Skip to item: of 644
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

File 7251/1920 Pt 3 'Arabia: Situation and Policy; Agenda for Inter Departmental Committee Meetings' [‎208v] (53/268)

The record is made up of 1 item (133 folios). It was created in 25 Jun 1920-4 Dec 1920. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

12
ilir. Garbett pointed out that in any case we could not engage in advance the
future Mesopotamian Government.
Sir John Tiiley agreed that the most suitable occasion for reconsidering this subsidy
would be the signature of peace with Turkey.
The Meeting was of opinion that, subject to India Oihce and Treasury concurrence,
the 265,0001 already paid as subsidy to Ibn Saud should be met from the Mesopotamian
surplus,’ and that Ibn Sand’s subsidy should continue to be paid till the signature of
peace from current Mesopotamian revenues.
Future Policy as to Subsidies.
Major Young observed that His Majesty’s Government were endeavouring to obtain
a “ self-denying ordinance ” from other Powers as regards Arabia. They were asking for
a special position in the Peninsula on account of its proximity to the Empiies \ital
maritime routes. The question was whether we could maintain that position without
expenditure in the shape of subsidies. India and His Majest\ s Gq\e ninent had felt up
to now that their interests justified the payment of certain subsidies, ancl if, as a lesult
of the Peace Treaty, His Majesty’s Government were to be given a special position in
the Peninsula, the case for continuing them would, if anything, be strengthened.
Sir John Tilley concurred.
In reply to a question by Mr. Phillips, Major Young considered that the appoint
ment of the Britisii-Moslem representative at Mecca was an exactly parallel case and
amounted to an acknowledgment by the Treasury of the principle of His Majesty s
Government’s interests in the pilgrimage question. (Mr. Phillips dissented.) The
whole question of subsidies in the Peninsula was, moreover, inextricably involved as
regards the various rulers. The relations of His Majesty’s Government with Hussein,
Ibn Saud and the Idrisi, for example, were mutually interdependent.
Mr. Phillips suggested that in spite of this it might be possible and more
satisfactory for His Majesty’s Government to back one ruler only.
Major Young agreed that this seemed more likely to be successful at first sight,
but pointed out that the Eastern Committee had discussed the question on various
occasions and had failed to arrive at a decision to concentrate on one subsidy. Ihe
Treasury had been represented at all these discussions.
Mr. Garbett added that the question was not only one of maintaining our special
position in Arabia but went a good deal further. We were the greatest Moslem Power
in the world, and it was of the highest importance to the interests of the Empire as a
whole that the pilgrim routes should be kept open. Failing this, unrest in all colonies
containing Moslems would ensue. He considered that subsidies should take, in the
future, the less offensive form of payments for services rendered, he., services in
connection with keeping open the pilgrim routes. He suggested also that a ratio
might be observed in fixing the amount of the various subsidies in the same way as had
been done by Colonel Wilson, who had suggested fixing liashid’s subsidy at half Ibn
Saud’s.
Mr. Phillips enquired how many British subjects actually used the pilgrim routes,
and suggested that if we kept one route open—by sea—we were really meeting our
responsibilities in the matter.
Major Young pointed out that it was not so much a question of the routes as of
the actual security of the holy places themselves—Mecca and Medina.
Mr. Phillips asked what the probable result would be if all the subsidies were
withdrawn ?
Mr. Garbett considered that this would in all probability lead to the closing of the
pilgrim routes and thus to general unrest, not only in Arabia but in India and in our
other Moslem dependencies, as well as in those of other Powers.
Major T oung observed that a revival of Turcophil propaganda might also ensue. ^
Moreover, in the event of a Wahabi invasion of the Hedjaz, causing dissatisfaction.

About this item

Content

This part of the volume contains correspondence and other papers concerning relations between Nejd, Transjordan Used in three contexts: the geographical region to the east of the River Jordan (literally ‘across the River Jordan’); a British protectorate (1921-46); an independent political entity (1946-49) now known as Jordan , Hejaz, Yemen, and the Idrisi state, as well as policy in Arabia more generally. Correspondence comes from officials at the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. , Foreign Office, War Office, the Political Residency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, established in the provinces and regions considered part of, or under the influence of, British India. in Aden, the Office of the High Commissioner in Palestine, the Office of the High Commissioner in Cairo, the Office of the High Commissioner in Iraq, and the British Agency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, headed by an agent. at Jeddah. Further correspondence comes from King Hussein [Ḥusayn bin ‘Alī al-Hāshimī] of the Hejaz, his sons Emir Abdullah [ʿAbdullāh bin Ḥusayn al-Hāshimī] and Emir Feisal [Fayṣal bin Ḥusayn bin ‘Alī al-Hāshimī], the French Ambassador in London, and officials of the German and United States Governments.

This part deals with relations between Nejd and the neighbouring territories of Transjordan Used in three contexts: the geographical region to the east of the River Jordan (literally ‘across the River Jordan’); a British protectorate (1921-46); an independent political entity (1946-49) now known as Jordan , the Hejaz, Yemen, and the Idrisi state. Matters covered include the supply of Arms to the Idrisi, control of Hodeidah and the proposed withdrawal of the British garrison there, the British subsidy to Ibn Saud [‘Abd al-‘Azīz bin ‘Abd al-Raḥmān bin Fayṣal Āl Sa‘ūd]of Nejd, efforts to reach an agreement between the Hejaz and Nejd, trouble along the Transjordan Used in three contexts: the geographical region to the east of the River Jordan (literally ‘across the River Jordan’); a British protectorate (1921-46); an independent political entity (1946-49) now known as Jordan boundary involving the Ikhwan and local tribes, and future British policy in the region.

Extent and format
1 item (133 folios)
Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

File 7251/1920 Pt 3 'Arabia: Situation and Policy; Agenda for Inter Departmental Committee Meetings' [‎208v] (53/268), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/937/2, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100079424931.0x000019> [accessed 29 March 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100079424931.0x000019">File 7251/1920 Pt 3 'Arabia: Situation and Policy; Agenda for Inter Departmental Committee Meetings' [&lrm;208v] (53/268)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100079424931.0x000019">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x000341/IOR_L_PS_10_937_0424.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x000341/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image