Skip to item: of 690
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

Manuscript of Persia and the Persian Question (Continued) [‎28r] (55/690)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 file (218 folios). It was created in 1890. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

® I
■ Afl-i havo nTiimrlinrn nhowu, [he Turks in these parts are disposed
to be very nasty towards the^ Persians, against whom they have
cherished a particular grudge" ever since the cession of the poJ|t of W
Mohammerah to the latter by the joint Anglo-Pussian commission /
more than forty years ago. They are jealous of the intrusion of
any other power upon the Shat-el-Arab; and they are still more
jealous of the rising fortunes of Mohammerah itself, which, in the
event of any considerable development of the Karun trade route,
will divert much of the traffic that now finds its way to Busrah and
Bagdad, and^ through their customhouses^ to and from the Persian
interior. Accordingly they adopt every means in their power of
hampering, irritating, and menacing their rivals’ interests; the most
conspicuous illustration of this attitude being the erection of a large
fort upon a shelving sandspit at Fao, absolutely commanding the
entrance to the Shat-el-Arab on the south. By a clause in the
Treaty of Erzerum (1847) Turkey and Persia, the two contracting
powers, bound themselves by a reciprocal engagement not to erect
fortifications on either bank of the estuary, Great Britain and Russia
being the two witnessing parties; and the action of the Turks is
consequently an initial violation of this agreement, which is not
atoned for by their complacent invitation to the Persians to go and do
likewise. In 1886 they commenced the construction of the fort, and
an spite 6 f frequent protests since, both from the English and Per
sian Governments, met by the traditional diplomatic disclaimer from
Constantinople, they have now completed it to a point at which the guns
•only are wanting to render it a serious and intolerable menace both
to their Persian neighbours and to the interests of the British trade
and shipping engaged upon the Mesopotamian rivers. Some time
ugo an English telegraph clerk from the neighbouring telegraph
station at Fao landed from a boat at the fort, meeting with no inter
ruption, and succeeding in making drawings and plans of the fortifi
cations. When this vagary was discovered the Turks were furious,
and have since fanatically excluded every prying eye. But from
the deck of each passing steamer enough can be seen to show the
actual progress of affairs, and to reduce to their proper proportions
■the glib denials from Stamboul; and should the armament of this
fort be proceeded with, in direct infringement of treaty stipulations [i+ut
which England is pledged to safeguard, and .to -the obviuuo pwil erf- s ^
British shipping whose presence and safefy on the Tigris are guaran- ^
teed by firmans fifty years old, I can conceive that no other alterna-
tive will present itself to the British Government but to knock the
fort to pieces, and teach the Ottoman Government that there is a
limit to the endurance even of Ottoman impertinence. When I add
that'llthwt-tlio last few months the Turks karv also commenced to
build two other forts in the immediate neighbourhood of Mohamme-
<rah higher up the river* mnd that daily and weekly they place every
obstacle that a perverse''ingenuity can suggest in the way of the
'(English) Euphrates and Tigris Steam Navigation Company, who
own the right to ply with two vessels between Busrah and Bagdad,
it will be seen that to represent their action as dictated by any
•other spirit than one of provocation both to Persia and this country is
impossible. Why a power which only only stands upon its legs in
Europe because England is supposed to be propping it up from
behind should be allowed to kick the shins of its supporter in Asia,
passes my ability to determine.
A little beyond the new fort is the joint British and Turkish Tele
graph Station at Fao, where the cable of the Gulf section of the
Indo-European Telegraph Department comes up from the sea, and is
prolonged by an overland wire to Constantinople. Two buildings or
sheds accommodate the respective officials of the two nationalities,
and recently provided a further illustration of the suspicious hostility
of the Turks. For when the English superintendent began to build
a low wall round his shed to keep off the encroachments of the river,,
the Sublime Porte, which is ready to detect a menace in any pro
ceedings but its own, formally protested against the fortification on
its territory of a hostile place of arms l

About this item

Content

This file contains sections of the handwritten manuscript of the book Persia and the Persian Question by George Nathaniel Curzon. These papers come as part of the full handwritten draft of the book that comprises the shelfmarks Mss Eur F111/30-32. The printed edition of the book can be found in the file with the shelfmark Mss Eur F111/33.

Eventually published in 1892, the papers in this file cover the ancient and modern history, geography, and social and political aspects of Persia during the late nineteenth century when George Curzon temporarily lived in Persia. The manuscript also discusses the Russian and British presence in Persia and the author's views on the two countries' respective strategies in the country. The papers also include some of George Curzon's own travel writing while in Persia.

Extent and format
1 file (218 folios)
Arrangement

The papers are arranged by chapter as part of a handwritten manuscript.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: this file consists of two physical volumes. The foliation sequence commences at the front cover of volume one (ff 1-220) and terminates at the inside back cover of volume two (ff 221-345); these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. An additional foliation sequence is present in parallel between ff 2-344; these numbers are also written in pencil, but are not circled.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

Manuscript of Persia and the Persian Question (Continued) [‎28r] (55/690), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F111/32, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100076276758.0x000038> [accessed 19 April 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100076276758.0x000038">Manuscript of <em>Persia and the Persian Question</em> (Continued) [&lrm;28r] (55/690)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100076276758.0x000038">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x00033a/Mss Eur F111_32_0055.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x00033a/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image