'Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874' [118v] (241/502)
The record is made up of 1 volume (249 folios). It was created in 1 Nov 1873-14 Feb 1874. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
64
SCHEDULE No.
j &C.
General circumstances of eacH case.
Rs. 2,71,799.
mess' Jamdar Kbana.
Bank.
I brought a great many other articles of jewelry, but the above
were approved. Soon after my arrival, Amichund's son, Futte^
chund, accompanied me to the palace, where we received
orders to go to the Nuggur Paga, where the Ranee Saheb was
at that time. We then gave the jewellery specified to
Seetaram, the Karkoon of the Mahrajah s Jamdar Khana, for the
purpose of being valued, approved, &c. Seetaram entered the
articles thus obtained in a book, and Futtechund and I return
ed home. During about a month I kept going to Seetaram to
ask him if the jewels were purchased. At last Futtechund and
I and plenty of others jewellers were called to the Havelee to
the Mahrajah; Hurriba Gaekwar, Bulwantrao Deo, Bulwantrao
Yeshwunt, &c., were there. We received orders to go the
Jamdar Khana, and Hurriba Gaekwar and the other jewellers
went with us. There the whole of the jewellery was shown.
I stated the value of my jewellery to be about S'or 3J
lacs
One lakh is equal to one hundred thousand rupees
.
On this Hurriba Gaekwar and Seetaram showed my jewelry
to the other jewellers, and they estimated the value at about
lacs
One lakh is equal to one hundred thousand rupees
to 2,60,000. After this Bhaichund Wudman was
called in by Hurriba Gaekwar, and after consulting him offered
Rs. 2,71,799-8-6. I then urged for Rs. 4 or 5,000 in addition,
but they refused. Then the jewellers and others there advised
me to take this amount. I accordingly told Seetaram and Huriba
Gaekwar that I accepted it. They then credited the above
amount to my name in the accounts of the J amdar Khana, and
told me to go home and that they would inform the Maharajah,
and obtain the Furnees chit for payment and the signature of the
Maharajah. A few days after the chits were made out and signed
by the Maharajah and I produce copies of them. One is on Ma-
niklal Kooslal of Ahmedabad (having a shop at Baroda), for Rs.
25,000: one on Chotilal Maniklal of Sinnur, who has a shop
at Baroda, for Rs. 2,00,804-10-6 ; another on Gopalrao Myral ;
for Rs. 45,994-14-0. This was after the marriage, and at this
time three months had passed. I went to Seetaram* to ask
for my chits. Seetaram told me to go to Wussuntram Bhowf
as he was in authority. I did so, and Wussuntram Bhow told
me that I could not receive the full amount demanded but that
I must take something less. I said either give me back my
jewels or pay me the full amount, as I could not take less
than the amount settled, such not being the custom, and that
I could not argue the point with the Sirkar. Wussuntram
Bhow told me that the jewels had been worn at the Ranee s
marriage at a propitious time, and that it was not possible to
return them, neither could the amount fixed be given for them.
I was then advised not to have any further altercation ^witn
Wussantram Bhow about the matter, and I returned to
Ahmedabad. I have received information that Wussuntram
Bhow cashed His Highness' orders and placed the money m
the Government Bank under his superintendence, and the
money has been carrying interest since that time. Aboutfouror
five months after this, my uncle wrote to the Maharajah on t e
subject, but no reply was received. He after this wrote once or
twice again. At last he sent a registered letter, as per receip
attached, dated the 16th of September 1872. I produce a copy
of this letter. No reply was received to this letter, and my
uncle again addressed a registered letter to His Highi^ &s
in March 1873. I produce the register receipt and a cop} 0
the letter addressed to His Highness. We waited for three
months, but having received no reply, my uncle addressed a t i r
registered letter to His Highness on 1st July 1873, as per receip^
attached of that date. No reply was received to that a1is ^'i e
came here by my uncle's order on 22nd December 1873, anat
About this item
- Content
Report of the Baroda Enquiry Commission on the administration of the government of Malharrao, Gaekwar of Baroda. The Commission comprised Richard John Meade (President), Edward William Ravenscroft, Mumtazul Dowlah Nawab An honorific title; an official acting as a provincial deputy ruler in South Asia; or a significant Muslim landowner in nineteenth century India. Faiz Ali Khan, Colonel Alfred Thomas Etheridge and Thomas Duncan Mackenzie (Secretary).
