Skip to item: of 156
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

'Persia' [‎38v] (76/156)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 file (78 folios). It was created in 1 Dec 1879. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

74
In addition to the scheme of the Karan river,
there is another project for opening up communica
tions from the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. with the interior of
Persia, viz., the construction of a railway line from
Bagdad or Mohammerah to Ispahan and Teheran.
It seems unnecessary here to do more than merely
allude to the concession for the construction of
railways in Persia granted by the Shall to Baron
Beuter in 1872, inasmuch as that concession was
shortly afterwards cancelled by His Majesty, al
though on pretexts the validity of which have never
been admitted by the British Government or Baron
Beuter. In November 1878,* the Persian Govern
ment offered a concession to the Baron for a rail
way from Mohammerah to Teheran on the same
terms that had been granted to a French Company
for a line from Besht to Teheran. This offer Baron
Beuter declined to accept, on the ground that he
could not undertake any work in Persia, except
under the general concession of 1872. He, at the
same time, lodged a formal protest at Teheran
against any concession being granted to any other
parties. This protest Her Majesty’s Minister at
Teheran supported.
Baron Keuterf appears shortly afterwards to have
somewhat modified his views. On the 1st February
1879, he addressed a letter to the Foreign Office,
declaring his readiness to make a railway from
Mohammerah, or some other point in the south of
Persia, “if the Indian Government will give an
“ annual subsidy towards the interest of the
“ capital required.” This proposal having been
referred by the Foreign Office^ for any observations
which Lord Cranbrook might have to make, His
Lordship’s views were expressed as follows in Sir
L. Mallet’s letter§ of the 1st March 1879. “ The
“ Indian Government have, on more than one
t( occasion, expressed its willingness to encourage
“ any practical scheme for opening communications
u in the south of Persia, and Baron Beuter’s present
“ proposal shall be referred for the consideration of
the Viceroy in Council. But, before taking this
“ step it is essential that Lord Cranbrook should
“ be informed whether the Imperial Government
*• is prepared to give any support to the undertaking
“ On this point His Lordship desires to refer Lord
“ Salisbury to Lord Derby’s Despatch to Mr. T.
“ Thomson, No. 12, dated 27th February 1877. If
“ that Despatch expresses the present views of Her
“ Majesty’s Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs
“ and the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury,
“ further reference to India is unnecessary, as there
“ are no grounds upon which the burden of a
“ subsidy, such as Baron Beuter desires, could be
“ thrown upon the revenues of that country, inde-
pendently of the co-operation of the Imperial
“ Government.”
Consequent upon these remarks the Foreign
Office* consulted the Treasury as to whether the
Board were prewired to offer any contributions out
of Imperial Funds towards the subsidy desired by
the Karim should be thrown open to Russian
and other steamers alike. This point is worthy
of consideration when the moment arrives,
provided the “ most favoured nation” clause
in the Russian Commercial Treaty of Turko-
manchaie can be got over.
Note .—The circumstances connected with
Baron Reuter’s concession were fully sum
marized in the memorandum by Mr. San
derson, dated 10th August 1878. Vide
Home Correspoudence, 1879, No. 269.
* Home Correspondemce, 1878, No. 872.
f Home Correspondence, 1879, No. 107.
f As above.
§ As above.
* Home Correspondence, 1879, No. 269.

About this item

Content

The memorandum is divided into the following chapter headings:

  • 'General Status of Persia', ff 2r-12;
  • 'Persia and Herat', ff 12v-24r;
  • 'Persia and Seistan [Sīstān]', ff 24r-31v;
  • 'Persia and Kohuk', ff 31v-35;
  • 'Persia and the Navigation of the Karun [Kārūn] River', ff 35v-39r;
  • 'Persia and her integrity', ff 39r-47;
  • 'Persia and Merv', ff 47v-52v;
  • 'Continuation of General Status of Persia', ff 52v-61;
  • 'Appendices', ff 63-78.

'General Status of Persia' provides a geographic description of the Kingdom including details of its boundaries, rivers, and transportation links. It also includes an outline of its demography, and its revenue by province. Military matters are also covered in this section; this includes an in-depth look at the Persian army — its pay and composition — and a look at the employment of British officers in Persia. This section concludes with a narrative of Persia's modern history from the sixteenth century.

