Skip to item: of 330
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

File 4345/1912 'Trans-Persian Railway' [‎5r] (14/330)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 volume (163 folios). It was created in 1911-1913. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

[This Document is the Property of His Britannic Majesty’s Government.]
(0V
L ^
i) I
LB]
PERSIA.
CONFIDENTIAL.
[March 10.]
Section 1.
[10989] No - L
Sir G. Buchanan to Sir Edward Grey.—{Received March 10.)
St. Petershuryh, March 5, 1913.
IN the course of a conversation which I had with the Minister for Foreign Affairs
on the 1st of this month, I reverted to the question of the trans-Persian railway scheme,
and said that it appeared from figures with which you had supplied me that the
distance between Ispahan and Moscow was shorter by loO miles than that between
Ispahan and Constantinople. There could, therefore, be no danger of the through
European traffic being diverted to the Bagdad Railway, were our proposed alignment
to be carried out. The northern route via Russia would, I also pointed out, be
considerably shortened were goods for the European markets to be dispatched
westwards from Rostof instead of being carried so far north as Moscow.
His Excellency admitted the truth of the latter contention, hut said that though he
was not in a position to affirm straight oh that the figures which I had given him were
inaccurate, a study of the atlas had left on him an exactly contrary impiession. e
was still, he continued, of the opinion that the railway ought to be carried more to the
east and to pass by Yezd instead of Ispahan. I repeated what I had already said on a
former occasion, that this would not by itself prevent the Bagdad Railway being
eventually linked up with the trans-Persian railway. His Excellency would also no
doubt remember that we had always made our approval of the latter scheme subject to
certain conditions, of which the alignment was one, and that we had stated that the
railway must in any case enter the British sphere at Bunder Abbas. It was extremely
doubtful whether the through traffic from and to Europe would contribute to any
considerable extent to the success of the enterprise, and if British financiers were to be
induced to co-operate, it was necessary to choose an alignment which by reason ol local
conditions was likely to prove remunerative. The one which we had now proposed
offered substantial local advantages, which would more than compensate for the
increased length of the line, and I personally believed that it was the only practical one. |
Persia was a thinly populated country, and it was impossible to fix the trace of the
trans-Persian railway by drawing a straight line on the map from one town to another,
as the Emperor Nicholas I. had done in the case of the St. I etersburgh Moscow
Railway. On M. Sazonof remarking that in spite of this mode of procedure the latter
railway was a most paying concern, 1 said that the conditions were entirely different,
as in Russia the demand for railway accommodation was greater than the supply. As
his Excellency still seemed inclined to insist on the advantages of keeping tne
alignment at as great a distance as possible from the Bagdad Railway, I endeavoured
to impress on him, as instructed by your telegram No. 17,. of the dbth ultimo that the
best way to avoid an extension of the German railway system into 1 ersia was foi Gieat
Britain and Russia to carry out with the least possible delay some well considered
scheme of railway construction in that country. The one which you had now suggested
seemed to me admirably suited for the purpose, and I therefore trusted that it would
meet with his approval. His Excellency did not take exception to what 1 had said, but
remarked that it might perhaps be well for us also to take in hand the construction of
a line from Ispahan to Khorremabad. In the course of our subsequent conversation
he even went so far as to say that perhaps the best plan would be for us to drop the
larger scheme altogether and for Russia to construct a line to Tehran, while we might
build some railway in the south. As I thought that this remark might have een
prompted by a desire to.prevent our seaborne goods being carried northwaids o
Ispahan and Tehran, I observed that the Persian Government was not likely to grant a
concession for a line to Tehran except as part of a trunk line running down to the
If
In a conversation which I had with M. Sazonof yesterday I communicated to him
the information contained in your telegram No. 176 of the 1st instant respecting the
[2836 fc—1]
r““
cot
i
SE
12

About this item

Content

This volume comprises telegrams, despatches, correspondence, memoranda, notes, printed reports, a press cutting and a map, relating to the connection of the railway system of Europe to the railway system of India by the construction of railway lines through Persia.

The discussion in the volume relates to the proposal of a Russian consortium and the response of the Government of India to this proposal. A Report (No. 18 of 1911' folios 144 - 160) notes that the Government of India would do well to accept in principle the Russian proposal subject to a number of modifications. A map entitled 'Indexed Map Showing Proposed Railways in Persia' (folio 160) accompanies the report. Suggested modifications included:

  • the point of intersection of the trans-Persian railway with the Indian railway system (British preference for Karachi); and concessions for branch lines (Bandar Abbas, Charbar, Mohammerah);
  • the requirement that both main and branch lines in Persian territory be deemed international with Russia and Britain holding preponderant shares and Persia included as a participant;
  • and the use of a different gauge railway in the British and Russian zones. As a quid pro quo for their support on this matter Britain expected the Russians to cease any consideration of extending the Trans-Caspian Railway to the Persia-Afghan border.

Also discussed are the negotiations about a loan between the Société des Études du Chemin de Fer Transpersan and the Persian Government and a suggestion that the British and French governments should guarantee a substantial loan by securing it against the crown jewels.

The following topics are also discussed: the Foreign Office proposal to refer the whole question of railway development in Persia to the Committee of Imperial Defence; a draft application for the concession; a memorandum by Brigadier General A H Gordon; dispatch of instructions to His Majesty's Ambassador at St Petersberg on the attitude of the Her Majesty's Government; the view of the Sir G Buchanan on the attitude of the Russian Government to the question of alignment.

The principal correspondents in the volume include: His Majesty's Secretary of State for India, the Earl of Crewe; Deputy Secretary to the Government of India, E H S Clark; His Majesty's Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Sir Edward Grey; the Political Resident A senior ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul General) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Residency. in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. , Lieutenant-Colonel Percy Zachariah Cox; the President of the Railway Board; Agent to the Governor-General and Chief Commissioner in Baluchistan.

This volume includes a divider which gives the subject and part numbers, year the subject file was opened, subject heading, and list of correspondence references contained in that part by year. This is placed at the back of the correspondence.

Extent and format
1 volume (163 folios)
Arrangement

The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the volume. The subject 4345 (Trans-Persian Railway) consists of 1 volume.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence commences at the inside front cover with 1, and terminates at the inside back cover with 163; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

File 4345/1912 'Trans-Persian Railway' [‎5r] (14/330), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/307, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100036625670.0x00000f> [accessed 28 March 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100036625670.0x00000f">File 4345/1912 'Trans-Persian Railway' [&lrm;5r] (14/330)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100036625670.0x00000f">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0000c7/IOR_L_PS_10_307_0014.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000419.0x0000c7/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image