'Memorandum on the Indo-European Telegraph Department and Narrative of Events to the end of 1898' [4r] (7/20)
The record is made up of 1 file (10 folios). It was created in 24 Jul 1899. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
7
Secondly. Supposing that the Department could withdraw, would it he
advisable to do so ? It must be remembered that this Department is a
purely intermediate and transit Administration, depending for its traffic
entirely on the Indian Department (which must send all messages by the
route marked on the message) and the Indo-European Telegraph Company
or the Turkish Administration. The Indo-European Company is really a
Bussian Company, with the Bussian and German Directors-General of
Telegraphs as official members of its Board of Directors. Supposing
that this Department withdrew from the Purse and became a rival,
the Indo-European Company would be still bound by its Joint Purse
Arrangement entered into with the Eastern Telegraph Company ^ before
this Department joined them, and would allow traffic to be diverted to the
Eastern route. This would cause financial ruin to this Department by its
being starved out, and so long as the Turkish line from Eao to Constantinople
remains in its present inefficient condition there will always be the risk that
it may be secured by the Eastern Company, and the two Companies would then
completely control all the routes to India.
32. On the other hand, so long as this Department remains a partner with the
Companies we have an equal voice with them in the control of the telegraph
routes to India, and perhaps a greater power than if we were acting in
opposition.
33. Again, in the question of the reduction of rates to India, it is a well known
fact that the Indian traffic is a most inelastic one, and no reduction in
past years seems to have been responded to by an increase in traffic, in fact,
for the past few years, the tendency seems to be rather to decrease than
to increase.
34. As has been shown before, the practice has always been for the Com
panies and this Department to consult and agree beforehand on any alteration
of rates, and the Joint Purse Agreement simply ratified this practice. But,
supposing that this Department were free and were to wish to reduce its rate
in the
Persian Gulf
The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran.
, what would be the result ? The present rate between
Karachi and Bushire is Ecs. 1.455, so that if, as was suggested many
years ago, the Indian terminal rate were to include the transit over the lines
of this Department, the through rate would only be reduced to about two
shillings and eightpence a word, and if our rate were put down against the
Eastern Company, the Indo-European Company would be almost certain to
obtain permission to raise their rate in order to prevent a competitive rate,
which would be contrary to the Begulations of the International Convention.
The Government of India is therefore powerless, whether as a partner in the
Joint Purse or as an independent and rival line, to force the Companies to
reduce their rates so long as they are only an intermediate administration
and have only partial control over the through route.
35 . The position is no doubt unsatisfactory, and the difficulty is to see any
way in which reductions can be effected. So long as the interests of the Indo-
European Company were identical with our own, matters were much easier,
but this is no longer the case, and we cannot depend upon them for support.
There can be no doubt that, should the Company not succeed in getting an
extension of their Bussian Concession, and the line be taken over and
worked by the Bussian and German Governments, there would be a large
reduction and probably the working would be just as efficient. At present
the Bussian transit rate for messages with India is Ecs. 1.505, while the
transit rate for all other messages over the same lines (those destined for
Persia, for instance), is only Ees. 0.70, so that the rate is Ecs. 0.805 higher
for Indian messages than for any others, and this difference goes to make up
the revenues of the Indo-European Company. An extra charge is also levied
on all Indian messages passing over the Turkish lines, the transit rate for
Indian messages being Ecs. 1.195, and for all others Ees. 1.00. Again the
present rate via Turkey to the Indian frontier for messages terminating in
India is Ecs. 3.925, but on messages destined for places beyond India it is only
Ecs. 3.25. It seems very difficult at the present time to justify this difference
About this item
- Content
The memorandum concerns telegraphic communication between Britain and India, with a particular focus on the telegraph lines routed via the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. region, and therefore the Indo-European Telegraph Company. It was authored by Benjamin Traill Ffinch, Director-in-Chief of the Indo-European Telegraph Department; a department of the Government of India.
It outlines how the telegraph lines through the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. developed over time, and the concessions granted by various governments to permit their establishment. It also notes how charges have varied over time, and how various international telegraph conferences have affected them. It also explains the rise of competition — over traffic to India — between the Indo-European Telegraph and the Eastern Telegraph companies, and how this led to the signing of the Joint Purse Agreement between them. It also explains that the interests of the Indo-European Telegraph Company and the Indo-European Telegraph Department have diverged. It therefore claims that the prevailing circumstances make it very difficult for the Government of India to push down prices.
An appendices section is included with the following content:
- 'No. 1 Convention between Great Britain and Turkey for the establishment of Telegraphic communication between India and the Ottoman Territory'. 3 September 1864, ff 7-8;
- 'No. 2 Memorandum on Tariffs between Europe and India', f 8v;
- 'No. 3 Tariffs to India and beyond from 1863 to present time', f 9;
- 'No. 4 Statement showing Traffic Receipts of Departments from October 1864 to 31st March 1898', ff 9v-10.
- Extent and format
- 1 file (10 folios)
- Arrangement
The main body of the memorandum is located on folios 1 to 6, and the appendix follows on folios 7 to 10.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence commences at the first folio and terminates at the last folio; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
Pagination: the file also contains an original pagination sequence.
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
'Memorandum on the Indo-European Telegraph Department and Narrative of Events to the end of 1898' [4r] (7/20), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/18/D148, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100025538987.0x000008> [accessed 11 July 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100025538987.0x000008
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100025538987.0x000008">'Memorandum on the Indo-European Telegraph Department and Narrative of Events to the end of 1898' [‎4r] (7/20)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100025538987.0x000008"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000833.0x0002fb/IOR_L_PS_18_D148_0007.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000833.0x0002fb/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- IOR/L/PS/18/D148
- Title
- 'Memorandum on the Indo-European Telegraph Department and Narrative of Events to the end of 1898'
- Pages
- 1r:10v
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
!['Memorandum on the Indo-European Telegraph Department and Narrative of Events to the end of 1898' [‎4r] (7/20) 'Memorandum on the Indo-European Telegraph Department and Narrative of Events to the end of 1898' [‎4r] (7/20)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000833.0x0002fb/IOR_L_PS_18_D148_0007.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)