Skip to item: of 248
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

'Mesopotamia Commission. Report of the Commission Appointed by Act of Parliament to Enquire into the Operations of War in Mesopotamia, together with a Special Report by Commander J Wedgwood, DSO, MP, and Appendices. London: HMSO, 1917.' [‎53v] (106/248)

The record is made up of 1 volume (122 folios). It was created in 1906-1918. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

104 PART XI.—CAUSES CONTRIBUTING TO THE ERRORS OF JUDGMENT
AND SHORTCOMINGS OF RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIES.
D, Atmosphere of Economy up to Date of War and Effect upon Military
Preparations in India.
main it is the fact that both he and the Commander-in-Chief in their management of the
expedition entirely depended upon theL official information from that country. The
well-being and adequate maintenance of the expedition were therefore dependent on' the
requisitions and demands made on Simla by the General Officer Commanding and his
subordinates in Mesopotamia. It is therefore worth noting the environment, in which
for years previously military officials had worked and lived, and which represented the
fixed policy of the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. and Government up to the date of the sudden outbreak
of war.
35. It is a primary duty of every well-regulated Government to enforce effective
economy. In other words, to prevent waste and }^et ensure efficiency. Simple as is the
phraseology of this formula, it is in practice most difficult to enforce, and economists,
when in office, not unfrequently find themselves in defence of their principles obliged
to subordinate efficiency to economy by adopting the simple process of cutting down
aggregates of expenditure, or at any rate, of refusing an increase of existing outlay, no
matter what may be the urgency of the fresh demand.
A policy of strict economy had been insisted on alike by the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. and by
Simla for many years, and even as late as March, 1914, in a despatch to the Government of
India, the Secretary of State pointed out that the majority of the Army in India Committee
(a committee appointed to overhaul Indian military expenditure), had recommended
“ that the normal standard of net military expenditure should be retained at 19.5 millions
sterling, and that to the extent that reductions can be made in the figure by the economies
we have suggested, but not otherwise, our proposed measures for the improvement of
the Army should be taken in hand." The Secretary of State concluded his despatch
by placing an arbitrary limit on military expenditure as regards fresh demands in the
following words :—
I am anxious to receive from you a general assurance on similar lines as to the limits within which
military expenditure in the immediate future will be confined, and until you are in a position to give it I should
find it difficult to deal with any separate proposals that you might submit for carrying out measures involving
expense that have been recommended for adoption by the Committee.
36. Sir Douglas Haig, when Chief of the Staff, did put forward a memorandum in 1911
suggesting that the Indian Military establishments might have to furnish an expeditionary
force, armed and equipped to meet a European Army. In this paper he contemplated
; the possibility of a war with Turkey either alone or supported by Germany; but it was
| stated in evidence before us that this memorandum did not receive the approval of the
Viceroy, Lord Hardinge. It is a matter of common knowledge that after the Agadir
incident in 1911 there was such a possibility of war with Germany as to call for military
preparation and the consideration of plans of action. We know that such plans—and, to
some extent, preparation—were made in connection both with the Navy and Army at
home. But in India, until late in 1913 or early in 1914, no steps whatever seem to have been
taken to consider what help could be given in such contingencies by the Indian Army.
Still less were preparations made so to equip the Indian Army as to put it upon equal
conditions with modern European troops. The responsibility for this omission must rest
primarily with the Cabinet. Although the Indian Government is, to some extent, inde
pendent of the Cabinet, yet the Cabinet, through the Secretary of State for India, can
exercise control and authority over its actions, but the whole influence of the Home
Government was thrown in the direction of restriction rather than expansion of military
preparation in India.
So far as Mesopotamia was concerned, the consequences were unfortunate—there was
a lack of plans, and a lack of preparations.
Sir O’Moore Creagh was Commander-in-Chief for 4j years ending April, 1914. In
his evidence before us he stated that he was constantly calling attention to the deficiencies
of the Indian Army as regards modern equipment, especially in connection with machine
guns, heavy howitzers, signalling apparatus, wireless and air equipment, transport and
medical complements, and to the inadequate grants made for practice ammunition and the
insufficient sums voted for manceuvres. Sir O’Moore Creagh informed us that his repre
sentations had no result and were practically ignored and to such an extent was he generally
over-ridden by the Finance Department and the Viceroy that he determined to resign
office some six months before the usual tenure of his appointment terminated. But his

About this item

Content

A signed proof, folios 1-100, plus additional material, folios 101-124. The cover bears the signature of Sir Arthur Hirtzel, Assistant Under-Secretary of State. The report has been annotated in blue pencil at various points.

Contents:

  • 'Part I. Preface.
  • 'Part II. Origin of Mesopotamia [Iraq] Expedition.'
  • 'Part III. Advance from Basra to Kurna.'
  • 'Part IV. The Advance to Amara [Al-'Amārah] and Kut [Al-Kūt].'
  • 'Part V. Correspondence and Telegrams as to Advance on Baghdad.'
  • 'Part VI. The Advance from Kut to Ctesiphon.'
  • 'Part VII. Operations for Relief of Kut.'
  • 'Part VIII. Armament, Equipment, Reinforcements, &c.'
  • 'Part IX. Transport.'
  • 'Part X. Medical Breakdown.'
  • 'Part XI. Causes Contributing to the Errors of Judgement and Shortcomings of Responsible Authorities.'
  • 'Part XII. Findings and Conclusions. Recommendations.'
  • 'Separate Report by Commander J Wedgwood, DSO, MP.'
  • 'Appendix I. Vincent-Bingley Report.'
  • 'Appendix II. Memorandum by Sir Beauchamp Duff.'
  • 'Appendix III. Colonel Hehir's Account of the Siege of Kut-el-Amara.'

Additional material:

  • Folio 101. Manuscript note [by Arthur Hirtzel] on net military expenditure.
  • Folios 102-109. Copy of the East India (Army Administration), Further Papers regarding the Administration of the Army in India , 1906.
  • Folios 110-115. Manuscript notes, titled 'Suggested redraft & amplification of second half of parag 1' [unknown hand].
  • Folio 116. A clipping from the Daily Telegraph , Wednesday 4 July 1917, featuring an article titled 'Mesopotamia. Ex-Viceroy's Statement. The Medical Breakdown.'
  • Folios 117-124. An expanded typescript version of Hirtzel's manuscript notes (folio 101).
Extent and format
1 volume (122 folios)
Arrangement

A table of contents can be found at folio 4v.

An index can be found at folios 93-97.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the last folio with 124; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio. An additional foliation sequence is present in parallel between ff 110-115; these numbers are also written in pencil, but are not circled. Pagination: the file also contains an original printed pagination sequence. The volume comprises a stitched pamphlet, and other stitched and loose-leaf material.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

'Mesopotamia Commission. Report of the Commission Appointed by Act of Parliament to Enquire into the Operations of War in Mesopotamia, together with a Special Report by Commander J Wedgwood, DSO, MP, and Appendices. London: HMSO, 1917.' [‎53v] (106/248), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/20/257, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100036338403.0x00006b> [accessed 29 March 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100036338403.0x00006b">'Mesopotamia Commission. Report of the Commission Appointed by Act of Parliament to Enquire into the Operations of War in Mesopotamia, together with a Special Report by Commander J Wedgwood, DSO, MP, and Appendices. London: HMSO, 1917.' [&lrm;53v] (106/248)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100036338403.0x00006b">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000912.0x0000b2/IOR_L_PS_20_257_0106.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000912.0x0000b2/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image