Skip to item: of 502
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

'Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874' [‎130r] (264/502)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 volume (249 folios). It was created in 1 Nov 1873-14 Feb 1874. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

87
SCHEDULE No. III. — continue
'tack
No.
Names of Claimants^ &c.
* ^VOUjU
5Ult 1
jahrepitt;
wl bees pi;
hat tiek
ontotkl
sretmeh
ainloflii
mrel li
Resident!
toliklki
quested k
.f' 14
v iktofe
SirSA
promiaf 1
isli mjfc
aoDeo,®
the ® :
juiSWsii-
ourtoffe
ktotinq
;t«niej
;tead 8i '
■his
retortf;
j '
Jlk^
at«
ft
'"of tit"
>5
^ J
Note.—It is quite true that the Vakeel
was imprisoned on account of his hav
ing come to the Residency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, established in the provinces and regions considered part of, or under the influence of, British India. to represent
his case, and he was only released on
the Resident's demand.
Present state of the relations of the Gaek-
war with the British Government and
the neighbouring States of the Rewa
Karta ; Mahi Kanta, Pahlunpur,&c. ; &c.
General circumstances of each case.
the Resident. I answered in the affirmative ; on this I was
sent in charge of a Karkoon, Kesharao Manick^, and a police
peon A low-ranking infantryman, orderly or assistant (South Asian context). to Balwuntrao Deo^ and Narayenbhai who asked me
whether I petitioned the Resident. I answered that I had.
They then asked me whether I had referred to a khurita of
Gunputrao Maharajah in which he had promised to turn out
all his servants who had been discharged by the British Go
vernment for misconduct. I said, that I had referred to that
khurita on which Balwuntrao Deo told me that I was liable
to ten years' rigorous imprisonment, and ordered me to be taken
away and imprisoned in a cell in the Fouzdar^s Kutcherry.
Two KarkooDS and six police peons were then sent with me
to my house^ and they seized all my papers and took them to
the Fouzdar, and I was sent back to prison. I remained there
for fifteen days, and was only released on a demand from the
Resident to know why I was imprisoned. I was then dis
charged. My duftur was then returned tome and 1 passed a
receipt for the same. I found on subsequent examination
that copies of three petitions that I made to the Resident and
some letters that I received from my employers and friends in
Kattiawar are missing. I then obtained permission from the
Resident to reside in camp and have been here ever since.
On the 20th of August I represented the whole of my clients'
case to the Resident and solicited his interference in the
matter, because, as shown above, I could not obtain redress
from the Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). . 1 have not received any reply as yet to
that petition.
It would take more time than can at present be spared to sub
mit to the Commission in detail the questions of guaranteed
and other Girasias, Wanta-holders, land and boundary dis
putes, cases of extradition and jurisdiction, failure to give
effect to Government decisions, transit dues^ customs, chow-
kees, &c., &c., which are at present pending between the
Resident and the Gaekwar Government.
It will be sufficient to state in general terms with regard to
them, that there are about 250 giras cases to be settled,
besides nearly the same number of other references on different
subjects ; and it is quite clear that unless a very different
mode of conducting business, than that now followed by the
Gaekwar Government is adopted^ the just and equitable
settlement of these vexed questions appears to be hopeless ;
consequently that persons entitled to our protection must
continue to suffer great loss.
Within the last day or two I have found the following valu
able evidence in my office upon the present state of our busi
ness intercourse with the Baroda Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). . It is continued in
the last Administration Report of the Rewa Kanta for 1872-73,
and represents the opinions of Lieut.-Gol. Barton, the Politi
cal Agent of the Rewa Kanta, an officer of upwards of twenty
years' experience in Baroda itself—part of that period having
passed as Assistant Resident—and of Captain Reeves^ the
acting Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. who drew up the report in question.
In para. 252 of the report. Captain Reeves says " The rela-
" tion of this Agency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, headed by an agent. with the Gaekwar could not well be in a
more unsatisfactory state. I will quote what Colonel Bar-
ton has said on this subject in a letter now before Govern-
" ment (viz., 17th October 1872)"—
i
I

About this item

Content

Report of the Baroda Enquiry Commission on the administration of the government of Malharrao, Gaekwar of Baroda. The Commission comprised Richard John Meade (President), Edward William Ravenscroft, Mumtazul Dowlah Nawab An honorific title; an official acting as a provincial deputy ruler in South Asia; or a significant Muslim landowner in nineteenth century India. Faiz Ali Khan, Colonel Alfred Thomas Etheridge and Thomas Duncan Mackenzie (Secretary).

The report comprises a letter from the members of the Baroda Enquiry Commission to the Secretary to the Government of India, Foreign Department presenting their report on the results of the proceedings and submitting copies of correspondence, reports and statements relative to the enquiry (ff 5-19):

Appendix A, Part I

  • Schedules I-III: Complaints and grievances against the Gaekwar's Government from individuals and groups (ff 21-78).
  • Appendix B, Schedules I-III: Cases of complaint and grievance which the commission did not look into during the enquiry (ff 79-81).
  • Appendix C: Letter from Colonel Richard John Meade, President, Special Commission of Enquiry on Baroda Affairs, to Colonel Robert Phayre, Resident at Baroda, 1 November 1873 (ff 82-83).
  • Appendix D: Translation of an amended notice issued by the Resident to complainants desirous of appearing before the Baroda Enquiry Commission (ff 84-85).
  • Appendix E: Schedules presented to the Commission along with Colonel Phayre's introductory statement regarding them. (ff 86-131).
  • Appendix F: Letter No. 1128 of 1873 from Colonel Phayre to the President, Baroda Commission regarding the cases already submitted to the Commission, the List of undisposed petitions to be attended to by the Resident which could be used as additional cases if required and the statements that he had yet to make on cases under enquiry by the Commission (ff 132-133).
  • Appendix G, Schedule I: Statements from witnesses with cross examination statements from the Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). on behalf of the Gaekwar and statements from the Resident as to the accuracy of the information provided (ff 134-229).

Appendix Part II (ff 231-245)

Extent and format
1 volume (249 folios)
Physical characteristics

Foliation: the main sequence of foliation consists of a small pencil number in the top front right hand corner of each folio enclosed in a circle.

There is also an original sequence of foliation which consists of larger pencil numbers also in the top front right hand corner of folios, however the sequence is not consistent and some of the numbers may be filing references rather than foliation numbers.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

'Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874' [‎130r] (264/502), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F126/78, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100023442807.0x000041> [accessed 7 July 2026]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023442807.0x000041">'Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874' [&lrm;130r] (264/502)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023442807.0x000041">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001524.0x000381/Mss Eur F126_78_0264.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001524.0x000381/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image