'Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874' [203r] (410/502)
The record is made up of 1 volume (249 folios). It was created in 1 Nov 1873-14 Feb 1874. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
J
■
SCHEDULE II.
C ase N o . 49.
Krishnaji Govindrao Jadav, 60 years, of Baroda, states:—I have been a
personal attendant of the Gaek war's since the time of the death ofSeiaji
Maharaj. I was Jemadar of the Chatriwalas at the time of Khanderao's
death. I had at that time property worth Rs. 72,000 and houses worth
something. I have no idea how much. About 6 weeks after Khanderao's
death I was arrested one night and taken to the Fattehpur Chabutra, and
next morning I was hand-cuffed and taken to the jail. I was told by the
Khamdar (Bhujangrao) of the Foujdar that I was sentenced to 3 years' im
prisonment on suspicion. I was not told the nature of the suspicion against
me. I was confined in a solitary cell for 6 months. I was then for 4 months
with the other prisoners, till one day the Maharaj cominground to see the jail
observed me, and directed that one Eshvantrao, and one Chimanrao, should,
as well as I, be confined in three separate cells. His order was obeyed, and
1 remained in this rigorous custody for 1 year and 10 months. I was released
about months ago on the petition of my daughter to the Resident about me.
On release I went home and stayed 15 days, when I was expelled summarily
by the Government officials, and have since lived in the camp. All that
remains to me and my family is the clothes we stand in. The Gaekwar's
people have given an Inam to my servant Lakshman, who showed them where
all my property was concealed.
The
Durbar
A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family).
Agents defer cross-examination and their statement.
Reply of the
Durbar
A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family).
.
He was concerned in the attempt to burn down the Palace, and was after
trial convicted and sentenced to 3 years' imprisonment. His property worth
Rs. 2,000, not Rs, 72,000 as stated, was confiscated.
Final Statement of the Resident.
It must be assumed that the conviction and sentence of the petitioner
Krishnaji Govindrao took place according to some recognized form of judicial
procedure. Nothing could have been simpler than to produce the proceedings,
or to have questioned the petitioner regarding the charge on which he is said to
have been found guilty. The omission to produce any proceedings, or to ask a
single question in cross-examination, tends to corroborate the petitioner's
statement that he was thrown into prison without any legal formalities at all.
The statement of the
Durbar
A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family).
regarding the value of the petitioner's property
is unsupported by evidence, and is entitled to no consideration. It is to be
observed that no reason is assigned for the confiscation of the petitioner's
property at all. If the confiscation was inflicted as part of legal sentence,
there appears to be no reason for assigning a nominal value to a property
which the petitioner himself has valued at Rs. 72,000.
It appears clear that the petitioner has been thrown into prison on a
nominal charge, and has been detained there several years pending the
Maharaja's pleasure, the whole of the petitioner's very considerable property
having been confiscated, and his family having been reduced to destitution.
Under these circumstances, it is hoped that the Commission will be able to make
some recommendation to Government, which will have the effect of relieving
the petitioner from the pressure of absolute want.
ii—49
About this item
- Content
Report of the Baroda Enquiry Commission on the administration of the government of Malharrao, Gaekwar of Baroda. The Commission comprised Richard John Meade (President), Edward William Ravenscroft, Mumtazul Dowlah Nawab An honorific title; an official acting as a provincial deputy ruler in South Asia; or a significant Muslim landowner in nineteenth century India. Faiz Ali Khan, Colonel Alfred Thomas Etheridge and Thomas Duncan Mackenzie (Secretary).
The report comprises a letter from the members of the Baroda Enquiry Commission to the Secretary to the Government of India, Foreign Department presenting their report on the results of the proceedings and submitting copies of correspondence, reports and statements relative to the enquiry (ff 5-19):
Appendix A, Part I
- Schedules I-III: Complaints and grievances against the Gaekwar's Government from individuals and groups (ff 21-78).
- Appendix B, Schedules I-III: Cases of complaint and grievance which the commission did not look into during the enquiry (ff 79-81).
- Appendix C: Letter from Colonel Richard John Meade, President, Special Commission of Enquiry on Baroda Affairs, to Colonel Robert Phayre, Resident at Baroda, 1 November 1873 (ff 82-83).
- Appendix D: Translation of an amended notice issued by the Resident to complainants desirous of appearing before the Baroda Enquiry Commission (ff 84-85).
- Appendix E: Schedules presented to the Commission along with Colonel Phayre's introductory statement regarding them. (ff 86-131).
- Appendix F: Letter No. 1128 of 1873 from Colonel Phayre to the President, Baroda Commission regarding the cases already submitted to the Commission, the List of undisposed petitions to be attended to by the Resident which could be used as additional cases if required and the statements that he had yet to make on cases under enquiry by the Commission (ff 132-133).
- Appendix G, Schedule I: Statements from witnesses with cross examination statements from the Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). on behalf of the Gaekwar and statements from the Resident as to the accuracy of the information provided (ff 134-229).
Appendix Part II (ff 231-245)
- Letter from James Braithwaite Peile, Acting Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. , Kattywar [Kathiawar] to T D Mackenzie, Secretary, Baroda Commission, 13 December 1873 regarding papers requested by the Commission and informing them that the outstanding paper will be forwarded as soon as they are received. Enclosed with the letter are a memorandum from Peile for reconstitution of His Highness the Gaekwar's Contingent in Kattywar, 13 December 1873 and Rule for the guidance of the Officers and Kamdars appointed to the Contingent of Horse of His Highness the Gaekwar, serving in the various Tributary Mahals according to treaty.
- Letter from Peile to Mackenzie, 6 January 1874, forwarding a report and returns received from Colonel Walker, Superintendent to the Gaekwar's Contingent in Kattywar and stating that he does not concur with the Colonel's opinion. Enclosed with this letter is a letter from Colonel Chamberlen William Walker, 30 December 1873, providing the information on the Contingent requested by the Commission and enclosing an extract of the Contingents annual report for 1871 and a statement of the men within the Contingent on duty under officials paid by Talukdars etc, 06 March 1872.
- Letters from John Whaley Watson, Acting Political Superintendent Pahlanpur [Palanpur], Captain Henry Nicholas Reeves, Acting Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. Rewa Kanta [Rewa Kantha] and Major Philip Harrison Le Geyt, Acting Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. , Mahi Kanta [Mahi Kantha] to the secretary of the Baroda Commission 19 December 1873 to 9 January 1874 reporting on the Gaekwar's contingents serving within their districts and commenting on numbers of men, pay and conditions. The letters all refer to enclosed returns, but only the return for Mahi Kanta is included in the report.
- Extent and format
- 1 volume (249 folios)
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the main sequence of foliation consists of a small pencil number in the top front right hand corner of each folio enclosed in a circle.
There is also an original sequence of foliation which consists of larger pencil numbers also in the top front right hand corner of folios, however the sequence is not consistent and some of the numbers may be filing references rather than foliation numbers.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
'Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874' [203r] (410/502), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F126/78, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100023442808.0x00000b> [accessed 12 July 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023442808.0x00000b
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023442808.0x00000b">'Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874' [‎203r] (410/502)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023442808.0x00000b"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001524.0x000381/Mss Eur F126_78_0410.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001524.0x000381/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- Mss Eur F126/78
- Title
- 'Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874'
- Pages
- front, back, spine, edge, head, tail, front-i, 2r:248v, back-i
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
!['Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874' [‎203r] (410/502) 'Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874' [‎203r] (410/502)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001524.0x000381/Mss Eur F126_78_0410.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)