Skip to item: of 340
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

Coll 30/36 'Bahrain: claim of Yusuf Lutfali Khunji a Persian subject against Shaikh Hamad in respect of an ice factory' [‎167r] (333/340)

The record is made up of 1 file (168 folios). It was created in 29 Dec 1930-15 Jun 1933. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

CONFIDENTIAL.
T r B. 422.
India Ollice
P. 1632/30.
Exercise of Jurisdiction in Cases affecting Foreign Subjects
in Bahrein by the British Political Authorities.
Jurisdiction over British Subjects.
1. Article 4 of the Convention of 1861 between the Sheikh of Bahrein
and the British Government provides that “ all offences which they {British
subjects) may commit, or which may be committed against them, shall be
reserved for the decisions of the British Resident, provided the British Agent
located at Bahrein shall fail to adjust them satisfactorily.”
Jurisdiction in Cases affecting- Foreigners.
2. By the Agreement of 22nd December 1880 and the Exclusive
Agreement of 13th March 1892, the Sheikh bound himself not to enter into
any agreement or correspondence with any Governments other than His
Majesty’s Government; not to allow the Agents of such Governments to
reside within his territory without the assent of His Majesty’s Government;
and not to alienate, mortgage, or give for occupation any part of his
territories save to His Majesty’s Government.
Responsibility for the protection of foreigners in Bahrein may be regarded
as having passed to His Majesty’s Government as a corollary to these two
Agreements. But the question of jurisdiction does not appear to have
arisen in an active form until 1900. In December of that year the
Assistant Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. , Bahrein, reported that a German subject,
Mr. Wonckhaus, intended to open a branch of his business in Bahrein. The
Political Resident A senior ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul General) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Residency. suggested that, in the event of any mercantile or other
cases arising between Bahreini subjects and Mr. Wonckhaus or his agent, the
Assistant Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. should be instructed to deal with such cases as if
they were cases between British subjects and subjects of the Sheikh.
3. The Government of India informed the Political Resident A senior ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul General) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Residency. in reply
that “ Mr. Wonckhaus being a foreigner and not a protected person, the
Assistant Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. cannot claim any jurisdiction in such cases.
Mr. Wonckhaus and his agent, if a foreigner and not a native Indian subject
of His Majesty, must be regarded as liable in such cases to the jurisdiction
of the Sheikh.
“ As, however, the Sheikh is bound, under treaty, not to admit the
consular agencies of other nations without the consent of the British
Government, it is expedient that the British representative should, as a
matter of courtesy, extend his good offices to European foreigners in any
disputes between them and the Chief of Bahrein,or his subjects, and, in the
event of necessity, he should claim to protect all such foreigners as he would
a British subject. I am to request that Mr. Gaskin may be instructed to
this effect.”
The action taken by the Government of India was subsequently approved
by His M ajesty’s Government.
4. In June 1903, the question having arisen of the purchase by Mr.
Wonckhaus of certain premises in Bahrein which he had hitherto held on a
temporary lease, the Government of India instructed the Political Resident A senior ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul General) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Residency.
as follows :—“ In view ... of the belief which Mr. Wonckhaus is reported
to hold that, in the event of his acquiring property, he will not be amenable
to local law, but will be subject to the extra-territorial jurisdiction of Courts
of his own country (though there are none such with local jurisdiction in
Bahrein), the Government of India approve your proposal to warn the Sheikh
of Bahrein that no such acquisition can give to any Consul or other
representative of a foreign nation the right to enter into direct relations with
the Chief, and that, should any such official address the Chief, he should be
referred to the British authorities. The position should also be clearly
explained to Mr. Wonckhaus.”
4371 75 3.30
Lr. d. 4 May 1901,
No. 708 E.A., end.
in G. of I. Desp. 72,
of 9 May 1901
P. 614/01.
Secret Desp. to
G. of I., No. 16, of
21 June 1901:
P. 2063/01.
Lr. from G. of I. to
Pol. Res., No. 1156
of 2 June 1903:
P. 845/03.

About this item

Content

This file contains papers relating to a legal dispute between Yusuf Lutfally Khunji and Shaikh Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa, the ruler of Bahrain. The case concerns a joint venture between the aforementioned parties to set up and operate an ice-making plant in Bahrain at a spring owned by Mr. Khunji in 1922. Following the expiration of a five year monopoly on the manufacture and sale of ice in Bahrain, the two parties fell into a dispute on the plant.

The majority of the papers consist of legal correspondence between Mr Khunji's lawyers in Manchester and either the Political Agent A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency. in Bahrain or the Financial Advisor to the Ruler of Bahrain, Charles Dalrymple Belgrave. Of note, however, are letters of intervention by the Foreign Minister of Iran through the Persian Legation in London, protesting the treatment of a Persian subject in British protected territory.

Extent and format
1 file (168 folios)
Arrangement

The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the rear to the front of the file.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the front cover with 1, and terminates at the inside back cover with 170; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

Coll 30/36 'Bahrain: claim of Yusuf Lutfali Khunji a Persian subject against Shaikh Hamad in respect of an ice factory' [‎167r] (333/340), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/12/3749, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100058813763.0x000086> [accessed 17 May 2024]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100058813763.0x000086">Coll 30/36 'Bahrain: claim of Yusuf Lutfali Khunji a Persian subject against Shaikh Hamad in respect of an ice factory' [&lrm;167r] (333/340)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100058813763.0x000086">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000648.0x00013a/IOR_L_PS_12_3749_0334.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000648.0x00013a/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image