Skip to item: of 154
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

Coll 28/62 ‘Persia. Soviet commercial penetration in:’ [‎72v] (146/154)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 file (74 folios). It was created in 10 Oct 1932-21 Feb 1945. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

I
distributes them. From start to finish every factor in the cost of production is
absolutely controlled by a gigantic organisation that is a law unto itself, and for
whom, so long as the object in view be achieved, the immediate commercial loss
involved is of little importance. Such competition is backed by the combined and
co-ordinate resources of the whole State. Against it the individualistic and
disunited trade organisations of the capitalist State cannot hope to compete. /—s
It has been said, by way of consolation, that the strength of Russian
competition in South Persia is based on artificial factors which cannot be
indefinitely maintained. With their removal, orthodox trade will be quick to
recover lost ground. This view may have had much to support it in the earlier
days of the attack, when there seemed every reason to suppose that Russian goods
were being dumped in Southern Persia and sold regardless of the loss involved.
At the present time their methods have assumed a far more normal business
/ispect, and, in view of the concrete advantages afforded them over all
competition by the 1931 Trade Agreement, there seems every prospect of their
being able henceforward to hold the position acquired, and to extend it at will,
if not profitably, at least at no very great expense.
The outlook cannot be said to be in the least reassuring. The future of
Soviet foreign trade is presumably largely dependent on the measure of success
attained by the present schemes for the industrialisation of Russia. Perhaps
their achievement may automatically bring about a contraction of Russian exports
of which the underlying cause is the pressing need of the Soviet Government for
the foreign exchange essential to the execution of those schemes, and which, with
their consummation, will presumably automatically cease. Perhaps, also, the
frantic efforts of the Soviet authorities to make of Russia in a few years an
industrially independent unit may utterly break down.
As regards the first alternative, it may at once be said that Russian exports
to Southern Persia, though undoubtedly partaking of the nature of forced
exports, in that textiles and sugar are both commodities of which there is a
famine in Moscow, do not now appear to be contributing, or to be intended to
contribute, to the Soviet Government’s supplies of foreign exchange. Their
} motive may therefore be assumed to be political, and success of the Soviet
industrial "policy, far from resulting in a release of the economic pressure now
exerted, may consequently be expected to result in its intensification and
extension. The menace under such circumstances is no longer confined to British
commercial interests in Persia alone, but becomes a challenge of the first
magnitude to the trade supremacy of Britain in the Gulf as a whole, the under
mining of which may be expected to constitute one of the earliest objectives of a
successfully industrialised Russia.
\ The second alternative would appear rather in the nature of a hope than of a
probability. The first Five-Year Plan may not have achieved the standard set,
but it cannot be said to have failed. In 'spite of two unpremeditated adverse
factors of the first import, namely, the destruction by Russian peasants of
25 per cent, of the country's live-stock in the early days of the plan, and, secondly,
the unprecedented slump of raw material prices on world markets, achievement
has come within measurable distance of the objective. With the help of American
engineers and machinery, Russia is arming herself with industrial weapons of
the first order. Will she be able to use them? Are the huge industrial cities
springing up like mushroom growths all over the country destined to become
derelict monuments testifying to the failure of the greatest social experiment ever
attempted ? Do the leaders of the State possess the ability to evolve in Russia a
new order eventually capable of standing without the support of ruthless force ?
If so, then the prospect of a Russian State possessed of boundless natural
resources, exploiting those resources with the labour potentialities of a rigidly
controlled population of 180 millions, and animated by a fieice fanaticism tor a
social creed such as has formerly characterised only great religious movements,
introduces factors of world-wide significance and limitless possibilities.
But the Russian Colossus has never yet achieved results commensurate with
its size. Will the mountain once more bring forth a mouse ?

About this item

Content

The first part of the file (ff 52-75) contains correspondence dated 1932, exchanged between: HM’s Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary A diplomatic representative who ranks below an ambassador. The term can be shortened to 'envoy'. in Tehran, Reginald Hervey Hoare; John Gilbert Laithwaite of the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. ; George William Rendel of the Foreign Office; Cecil Claude Farrer of the Department of Overseas Trade. The correspondence is in response to a memorandum entitled ‘Economic characteristics of Russian trade with the South of Persia compared with British’, written by the Probationer Vice-Consul at Bushire, J W Blanch (ff 71-72).

The second part of the file (ff 23-51) contains correspondence dated 1933, exchanged between: HM’s Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary A diplomatic representative who ranks below an ambassador. The term can be shortened to 'envoy'. in Tehran; the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. ; the Foreign Office. The correspondence concerns the need for clear and regular despatches from Tehran on commercial relations between Soviet Russia and Persia. This part of the file contains a memorandum entitled ‘Effects of the Persian Trade Monopoly Laws and the Perso-Soviet Treaty upon Soviet commercial penetration in Persia’ (ff 34-40). The memorandum is undated and its author not stated. However, it bears annotations made by George Edmund Crombie of the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. , which are dated 3 March 1933.

The third part of the file (ff 2-22) contains a letter dated 15 December 1926 enclosing two notes (also 1926) written by Reginald Teague-Jones. The notes were forwarded, in 1945, by John Walter Hose, formerly of the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. , to Roland Tennyson Peel of the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. . The notes are entitled ‘Soviet Commercial Policy in Persia’ (ff 5-14) and ‘The Crucial Problem in Soviet Russia’ (ff 15-22). The accompanying letter (f 4) is signed under Teague-Jones’s pseudonym Ronald Sinclair.

The file includes a divider, which gives a list of correspondence references contained in the file by year. This is placed at the back of the correspondence.

Extent and format
1 file (74 folios)
Arrangement

The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the file.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the inside back cover with 76; these numbers are written in pencil and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

Coll 28/62 ‘Persia. Soviet commercial penetration in:’ [‎72v] (146/154), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/12/3470A, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100054939074.0x000093> [accessed 4 May 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100054939074.0x000093">Coll 28/62 ‘Persia. Soviet commercial penetration in:’ [&lrm;72v] (146/154)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100054939074.0x000093">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000648.0x000018/IOR_L_PS_12_3470A_0146.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000648.0x000018/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image