Skip to item: of 385
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

Coll 28/22 ’Persia; Relations with H.M.G. Persian Debt to H.M.G.’ [‎89v] (178/385)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 file (191 folios). It was created in 12 Jun 1931-1 Mar 1940. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

(6) Cession to Persia of wireless station at Hen jam and wireless apparatus
at Bushire and Lingah.
(7) Removal of British Residency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, established in the provinces and regions considered part of, or under the influence of, British India. from Bushire.
o. The concessions offered to the Persian Government, as enumerated in
the preceding paragraph, are in point of fact of less importance than at first
sight appears. The Persian Government, for example, have no intention of
repaying the war and post-war debt, which they consider was spent in British
rather than Persian interests at a time when British troops were in occupation
of the country, and which ought, so the Persian Minister of Court maintains,
to be regarded as British war expenditure. The British claim to Basidu is
legally so weak that it could not he maintained if seriously challenged by Persia.
Again, it is not possible for His Majesty’s Government and the Government of
India to do other than hand over to Persia the Persian section of the Duzdab
Railway, built during the war on Persian territory without Persia’s consent.
It is clear that the Persian Minister of Court would prefer a more spectacular
success than that which he would obtain through a settlement by which Persia
obtained merely the concessions set forth above. It is for this reason that he has
raised the question of the withdrawal of the British naval depot from Henjam.
6. Henjam, however, is not the only point on which Teymourtache is raising
difficulties. He refuses to abandon the Persian claim to Bahrein. There is no
indication that he is prepared to abandon the similar claims to Tamb and Abu
Musa, or that he will be prepared to agree to a satisfactory claims article. The
one and only advantage which he now holds out as an inducement to His Majesty’s
Government to conclude a treaty is the possibility of an extension of the
permission for Imperial Airways to operate the Soutii Persian air route.
7. As regards the air route, His Majesty’s Government have carefully
endeavoured hitherto to avoid giving Teymourtache the impression that they
are entirely dependent upon Persia for the continuance of the British civil air
route to India. In Sir John Simon’s opinion it is important to continue to take
this line. If Teymourtache is given reason to believe that the Persian air route
is a question of vital importance to His Majesty’s Government, there can be no
doubt that he will refuse to give them satisfaction as regards Bahrein, Tamb, or
Abu Musa, or, indeed, as regards any of the other points in the general treaty.
Moreover, even if His Majesty's Government were to agree to accept the air route
as the only tangible advantage to be derived by them from the treaty, they can
have no guarantee that the Persian Government would thereafter carry out the
spirit, as well as the letter, of their obligation; there can be no effective guarantee
to prevent them from cancelling Imperial Airways’ concession at anv time on the
pretext that the company have failed to abide by the conditions of their contract.
Finally, the Secretary of State feels strongly that the acceptance of the Persian
proposal would form an undesirable precedent; that it would become known,
not o^ly in Persia, but also in other countries, that political concessions could be
extracted from His Majesty’s Government as the price of a permit to operate
air services over foreign territory; and that exactly similar difficulties would
arise with the Persian Government when Imperial Airways’ new contract
eventually expired.
8. Sir John Simon therefore feels that, as regards the air route, Mr. Hoare
should receive instructions to take the line that this question is not one of those
which was to have been dealt with in the general treaty; that if the Persian
Government are finally determined to close to international traffic the only
i oute aci oss I ersia, His Majesty s Government have no intention of
offering them any political concessions to induce them to change their decision,
hut will, if necessary, make alternative arrangements for avoiding Persian
territory altogether until the Persian Government are willing to adopt a less
unreasonable and obstructive attitude towards this question. Mr. Hoare would,
however, make it clear that, so long as any international aviation is allowed to
operate this, or any other, route across Persia, His Majesty’s Government
naturally expect that Imperial Airways will he allowed to do so on the same terms
9 As regards Henjam, the Secretary of State has long been of the opinion
that the Persian Government would shortly seek to bring about the withdrawal
ot the British depot. At the same time, the sudden change of front on the part
of the Minister of Court, after negotiations for a lease have been in progress
with him for some years, is most unsatisfactory, and it might at first sio-ht appear

About this item

Content

Correspondence concerning the Persian Government’s desire, signalled in June 1931, to pay off in full a pre-war interest-bearing debt owed to Britain, totalling £490,000. Correspondence is chiefly exchanged between the Foreign Office (Charles William Baxter, George William Rendel), the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. (John Gilbert Laithwaite), the Treasury (Thomas Kenneth Bewley), and the British Legation at Tehran (Charles Dodd), and covers:

  • The wording of a formal response to be given to the Persian Government, that does not comprise or jeopardise the outstanding (post-war) debt of £1,510,000 remaining to be paid.
  • The nature of the servicing of the debt and its interest.
  • In late August 1931, the Persian Ministry of Finance’s decision to abandon service of the debt, and continue payment of interest on the debt at seven per cent.
  • In 1932, the Persian Ministry of Finance’s reversal of their earlier decision to abandon servicing of the debt.
  • In June 1933, confirmation via the Imperial Bank of Persia of the full servicing of the pre-war debt.
  • India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. correspondence dated October 1933, enclosing a provisional draft of instructions for a General Treaty between Britain and Persia, making mention of the outstanding debt owed by Persia to Britain (ff 16-34).

The file contains two letters in French (f 42, f 47), sent by the Treasury General of the Persian Ministry of Finance.

Extent and format
1 file (191 folios)
Arrangement

The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the file.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the inside front cover with 1, and terminates at the last folio with 192; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.

A previous foliation sequence, which is also circled, has been superseded and therefore crossed out.

Written in
English and French in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

Coll 28/22 ’Persia; Relations with H.M.G. Persian Debt to H.M.G.’ [‎89v] (178/385), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/12/3419, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100041980874.0x0000b5> [accessed 10 May 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100041980874.0x0000b5">Coll 28/22 ’Persia; Relations with H.M.G. Persian Debt to H.M.G.’ [&lrm;89v] (178/385)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100041980874.0x0000b5">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000602.0x0003cc/IOR_L_PS_12_3419_0181.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000602.0x0003cc/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image