Skip to item: of 502
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

'Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874' [‎204v] (413/502)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 volume (249 folios). It was created in 1 Nov 1873-14 Feb 1874. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

Final Statement by the Resident.
With reference to the explanation of the Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). in the case of Masukh
Narsidas, it must be pointed out that not a single question was put to this
witness in cross-examination, and that the allegations of the Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). are un
supported by any kind of evidence, which could easily have been produced
from their own records, had such evidence existed.
It must be presumed that Masukh Narsidas was legally tried and con
victed by a competent Court, and nothing could have been more simple than
to produce the proceedings. The omission to do so tends to corroborate the
petitioner's statement that he was thrown into prison without any trial.
If the chief offence for which the petitioner was convicted was a conspi
racy against the Assistant Resident, it is most extraordinary that no allusion
to the case can be found on the Residency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, established in the provinces and regions considered part of, or under the influence of, British India. records. The fact indeed is so
extraordinary as to make the Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). 's statement on this point unworthy of
serious consideration.
The statement of the Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). that Masukh Narsidas himself made correc
tions in his own depositions and initialled them, might easily have been cor
roborated by producing the depositions and questioning the witness as to his
own entries. The omission to do so cannot fail to prejudice the statement
made.
The Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). admit that the petitioner's property has been attached, but
deny that it has been confiscated. It is significant that no explanation of
the attachment has been affordedthough the attachment in question has been
in force for the last three years. The petitioner swears that he has twice
formally requested the Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). to be placed in possession of his property, and
that his request has been distinctly refused. It is inconceivable that the
petitioner would not have taken his property if he had had the chance, and
the Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). 's present offer to the petitioner to receive his property " if he will
come and take it," is under the circumstances rather significant.
The nature of the security bond exacted from the petitioner might easily
have been demonstrated by its production. The omission to do so tends to
corroborate the petitioner's statement.
The explanation of the Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). of the treatment of the petitioner's wife
is scarcely satisfactory. The petitioner has sworn that his wife was confined
in her house for 6 months to prevent her from leaving Baroda, and was only
released when the petitioner himself was thrown into Jail. The petitioner's
wife being dead, the falsity of the Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). 's explanation is saved from decisive
exposure. It is clear, however, that if the restoration of a paper be the only
excuse for detaining the petitioner's wife that object could have been
attained without confining her for six months.
It will be observed that no explanation whatever is given of the peti
tioner's most serious charge that he • himself was thrown into prison for 9
months without trial.
Under these circumstances, it seems clear that the petitioner has a legiti
mate grievance, and is justly entitled to damages in consideration of the
great loss and injury which he has sustained at the hands of Balvantrao
Eshwant, the Sir Foujdar, and other Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). officials.

About this item

Content

Report of the Baroda Enquiry Commission on the administration of the government of Malharrao, Gaekwar of Baroda. The Commission comprised Richard John Meade (President), Edward William Ravenscroft, Mumtazul Dowlah Nawab An honorific title; an official acting as a provincial deputy ruler in South Asia; or a significant Muslim landowner in nineteenth century India. Faiz Ali Khan, Colonel Alfred Thomas Etheridge and Thomas Duncan Mackenzie (Secretary).

The report comprises a letter from the members of the Baroda Enquiry Commission to the Secretary to the Government of India, Foreign Department presenting their report on the results of the proceedings and submitting copies of correspondence, reports and statements relative to the enquiry (ff 5-19):

Appendix A, Part I

  • Schedules I-III: Complaints and grievances against the Gaekwar's Government from individuals and groups (ff 21-78).
  • Appendix B, Schedules I-III: Cases of complaint and grievance which the commission did not look into during the enquiry (ff 79-81).
  • Appendix C: Letter from Colonel Richard John Meade, President, Special Commission of Enquiry on Baroda Affairs, to Colonel Robert Phayre, Resident at Baroda, 1 November 1873 (ff 82-83).
  • Appendix D: Translation of an amended notice issued by the Resident to complainants desirous of appearing before the Baroda Enquiry Commission (ff 84-85).
  • Appendix E: Schedules presented to the Commission along with Colonel Phayre's introductory statement regarding them. (ff 86-131).
  • Appendix F: Letter No. 1128 of 1873 from Colonel Phayre to the President, Baroda Commission regarding the cases already submitted to the Commission, the List of undisposed petitions to be attended to by the Resident which could be used as additional cases if required and the statements that he had yet to make on cases under enquiry by the Commission (ff 132-133).
  • Appendix G, Schedule I: Statements from witnesses with cross examination statements from the Durbar A public or private audience held by a high-ranking British colonial representative (e.g. Viceroy, Governor-General, or member of the British royal family). on behalf of the Gaekwar and statements from the Resident as to the accuracy of the information provided (ff 134-229).

Appendix Part II (ff 231-245)

Extent and format
1 volume (249 folios)
Physical characteristics

Foliation: the main sequence of foliation consists of a small pencil number in the top front right hand corner of each folio enclosed in a circle.

There is also an original sequence of foliation which consists of larger pencil numbers also in the top front right hand corner of folios, however the sequence is not consistent and some of the numbers may be filing references rather than foliation numbers.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

'Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874' [‎204v] (413/502), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F126/78, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100023442808.0x00000e> [accessed 2 July 2026]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023442808.0x00000e">'Baroda Enquiry Commission Report, 1874' [&lrm;204v] (413/502)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100023442808.0x00000e">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001524.0x000381/Mss Eur F126_78_0413.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001524.0x000381/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image