File 4722/1918 Pt 1 'Mesopotamia: administration of policy and situation' [308v] (632/687)
The record is made up of 1 volume (326 folios). It was created in 23 Oct 1918-2 Nov 1919. It was written in English, French and Arabic. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
■i
5. In any case we must set our faces against the admission of the slightest
Turkish element or participation in the administration. In this connection, I
should mention that when I was in Cairo it was suggested that,, as events were
shaping, we might be obliged to decide to come to some compromise with
Turkey at any moment; I also learnt there of Sherif Faisal’s secret overtures
to the Turks; and when asked my opinion I expressed the view that if in the
last resort we were compelled to come to some compromise with Turkey I did
not consider that the retention of nominal Turkish suzerainty need be considered
altogether incompatible with the realisation of our practical aims, always
provided that the country were safeguarded against the leasr control or
interference by Turkey in the administration. As cases in point we have the
precedent of Egypt and the more pertinent one of Koweit. The fact is that
the bulk of the people of the country are not concerned with abstract theories
or niceties of international principle; for example, as long as the Shaikh of
Koweit feels assured that his interests are under our practical protection, and
are safe in our hands, he does not trouble his head as to whether in the distance
Turkish suzerainty exists or not. I think the position would be the same in
the case of the inhabitants of Iraq, where nine-tenths of them are altogether
inarticulate, and all they are concerned with is the manner of their treatment
by the Government actually in control of Baghdad. As regards the remaining
tenth, who are capable of understanding the real issues, they 'would, of course,
not be completely reassured (supposing that the fiction of Turkish suzerainty
were being maintained) unless they were absolutely safeguarded against the
participation of Turkey in the administration. I assume, therefore, that we are on
common ground in considering that if the Turks were to be allowed to retain
the suzerainty of Mesopotamia (minus Basrah) they must, at any rate, be
completely eliminated from the administration, and that it must be our mission
to ensure that Iraq obtains the administration which the country needs and
which her future demands. There must be no Turkish Commissioner and no
Turkish flag. A special flag must be devised.
fl. Alluding for a moment to the question of relative status, as between
the Basrah and Baghdad Vilayets respectively, it is my very definite opinion
that a homogeneous administration in all practical aspects is not in any way
incompatible with a technical difference of political status, and that it is
essential in the interests of the country that the administration of both
v ilayets should be uniform, that of the Basrah Vilayet being brought into line
with Baghdad in due course.
i. In considering the precise form of the administration there are several
altei natives to be weighed in the balance, and attached to each alternative are
suosidiai} difficulties which need consideration. For the moment we wull
consider the Baghdad Vilayet only, on the hypothesis that Basrah Vilayet can
be made to conform to it at a convenient juncture.
o. j ug question ol me ^ Arab laqade ’ offers no insurmountable difficulties
0 fiV 1 . mn( ; Ihe essential problem is the determination of status to be
assigned to the province of Iraq. It is agreed that the administration should
be under British guidance, and the more complete the British control can be,
the better for the country. In fact, unless it is assured the country has no
fuiuie, for it would be impossible to get money for its development unless
investors are sat.sfied that their interests are fully safeguarded, a condition
” cannot > assured except under protective British supervision. How is
cat supeivision to be achieved ? The most satisfactory solution would seem
„ If g f™ en b I f Hlgh Commissioner assisted by a Council, formed
]u clt . y ot , t , 1 . e Heads most im P orta ut Departments of State, and partly of
pmsentative non-olficial members from among the inhabitants. But the
Joieign relations o such a government must obviously lie in British hands,
and it would thus be practically a British protectorate.
p r! lca B 11 " ailaa gement could be achieved and recognised by the
’pj 8 ,' e an( ^ 00( ’ j)U t if not, then the existence of a titular native ruler
won d become a necessity I do not think it would be impossible to find one,
nm the difficulty is that il the administration were given such a form it might
About this item
- Content
The volume contains correspondence, memoranda, reports, telegrams and minutes regarding the administration of, and situation in, Mesopotamia [Iraq] following the Asia Minor Agreement of 1916, more commonly known as the Sykes-Picot Agreement, between the French and British governments, and the Anglo-French Declaration of November 1918. The volume also concerns the subject of self-determination in Persia [Iran].
