'Additions and Corrections to Who's Who in Persia (Volume IV)' [‎87r] (180/312)

87
to sport. Took lessons in English from Sufi Amba.
Prashad, the Indian seditionist harboured in Shiraz by
anti-British persons. In November 1915, when the
rebel Gendarmerie officers and Germans took possession
of Shiraz, and bombarded the Qawami quarters he fled
with his father to Eastern Ears. On the return of his
father in February 1916 from Bushire, where he had
been to obtain assistance in war material from Sir P.
Cox and on the sudden death of his father from a fail
from his horse in the Khafr district during their march
on Shiraz, Mirza Ibrahim Khan succeeded as Qawam-
ul-Mulk V, pursuing his march, he was joined at
Shiraz by Soulat-ud-Eouleh and Fath-ul-Mulk • im
prisoned the Germans, Austrians and Turks. Publicly
blew from a gun two of his father’s servants who had
handed the treasury of their master to the rebels, and
also had two of the Gendarmerie officers hanged.
Opposed at first appointment of Farman Farma ?s
Governor General in autumn 1916, but finally vent to
meet him and Col. Gough H. M. Consul at Zarkhun.
On fairly good terms with Genl. Sykes and b. F. K.
officers and received from them valuable support m
the subjection of the Khamseh tribes 1917, when ne
defeated the Baharlu chiefs and hung a number of his
disobedient tribesmen. Received a subsidy and in
demnity for losses from H. M. 9° ve / nm f nt : Q1 Q Ven T^ p ^
a tour of pleasure to India with his farmly 1919.
to meet H. I. M. Ahmad Shah at Bushire 1920, accom
panying the Governor-General Farman arma,
as Basra. In November 1920 was inducecl b ' tb 6
Governor-General, Musaddiq-us-Sultaneh, a "4 ,
Mulk to come to a friendly understanding ,
ud-Douleh Qashqai. On disbandment of S. P• R• ^
militarj power had been a moral bac in g J qqq
pressed the Government in Tehran to agree to 1 000
of the men and officers being retained for a Fare for^,
but unsuccessfully. Throughout 1 ^ ^ Douleh
of 1922 on very strained terms with Soulat-ud-Oou^
owing to raids at the latter s ms rue 10 , • j^ | s
property, and to his owa jport ^
opposed to Sonlat-ud_Douleh. D | tcr o[ w „ to
fluence owing to 11 su PP ort r , gl yf r ^ of Southern Division
latter and compelled by G. 0. • t t Soulat-
and special officers sent from Tehran to m ^ ^
ud-Douleh for a nominal reconciliat ado pted
1922. In 1923 much worried by the .attitude ^a
towards him by the entrusted by British
Sirto^Vattr-d entered his elder son