The report comprises a letter from the members of the Baroda Enquiry Commission to the Secretary to the Government of India, Foreign Department presenting their report on the results of the proceedings and submitting copies of correspondence, reports and statements relative to the enquiry (ff 5-19):
Appendix A, Part I
- Schedules I-III: Complaints and grievances against the Gaekwar's Government from individuals and groups (ff 21-78).
- Appendix B, Schedules I-III: Cases of complaint and grievance which the commission did not look into during the enquiry (ff 79-81).
- Appendix C: Letter from Colonel Richard John Meade, President, Special Commission of Enquiry on Baroda Affairs, to Colonel Robert Phayre, Resident at Baroda, 1 November 1873 (ff 82-83).
- Appendix D: Translation of an amended notice issued by the Resident to complainants desirous of appearing before the Baroda Enquiry Commission (ff 84-85).
- Appendix E: Schedules presented to the Commission along with Colonel Phayre's introductory statement regarding them. (ff 86-131).
- Appendix F: Letter No. 1128 of 1873 from Colonel Phayre to the President, Baroda Commission regarding the cases already submitted to the Commission, the List of undisposed petitions to be attended to by the Resident which could be used as additional cases if required and the statements that he had yet to make on cases under enquiry by the Commission (ff 132-133).
- Appendix G, Schedule I: Statements from witnesses with cross examination statements from the Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). on behalf of the Gaekwar and statements from the Resident as to the accuracy of the information provided (ff 134-229).
Appendix Part II (ff 231-245)
- Letter from James Braithwaite Peile, Acting Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. , Kattywar [Kathiawar] to T D Mackenzie, Secretary, Baroda Commission, 13 December 1873 regarding papers requested by the Commission and informing them that the outstanding paper will be forwarded as soon as they are received. Enclosed with the letter are a memorandum from Peile for reconstitution of His Highness the Gaekwar's Contingent in Kattywar, 13 December 1873 and Rule for the guidance of the Officers and Kamdars appointed to the Contingent of Horse of His Highness the Gaekwar, serving in the various Tributary Mahals according to treaty.
- Letter from Peile to Mackenzie, 6 January 1874, forwarding a report and returns received from Colonel Walker, Superintendent to the Gaekwar's Contingent in Kattywar and stating that he does not concur with the Colonel's opinion. Enclosed with this letter is a letter from Colonel Chamberlen William Walker, 30 December 1873, providing the information on the Contingent requested by the Commission and enclosing an extract of the Contingents annual report for 1871 and a statement of the men within the Contingent on duty under officials paid by Talukdars etc, 06 March 1872.
- Letters from John Whaley Watson, Acting Political Superintendent Pahlanpur [Palanpur], Captain Henry Nicholas Reeves, Acting Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. Rewa Kanta [Rewa Kantha] and Major Philip Harrison Le Geyt, Acting Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. , Mahi Kanta [Mahi Kantha] to the secretary of the Baroda Commission 19 December 1873 to 9 January 1874 reporting on the Gaekwar's contingents serving within their districts and commenting on numbers of men, pay and conditions. The letters all refer to enclosed returns, but only the return for Mahi Kanta is included in the report.
- Extent and format
- 1 volume (249 folios)
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the main sequence of foliation consists of a small pencil number in the top front right hand corner of each folio enclosed in a circle.
There is also an original sequence of foliation which consists of larger pencil numbers also in the top front right hand corner of folios, however the sequence is not consistent and some of the numbers may be filing references rather than foliation numbers.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
'Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874' [118v] (241/502), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F126/78, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100023442807.0x00002a> [accessed 18 July 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023442807.0x00002a
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023442807.0x00002a">'Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874' [‎118v] (241/502)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023442807.0x00002a"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001524.0x000381/Mss Eur F126_78_0241.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001524.0x000381/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- Mss Eur F126/78
- Title
- 'Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874'
- Pages
- front, back, spine, edge, head, tail, front-i, 2r:248v, back-i
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
!['Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874' [‎118v] (241/502) 'Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874' [‎118v] (241/502)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001524.0x000381/Mss Eur F126_78_0241.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)