The papers notably cover:
- Discussion of advance interpretations of the 1916 Agreement
- The Anglo-French Declaration of November 1918, which publicised their intentions and policy in the former Ottoman territories of Syria and Iraq
- Presentation of the 1918 Declaration to the President of the United States of America by the French Ambassador to the US, Jean Adrien Antoine Jules Jusserand
- Disagreement between the British and French visions of the future administration of Mesopotamia
- The situation in southern Kurdistan
- The 1919 Paris Peace Conference
- Apprehensions of the Baghdad Jewish community about the tenor of the Anglo-French Declaration, including a petition to the Civil Commissioner, Baghdad, requesting to be made subjects of the British Crown
- Reaction to the Declaration from the across the Arab world
- Disagreement among the British over the form that Britain’s control in Mesopotamia should take
- The views of the principal sheikhs [shaikhs] of Mesopotamia on the 1918 Agreement
- Discussion among British officials of the benefits of control over Mesopotamia and the view of the Civil Commissioner, Baghdad, Arnold Talbot Wilson, on the situation in Mesopotamia
- Discussion of the potential candidates for the head of the new state of Iraq
- Reports on consultations with political and religious leaders and inhabitants from across Iraq on the future Government of Iraq
- The views of Sir Percy Cox and Arnold Wilson on the situation in Mesopotamia
- The question of the future political status of Mesopotamia, including the views of British officers serving in Syria and the Hejaz
- Discussion of the question of Iraqi self-determination.
Notable documents in this volume include:
- Text by Sir Percy Cox regarding ‘The Future of Mesopotamia’ (ff 308-310 and ff 270-272)
- Extracts from The Times , 26 November 1819, including a series of articles under the title ‘The Arab Campaign’ (ff 230-232)
- The statutes for the independence of Iraq (ff 127-130)
- A memorandum by Major W H Young regarding the future of Mesopotamia (ff 99-112)
- Copies of ‘Self-determination in Iraq’ in Arabic (ff 75-97) and English (ff 57-73).
The principal correspondents are: the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. , Political Department; the Governor-General of India; the Civil Commissioner, Baghdad; the Military Governor and Political Officer, Baghdad; Government of India, Military Department, the French Ambassador to the United States; and the British Embassy, Paris.
The volume includes a divider, which gives the subject number, the year the subject file was opened, the subject heading, and a list of correspondence references by year. This is placed at the back of the correspondence.
- Extent and format
- 1 volume (326 folios)
- Arrangement
The contents of the volume are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the volume.
The subject 4722 (Mesopotamia) consists of ten volumes, IOR/L/PS/10/755-764. The volumes are divided into twelve parts, with parts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11 and 12 comprising one volume each. Part 10 is missing. Part 7, entitled ‘Mesopotamia: Sir A. Wilson’s invitation to Syrian Baghdadis’, was transferred to File 5268/20 Parts 1 and 2 (see IOR/L/PS/10/913).
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the first folio with 1 and terminates at the last folio with 334; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. Multiple intermittent additional mixed foliation/pagination sequences are also present. The foliation sequence does not include the front and back covers, nor does it include the leading and ending flyleaves. The sequence contains two anomalies: f 181a and f 181b.
- Written in
- English, French and Arabic in Latin and Arabic script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
File 4722/1918 Pt 1 'Mesopotamia: administration of policy and situation' [308v] (632/687), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/755, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100188328445.0x0000a2> [accessed 9 June 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100188328445.0x0000a2
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100188328445.0x0000a2">File 4722/1918 Pt 1 'Mesopotamia: administration of policy and situation' [‎308v] (632/687)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100188328445.0x0000a2"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x000289/IOR_L_PS_10_755_0634.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x000289/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- IOR/L/PS/10/755
- Title
- File 4722/1918 Pt 1 'Mesopotamia: administration of policy and situation'
- Pages
- front, back, spine, edge, head, tail, front-i, i-r:i-v, 1r:127v, 128ar, 128r:175v, 176ar, 176r:181v, 181ar:181av, 181cr, 181br:181bv, 182r:182v, 186r:229v, 232v:325v, 327r:334v, ii-r:ii-v, back-i
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
![File 4722/1918 Pt 1 'Mesopotamia: administration of policy and situation' [‎308v] (632/687) File 4722/1918 Pt 1 'Mesopotamia: administration of policy and situation' [‎308v] (632/687)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x000289/IOR_L_PS_10_755_0634.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)