Skip to item: of 316
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

'File 8/67 MUSCAT STATE AFFAIRS: MUSCAT – OMAN TREATY.' [‎119r] (242/316)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 volume (154 folios). It was created in 14 Oct 1920-27 Jul 1934. It was written in English and Arabic. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

I hb
-
8
to inform you of my intention. Before your arrival I received s
communication from the Council in which they hove accused the
people of Khoudh of murdering Said "bin ICahmis according to the
statement of the trackers, but it was not proved^and I do not
see any reason for such an accusation as there was no
antecedent to lead to such a crime. T would like to have fifty
of them to take oath or to have the case compromised if possible.
T f you approve and have no objection please instruct Ssiyid
ITosor to send the relatives of the murdererd man to me at
Khaudh. If you do not like that the case be settled in that
manner G od T s order will govern all and every I-uharnmadan should
adhere to it.
ilote by H.H.
I'his is the second reply of bheikh. is a to me.
letter dated 17th -onodi XT, 1351 ( p from !:.’T.38ij,id
or id 'b in Toimur to Shaikh Ies kin Sr.lih.ul H- ritai.
’Xith reference to the letter which sexs you sent to my Council
of ‘Wencv in connection with Said Mn irho.ie's r.urder which was
■v* — v
proved by verificotion of tracks by ^efirs cjfinot three
individuols of irheudh namely lubarsk bin Omoir, Xnrr.i bin ifnemis
md .J-i bin Selim whose times were communiccted to you,
understend from your letter thet the statement of Tafire enould
not be relied upon. In reply I say that the Sham is the chief
foundation and accepted by every Muslim. Verifying of tracks is
one of the established proofs. Do you reject it entirely? Tf so
we should not be held responsible if such incidents happen m
future. In any cose the accused should be first arrested ana
then enquiries should be made into the cate. There is no doubt
that the murderers and his accomplices do not admit their crime.
You should better take the necessary action in the matter. If
you have nothing further to say besides the 3 courses which you
have already informed me please let me know so that T may be
sure about them. Procrastination should not be made ir. such cases
nd there is no need to state more than this to you.

About this item

Content

This volume concerns relations between the Sultan of Muscat and Oman and the tribes of interior Oman. The volume contains multiple copies of notes produced in October 1920 by the Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. and Consul at Muscat, providing a British perspective on the history of political affairs in Muscat and Oman from the late 18th century to the present day (ff 6-22, ff 49-53 and ff 56-60). The notes attempt to summarise the underlying causes of the tense relations between the Sultan and the Omani tribes, before going on to document events during the period October 1919-October 1920, which culminated with the re-establishment of peaceful relations, following the conclusion of an agreement between the two parties (the Treaty of Sib, concluded on 25 September 1920). Related items include multiple copies of the English text of the 1920 agreement (ff 23-26, ff 53-55, and ff 60-62), and a Photostat copy of the Arabic text of the concluding part of the Treaty (f 154).

The volume also documents the Sultan's relations with the Omani tribes in the years following the treaty. There is a series of letters written in 1924 between the Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. and Shaikh Isa bin Saleh [Shaikh ‘Īsá bin Ṣāliḥ al-Ḥārthī], who makes a request to import ammunition and protests against taxes that he claims contravene the Treaty of Sib. The correspondence dated 1932-1934 largely concerns the murder of a Muscat Government clerk at Sib, and the Sultan's frustration with the evasive response of Shaikh Isa bin Saleh on the matter. Also discussed in this part of the volume is the question of whether the Treaty of Sib will be renewed.

In addition to the treaty text mentioned above, the Arabic language material mainly consists of correspondence between the British and Muscat authorities and various shaikhs and subjects of interior Oman (English translations are included).The volume includes copies of correspondence originally written in 1919. There is no material covering the periods 1922-1923, 1925-1931, and no material dated after 1934, with the exception of a note at the rear of the volume, which is dated 16 October 1961.

Extent and format
1 volume (154 folios)
Arrangement

The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the front to the rear of the volume.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the inside back cover with 156; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.

Written in
English and Arabic in Latin and Arabic script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

'File 8/67 MUSCAT STATE AFFAIRS: MUSCAT – OMAN TREATY.' [‎119r] (242/316), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/R/15/6/264, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100070535088.0x00002b> [accessed 8 May 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100070535088.0x00002b">'File 8/67 MUSCAT STATE AFFAIRS: MUSCAT – OMAN TREATY.' [&lrm;119r] (242/316)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100070535088.0x00002b">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000881.0x000027/IOR_R_15_6_264_0242.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000881.0x000027/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image