item

Content

This part contains papers relating to the visit of Mission (deputation) from Bahrein [Bahrain] to the United Kingdom in 1919. It includes correspondence regarding the reception of ‘Abdullah bin ‘Īsá Āl Khalīfah, son of Shaikh Isa of Bahrein, and Abdullah’s son Muhammad-bin-Abdulla by King George V at Buckingham Palace, London, on 6 August 1919.

Much of the correspondence also relates to the reception of ‘Abdullah bin ‘Īsá Āl Khalīfah by Sir Arthur Hirtzel, Assistant Under-Secretary of State for India, on 1 September 1919, and a subsequent letter from Abdullah to Hirtzel, in which Abdullah states that he has been instructed by his father to make four proposals to the British Government regarding Bahrein, and the response of the British Government to these proposals.

The main correspondents include: the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. ; the Civil Commissioner, Baghdad (‘Political, Baghdad’); Shaikh Sir Isa Bin Ali Al Khalifah, Ruler of Bahrain; the Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. , Bahrain; the Secretary to the Government of India Foreign and Political Department; the Political Resident A senior ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul General) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Residency. in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. ; and the Deputy Political Resident A senior ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul General) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Residency. in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. .

The part includes a letter in Arabic from Sir Isa bin Ali al Khalifah, Ruler of Bahrain, to King George V (folios 385 and 386), which has been translated into English.

Extent and format
1 item (83 folios)
Written in
English and Arabic in Latin and Arabic script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

File 4673/1919 Pt 3 ‘Persian Gulf: Bahrein Mission to England 1919. Political business of Mission’ [‎323r] (33/164), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/850/3, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100074780349.0x000039> [accessed 25 April 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100074780349.0x000039">File 4673/1919 Pt 3 ‘Persian Gulf: Bahrein Mission to England 1919. Political business of Mission’ [&lrm;323r] (33/164)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100074780349.0x000039">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002e8/IOR_L_PS_10_850_0658.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0002e8/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image