'Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874' [81r] (166/502)
The record is made up of 1 volume (249 folios). It was created in 1 Nov 1873-14 Feb 1874. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
<1
3
/.<-J
Complainant is married to one of the daughters of Kisandas, and claims
on behalf of the above, and of his son Apaji, the issue of the said marriage, the
restoration of Kisandas' estate alleged to be of the value of five
lakhs
One lakh is equal to one hundred thousand rupees
of
rupees
Indian silver coin also widely used in the Persian Gulf.
,
which he states has been adjudged, as heirless property, to one Lalu Tulsi, on his
paying a Nazarana of Rs. 40,000 to the
Durbar
A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family).
.
This is clearly not a case that could be possibly investigated to any advan
tage by the Commission, or with which it is called on to deal, and it therefore
declines to take it up.
X.— Case No. 63.
Complaint of one Dinsha Darasha, Parsee of Surat, on behalf of the heirs of
Manekbai, daughter of Mancharji Gadiali.
The grievance in this case consists of the attachment of private property
consisting of land of the annual value of Rs. 6,000, in the Naosari Pargana,
belonging to the said Manekbai, which was attached in 1860 and finally confis
cated under the orders of the late Graekwar Khanderao, in 1869, on the ground
that the last legal holder of the same had left no heirs. Complainant claims the
restoration of the said property to the heirs of the said Manekbai.
This is also clearly a case which the Commission could not with propriety
investigate, and it therefore declines to take it up.
XI.— Case No.6
Complaint of Sukha Vahala of Nuldra in Naosari.
The claim in this case is in connection with the attachment of the village of -
Nuldra in Naosari by the Gaekwar's Government, in satisfaction of a demand
by the
Durbar
A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family).
against a third party, for whose non-payment of the same, com
plainant states he is in no way answerable or responsible.
The complainant in this instance is a subject of the Graekwar ^ his village
is in Baroda territory ; its attachment has been ordered in connection with a
security bond, admitted by complainant to have been executed by him in 1867,
engaging to make good to the Government any sum that might on enquiiy be
found due by a certain defaulting Revenue farmer, and there is nothing what
ever in the circumstances of the case, as set forth in the Schedule, that appeal s
to call for, or indeed to warrant, British interference.
The Commission, therefore, sees no ground for entering into the case, which
it would further be impossible for it to investigate to any good purpose.
XII—Case No.8
Complaint of Jetharam Ochharam of Patan on behalf of his brother Fatteh-
ram, late Foujdar of Patan.
The complaint has reference to the alleged payment of a sum of Ks. 7,000 by
the said Foujdar on his appointment, partly as a Nazarana to the Maharaja
himself, and partly as a bribe to the Minister and Sir Foujdar.
The person in whose behalf the complaint is made, has been recently con
victed by the
Durbar
A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family).
of torturing certain people, and has been sentenced to
imprisonment.
The Commission, while prepared to hear any representation from the
Foujdar himself, deems it inadvisable to receive such complaints from a third party,
and as the Foujdar has made no complaint, it declines to enter into this case.
The Foujdar appears to have richly deserved the punishment to which he
has been sentenced.
About this item
- Content
Report of the Baroda Enquiry Commission on the administration of the government of Malharrao, Gaekwar of Baroda. The Commission comprised Richard John Meade (President), Edward William Ravenscroft, Mumtazul Dowlah Nawab An honorific title; an official acting as a provincial deputy ruler in South Asia; or a significant Muslim landowner in nineteenth century India. Faiz Ali Khan, Colonel Alfred Thomas Etheridge and Thomas Duncan Mackenzie (Secretary).
The report comprises a letter from the members of the Baroda Enquiry Commission to the Secretary to the Government of India, Foreign Department presenting their report on the results of the proceedings and submitting copies of correspondence, reports and statements relative to the enquiry (ff 5-19):
Appendix A, Part I
- Schedules I-III: Complaints and grievances against the Gaekwar's Government from individuals and groups (ff 21-78).
- Appendix B, Schedules I-III: Cases of complaint and grievance which the commission did not look into during the enquiry (ff 79-81).
- Appendix C: Letter from Colonel Richard John Meade, President, Special Commission of Enquiry on Baroda Affairs, to Colonel Robert Phayre, Resident at Baroda, 1 November 1873 (ff 82-83).
- Appendix D: Translation of an amended notice issued by the Resident to complainants desirous of appearing before the Baroda Enquiry Commission (ff 84-85).
- Appendix E: Schedules presented to the Commission along with Colonel Phayre's introductory statement regarding them. (ff 86-131).
- Appendix F: Letter No. 1128 of 1873 from Colonel Phayre to the President, Baroda Commission regarding the cases already submitted to the Commission, the List of undisposed petitions to be attended to by the Resident which could be used as additional cases if required and the statements that he had yet to make on cases under enquiry by the Commission (ff 132-133).
- Appendix G, Schedule I: Statements from witnesses with cross examination statements from the Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). on behalf of the Gaekwar and statements from the Resident as to the accuracy of the information provided (ff 134-229).
Appendix Part II (ff 231-245)
- Letter from James Braithwaite Peile, Acting Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. , Kattywar [Kathiawar] to T D Mackenzie, Secretary, Baroda Commission, 13 December 1873 regarding papers requested by the Commission and informing them that the outstanding paper will be forwarded as soon as they are received. Enclosed with the letter are a memorandum from Peile for reconstitution of His Highness the Gaekwar's Contingent in Kattywar, 13 December 1873 and Rule for the guidance of the Officers and Kamdars appointed to the Contingent of Horse of His Highness the Gaekwar, serving in the various Tributary Mahals according to treaty.
- Letter from Peile to Mackenzie, 6 January 1874, forwarding a report and returns received from Colonel Walker, Superintendent to the Gaekwar's Contingent in Kattywar and stating that he does not concur with the Colonel's opinion. Enclosed with this letter is a letter from Colonel Chamberlen William Walker, 30 December 1873, providing the information on the Contingent requested by the Commission and enclosing an extract of the Contingents annual report for 1871 and a statement of the men within the Contingent on duty under officials paid by Talukdars etc, 06 March 1872.
- Letters from John Whaley Watson, Acting Political Superintendent Pahlanpur [Palanpur], Captain Henry Nicholas Reeves, Acting Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. Rewa Kanta [Rewa Kantha] and Major Philip Harrison Le Geyt, Acting Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. , Mahi Kanta [Mahi Kantha] to the secretary of the Baroda Commission 19 December 1873 to 9 January 1874 reporting on the Gaekwar's contingents serving within their districts and commenting on numbers of men, pay and conditions. The letters all refer to enclosed returns, but only the return for Mahi Kanta is included in the report.
- Extent and format
- 1 volume (249 folios)
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the main sequence of foliation consists of a small pencil number in the top front right hand corner of each folio enclosed in a circle.
There is also an original sequence of foliation which consists of larger pencil numbers also in the top front right hand corner of folios, however the sequence is not consistent and some of the numbers may be filing references rather than foliation numbers.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
'Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874' [81r] (166/502), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F126/78, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100023442806.0x0000a7> [accessed 24 July 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023442806.0x0000a7
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023442806.0x0000a7">'Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874' [‎81r] (166/502)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023442806.0x0000a7"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001524.0x000381/Mss Eur F126_78_0166.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001524.0x000381/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- Mss Eur F126/78
- Title
- 'Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874'
- Pages
- front, back, spine, edge, head, tail, front-i, 2r:248v, back-i
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
!['Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874' [‎81r] (166/502) 'Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874' [‎81r] (166/502)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001524.0x000381/Mss Eur F126_78_0166.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)