Skip to item: of 644
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

Coll 28/67 ‘Persia. Annual Reports, 1932–’ [‎260r] (519/644)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 file (320 folios). It was created in 6 Dec 1933-27 Mar 1947. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

5
them as having a free hand in the matter. The Persian Government agreed to get
rid of the five missions, and stopped their cypher and bag facilities at once; but
they were so dilatory in their preparations for the departure of the missions
that the Allies decided to move troops to the capital as the only means of securing
this object without dangerous delay. The troops arrived in the suburbs of Tehran
(they never occupied the town itself) on the morning of the 16th September. The
British troops camped on the south, the Russians on the other three sides of the
town. In the course of the exchange of letters the Persian Government obtained
permission to station Persian troops at certain points in the British zone of
occupation (not in the Russian), but they tried in vain to secure the immediate
return of war material captured during the hostilities and a promise of compensa
tion for war damage. Although these letters were set aside by the occupation of
Tehran and the negotiations for the conclusion of a treaty, they set the tone for
the mutual relations of His Majesty’s Government and the Persian Government
for the rest of the year.
11. The British zone of occupation, as defined in the exchange of letters, was
to be bounded by a line running north and east of Kermanshah and Kurramabad
and of the oilfields of Masjid-i-Sulaiman, Haftkel and Gach Saran, and ending
at Bandar Dulaim, on the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. ; but British troops were already in
occupation of Hamadan, the Aveh Pass and Sultanabad when the negotiations
began, and these points remained in our occupation after the troops which were
sent to occupy the suburbs of the capital had been withdrawn. The limits of the
Russian occupation (apart from the period when the Russian troops were at
Tehran) have been as defined in the letters : the line runs from Ushni through
Zenjan to Qazvin, then up to the Caspian, whose southern shore it follows, then
through Babul, Zirab, Semnan and Shahrud and north to Aliabad, on the frontier.
There is, however, one exception to this : at the last moment the Russians
added to their definition an oral statement that, while Meshed would not be
occupied, a certain number of aeroplanes, with ground troops to protect them,
would be stationed outside Meshed. This was an important rider, since the
presence of Russian troops so near naturally affected the administration of
Meshed, the centre of an important province.
12. Even before the Allied entry into Persia it had been debated whether it
paid us any longer to support Reza Shah to the extent we had done in the past,
viz., by discouraging the publication in the British press of any matter
disparaging him or his regime. His Majesty’s Government fully realised that the
popular belief, that we maintained him on the throne for our own ends, did us
great harm, but they considered that his remarkable hold over his people
warranted his retention on the throne so long as we could hope to secure his
co-operation, or at least his real neutrality. His obstinate refusal to get rid of
the Axis nationals with reasonable speed had already shaken our hopes when
the Allied occupation showed that he was quite incapable of dealing with the
problems of the moment. When his parade army collapsed he made no effort
to prevent disintegration. Moreover, he showed no consciousness of responsibility
for the collapse of his pretentious military fagade, or of recognition of the urgent
need for reform : even after the occupation he one day beat the Minister of Warjj X
and the Chief of Staff with his sword for putting up a scheme of which hej
disapproved, and threw them into prison, and he would probably have had them
executed if he had not had to abdicate. Meanwhile our position had grown worse,
since whereas the Persians expected that we should at least save them from the
Shah’s tyranny as compensation for invading their country, they found that they
now had to bear both the foreign occupation and the Shah. The new Prime
Minister, Mr. Fimmhi, though he realised that it would be impossible to find a
successor to Reza who would wield the same authority, eventually came to the
conclusion that the reforms which were essential could not be secured under Reza
Shah, since, even if he promised to accept a programme of reform, he would
soon return to his old arbitrary ways and penalise the authors of the programme.
His Majesty’s Government thereupon agreed that the B.B.C. might now begin
to give various broadcasts in Persian which had been prepared beforehand,
starting with talks on constitutional government and increasing in strength
and local colour until all Reza’s mismanagement, greed and cruelty were displayed
to the public gaze. It is probable that no broadcasts have ever been received with
more excitement and approval than these. If the Persian public approved them,
to the Shah they gave a violent shock, and he made an unsuccessful appeal to

About this item

Content

Annual reports for Persia [Iran] produced by staff at the British Legation in Tehran. The reports were sent to the Foreign Office by HM’s Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary A diplomatic representative who ranks below an ambassador. The term can be shortened to 'envoy'. at Tehran (from 1943, Ambassador to Iran). The reports cover the following years: 1932 (ff 2-50); 1933 (ff 51-98); 1934 (ff 99-128); 1935 (ff 129-165); 1936 (ff 166-195); 1937 (ff 196-227); 1938 (ff 228-249); 1939 (ff 250-251); 1940 (ff 252-257); 1941 (ff 258-266); 1942 (ff 267-277); 1943 (ff 278-289); 1944 (ff 290-306); 1945 (ff 307-317); 1946 (ff 318-320).

The reports for 1932 to 1938 are comprehensive in nature (each containing their own table of contents), and cover: an introductory statement on affairs in Persia, with a focus on the Shah’s programme of modernisation across the country; an overview of foreign relations between Persia and other nations, including with the United Kingdom, British India, and Iraq; Persia’s involvement in international conventions and agreements, for example the League of Nations and the Slave Traffic Convention; British interests in or associated with Persia, including Bahrain and Bahrainis resident in Persia, the Residency An office of the East India Company and, later, of the British Raj, established in the provinces and regions considered part of, or under the influence of, British India. at Bushire, the Anglo-Persian Oil Company, Imperial Bank of Persia, and the Imperial and International Communications Company; political affairs in Persia, including court and officials, majlis, tribes and security; economic affairs in Persia (government finances and budgets, trade, industry, agriculture, opium production); communications (aviation, railways, roads); consular matters; military matters (army, navy, air force).

Reports from 1939 to 1946 are briefer in nature, Reports from 1941 onwards focusing on the Anglo-Soviet occupation of Persia, and the role of United States advisors in the Persian Government’s administration.

The file includes a divider, which gives a list of correspondence references contained in the file by year. This is placed at the back of the correspondence.

Extent and format
1 file (320 folios)
Arrangement

The file’s reports are arranged in chronological order from the front to the rear of the file. Each report for the years 1932-1938 begins with a table of contents referring to that report’s own printed pagination sequence.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the inside back cover with 321; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.

The file contains one foliation anomaly, f 308A

Pagination: Each of the reports included in the file has its own printed pagination system, commencing at 1 on the first page of the report.

Written in
English and French in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

Coll 28/67 ‘Persia. Annual Reports, 1932–’ [‎260r] (519/644), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/12/3472A, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100056661168.0x000078> [accessed 12 May 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100056661168.0x000078">Coll 28/67 ‘Persia. Annual Reports, 1932–’ [&lrm;260r] (519/644)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100056661168.0x000078">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000648.0x00001b/IOR_L_PS_12_3472A_0519.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000648.0x00001b/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image