Skip to item: of 502
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

'Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874' [‎55v] (115/502)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 volume (249 folios). It was created in 1 Nov 1873-14 Feb 1874. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

3. The Resident of Baroda in his final reply, takes exception generally to
the judicial proceedings, and makes a detailed comment on them, and on tliG
proceedings of the Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). in this, and other cases. He also forwards transla
tions of some depositions taken after the Commission left Baroda, tending to
throw discredit on the judicial investigation held before the Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). authorities.
O pinion and G teneral R emarks by the C ommission.
In this case it is impossible to form a satisfactory judgment. On the one
hand, the Resident is evidently of opinion that the judicial proceedings, which
have been placed before the Commission by the Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). are perfectly useless and
that they were framed subsequently to the punishment inflicted. He also, it is
clear, entirely disbelieves the facts stated in the different depositions. On the
other hand, there can be no doubt that the death of Tatia Powar was very suspicious;
and, as far as the Commission can judge, he seems to have died either from
cholera, or the effects of poison. In an English court of justice more definite
evidence would have been required before the alleged poisoning could have been
held to be proved ; and certainly more evidence would have been required before
the guilt would have been held to have been established against the eight
prisoners. But the Commission does not feel itself in a position to sit as a Court
of Appeal, to determine whether prisoners have been properly or improperly con
victed by the judicial courts of the Gaekwar. In this instance the formal pro
ceedings held on the trial, have been placed before the Commission, by the Judge
before whom they were held. This officer states that the depositions and state
ments were taken down in his presence with due formality, and all'the proceed
ings were completed before the infliction of the punishment. The matter was
then fully explained to His Highness the Oaekwar, who himself, as he told the
Resident, ordered the punishment to be inflicted; though under the circumstances,
he would have been justified, he alleges in passing sentence of death on the
prisoners.
There seems to be no particular reason why, if suspicions were
not entertained against the eight prisoners, they should have been singled out as
the alleged perpetrators of a cold-blooded murder. And whether Tatia Powar was
really poisoned or not, and whether the eight persons convicted of being con
cerned in his death, were really guilty or not, the Commission is not convinced
that the Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). authorities have any doubt on the matter. It is much to he
regretted that the flogging was carried out so brutally or carelessly, that one man
died at once from the effect of such treatment; but bearing in mind that under
the laws now in force in England and British India, garotters and other offenders
are punished, and very properly, with severe flogging, the Commission does not
feel called on to condemn flogging in Baroda, when adjudged as a punishment
for heinous offences. In this particular case the Gaekwar might be invited to
enquire and inform Government how it was that a man who is now alleged to
have been delicate, should have been so severely flogged as to have died under
^ If- an ^ r care l essn ess, or needless severity could be substantiated against
the subordinate who inflicted the punishment, or those whose duty it was to see
it carried out, due notice should be taken of their conduct. All the proceedings,
epositions, and the remarks by the Resident, will be found in the proper place.

About this item

Content

Report of the Baroda Enquiry Commission on the administration of the government of Malharrao, Gaekwar of Baroda. The Commission comprised Richard John Meade (President), Edward William Ravenscroft, Mumtazul Dowlah Nawab An honorific title; an official acting as a provincial deputy ruler in South Asia; or a significant Muslim landowner in nineteenth century India. Faiz Ali Khan, Colonel Alfred Thomas Etheridge and Thomas Duncan Mackenzie (Secretary).

The report comprises a letter from the members of the Baroda Enquiry Commission to the Secretary to the Government of India, Foreign Department presenting their report on the results of the proceedings and submitting copies of correspondence, reports and statements relative to the enquiry (ff 5-19):

Appendix A, Part I

  • Schedules I-III: Complaints and grievances against the Gaekwar's Government from individuals and groups (ff 21-78).
  • Appendix B, Schedules I-III: Cases of complaint and grievance which the commission did not look into during the enquiry (ff 79-81).
  • Appendix C: Letter from Colonel Richard John Meade, President, Special Commission of Enquiry on Baroda Affairs, to Colonel Robert Phayre, Resident at Baroda, 1 November 1873 (ff 82-83).
  • Appendix D: Translation of an amended notice issued by the Resident to complainants desirous of appearing before the Baroda Enquiry Commission (ff 84-85).
  • Appendix E: Schedules presented to the Commission along with Colonel Phayre's introductory statement regarding them. (ff 86-131).
  • Appendix F: Letter No. 1128 of 1873 from Colonel Phayre to the President, Baroda Commission regarding the cases already submitted to the Commission, the List of undisposed petitions to be attended to by the Resident which could be used as additional cases if required and the statements that he had yet to make on cases under enquiry by the Commission (ff 132-133).
  • Appendix G, Schedule I: Statements from witnesses with cross examination statements from the Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). on behalf of the Gaekwar and statements from the Resident as to the accuracy of the information provided (ff 134-229).

Appendix Part II (ff 231-245)

Extent and format
1 volume (249 folios)
Physical characteristics

Foliation: the main sequence of foliation consists of a small pencil number in the top front right hand corner of each folio enclosed in a circle.

There is also an original sequence of foliation which consists of larger pencil numbers also in the top front right hand corner of folios, however the sequence is not consistent and some of the numbers may be filing references rather than foliation numbers.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

'Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874' [‎55v] (115/502), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F126/78, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100023442806.0x000074> [accessed 4 July 2026]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023442806.0x000074">'Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874' [&lrm;55v] (115/502)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023442806.0x000074">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001524.0x000381/Mss Eur F126_78_0115.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001524.0x000381/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image