'Persia and Herat' describes the extent to which the province's boundaries can be defined, and provides a brief description of each district within; Ghorian, Sabzawar, Farah, Bakwa, Kurak, and Obeh. It also includes a description of the town of Herat, and information on the province's demography and climate. The section also provides detailed coverage of the tribes in the region. The development of British policy towards Herat is explained through the use of select correspondence. This includes the relative merits for Britain in either maintaining Herat's independence, or supporting Afghan or Persian rule; extensive reference is made to the Treaty of Paris (1857).

'Persia and Seistan' also provides a geographic description of the province, along with information on its administrative divisions, climate, and transportation links. Its main purpose however is to outline the development of British attitudes concerning the governance of this province; should it be overseen by Afghanistan or Persia? To provide context, it covers the historical basis for the two competing claims. It concludes by describing the British arbitration of the matter in 1871-72 by General Frederick John Goldsmid, and its outcome; summaries of the statements provided by the Afghan and Persian sides are included.

'Persia and Kohuk' explains how Persia has disputed the award of this province to Khelat by General Goldsmid in 1871, and British reluctance to amend the award in favour of Persia.

'Persia and the Navigation of the Karun River' outlines British efforts to open up the Karun River for steam navigation. It explains that Russian success in improving transportation infrastructure in the north of Persia — in contrast to British failure in the south — is seen to be putting British trade at a disadvantage; the Karun River is seen as having the best potential for resolving this. The prospects for the construction of a railway in southern Persia are also briefly examined.

'Persia and her integrity' details the development of a diplomatic understanding from 1834 between Britain and Russia, in which both powers established their mutual interest in the maintenance of the territorial integrity of Persia. It chiefly concerns British suspicions that Russian activities in central Asia do not match their professed intentions towards Persia (i.e. British fears that Russia is encroaching on central Asia).

'Persia and Merv', in addition to providing an overview of the region's history and ancient settlements, considers what the British consider to be the encroachment of Russia on Persia's northern borders; the British consider any potential Russian occupation of Merv to be a threat, and it is explained that Persian control is preferred.

'Continuation of General Status of Persia' concentrates on British concerns over increases in Russian influence at the Persian Court in Tehran; the British fear Persia becoming a vassal of Russia and facilitating Russian expansion towards Afghanistan. It therefore discusses the extent to which Britain should take advantage of Persian overtures to establish friendly relations with that power in order to prevent this scenario. It also briefly discusses Persian designs on Bahrain, and the desirability — for Britain — in maintaining its status as an independent state, in addition to emphasizing the need to maintain Britain's protectorate role in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. . Topics also included in this section, but covered in less detail include: the conference of consular powers on the Resident in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. ; the development of telegraph lines in Persia; and negotiations respecting the demarcation of the Persian-Turkish border.

The memorandum is signed by Owen Tudor Burne of the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. .

The appendix at the back is divided eight sections as follows:

  • I. 'Employment of British Officers with the Persian Army', f 63;
  • II. A selection of memoranda (dated 20 July-24 December 1868) concerning the need to strengthen British influence over Persia, and the means available to achieve it, ff 63v-64;
  • III. A selection of memoranda (dated 10-30 October 1868) on the possibility of employing British officers with the Persian Army, f 65;
  • IV. 'The Policy of Great Britain towards Persia, ff 66-69;
  • V. Instructions given to Major-General Sir Henry Creswicke Rawlingson as Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary A diplomatic representative who ranks below an ambassador. The term can be shortened to 'envoy'. to the Court of Persia, dated 4 August 1859, ff 68-69;
  • VI. 'Outline Sketch by Colonel Burne of the Shah of Persia's Visit to England, 1873, ff 69-72;
  • VII. 'Note by Colonel Burne on the Persian Army, 20th December 1871', ff 72-73;
  • VIII. 'Abstract of Events in Persia, Afghanistan, &c. from 1722 to the present period', ff 73v-78.
Extent and format
1 file (78 folios)
Arrangement

The file is arranged into eight chapters — outlined in a table of contents on f 1 — with an appendix at the end.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence for this description commences at f 1A and terminates at f 78, as it is part of a larger physical volume; these numbers are written in pencil, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. Pagination: the file also contains an original printed pagination sequence.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

'Persia' [‎38v] (76/156), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/18/C28, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100025538941.0x00004d> [accessed 29 May 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100025538941.0x00004d">'Persia' [&lrm;38v] (76/156)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100025538941.0x00004d">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000833.0x000062/IOR_L_PS_18_C28_0076.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000833.0x000062/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image