Skip to item: of 544
Information about this record Back to top
Open in Universal viewer
Open in Mirador IIIF viewer

Papers of the War Cabinet's Eastern Committee [‎163r] (325/544)

This item is part of

The record is made up of 1 file (272 folios). It was created in 13 Mar 1918-7 Jan 1919. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .

Transcription

This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.

Apply page layout

Next, on the 20th November, comes Captain Wilson’s reply to Colonel Lawrence’s
views as telegraphed from here. Captain Wilson adheres to his former opinion and
emphasises tne absence of any connection between the rest of Arabia and Mesopo
tamia. He is dead against setting up any foreign puppet ruler, and he would
exclude Irak altogether from any settlement with the Sherifian family.
At our last meeting the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. put in a note,* which had not then been
read, by Sir Arthur Hirtzel, which brought this history up to date, ai\d on behalf
of the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. made the following recommendations. The India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. thought
that a British Protectorate was now probably impossible, and that, in these circum
stances, we ought to fight for the second of the two original alternatives of Sir Percy
Cox as accepted by us in the early part of the year, namely, British administration
behind a facade of native institutions. Sir A. Hirtzel did not recommend the intro
duction of the sons of King Hussein, and again quoted what Sir Percy Cox had said
about the Nakib. He was strongly averse from quarrelling with the French over
Syria, and thought that Captain Wilson should be authorised at once to start a
propaganda in favour of British administration over the united vilayets of Basra.
Baghdad, and Mosul.
Then finally there are two telegrams, one of them only of importance in relation
to something I said before with regard to the Commission that was proposed here,
and which we decided for the moment not to proceed with. Captain Wilson is
strongly against any Commission going out at the present time, because he says until
the future status and form of government of the country have been decided by refer
ence to public opinion, a Commission would merely consume time and do what was
not reouired.
Finally, we come to the telegram t dated the 24th November, which is the last
received from Captain Wilson. After himself thinking over the Anglo-French
Declaration, and after saying that the people at Baghdad have also been considering
it ami that he has been doing his best to ascertain public opinion, he represents edu
cated opinion as running on the following lines. With your permission, I will read
these statements, because it seems to me that they present, on the whole, the most
correct summary of the point at which we have now arrived:—
(1.) “ All reject idea of restoration of Turkish rule.” That is accepted
nem. con.
(2.) “ All reject idea of Arab kingdom without British advice, assistance,
or control.” I think that we are all agreed upon that.
(3.) “ None wishes for formal annexation by British Government.” That
reeristers a final abandonment of the idea of annexation. We are all agreed
upon that?. (“Yes.”) Then (1), (2), and (3) are accepted.
(4.) “All agree that an Arab State under an Arab Amir, including Basra,
Baghdad; and Mosul, is an ideal solution.”
Upon that also I think we are all agreed, although there may be a doubt as to who
the Amir should be.
LORD ROBERT CECIL: Subject to this, I think. I hold the opinion that you
might have a variation of that and have two lieutenants, one in Mosul and one in
Baghdad, under the nominal supreme headship of the Sherif.
LORD CURZON: Yes.
LORD ROBERT CECIL : That is a modification of it.
LORD CURZON : Yes. We will discuss that in a moment.
LORD ROBERT CECIL : That is the only criticism I have to make.
LORD CURZON : Then No. 5.
“ All are unanimous in asking for a British High Commissioner and
British adviser in all Ministries of the Arab State and throughout the country.
(6.) “All are unanimous in wishing Sir P. Cox to be first incumbent of
the post. This feeling is general, to my personal knowledge, all over Irak, par
ticularly in the country districts, where Sir P. Cox’s name carried greatest
weight, and in Najaf and Kerbela.” I
I suppose we are all agreed upon this, that whether you set up an Amir or not,
and whoever be the Amir, there must be a British High Commissioner ?
* E.C. 2454.
t E.C. 2486.

About this item

Content

This file is composed of papers produced by the War Cabinet's Eastern Committee, which was chaired by George Curzon for most of its existence. The file contains a complete set of printed minutes, beginning with the committee's first meeting on 28 March 1918, and concluding with its final meeting on 7 January 1919 (ff 6-214 and ff 227-272).

The file begins with two copies of a memorandum by Curzon, dated 13 March 1918, proposing the formation of the Eastern Committee. This is followed by a memorandum by Arthur James Balfour, Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, approving Curzon's proposal, and a copy of a procedure for the newly created committee, outlining arrangements for committee meetings and the dissemination of information to committee members.

Also included is a set of resolutions, passed by the committee in December 1918, in order to guide British representatives at the Paris Peace conference (ff 216-225). The resolutions cover the following: the Caucasus and Armenia; Syria; Palestine; Hejaz and Arabia; Mesopotamia, Mosul, Baghdad and Basra. They are preceded by a handwritten note written by Curzon 'some years later', which remarks on how they are a 'rather remarkable forecast of the bulk of the results since obtained.'

Extent and format
1 file (272 folios)
Arrangement

The papers are arranged in approximate chronological order from the front to the rear of the file.

Physical characteristics

Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the first folio with 1, and terminates at the last folio with 272; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.

Written in
English in Latin script
View the complete information for this record

Use and share this item

Share this item
Cite this item in your research

Papers of the War Cabinet's Eastern Committee [‎163r] (325/544), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F112/274, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100069672678.0x00007e> [accessed 30 June 2026]

Link to this item
Embed this item

Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.

<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100069672678.0x00007e">Papers of the War Cabinet's Eastern Committee [&lrm;163r] (325/544)</a>
<a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100069672678.0x00007e">
	<img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002a8/Mss Eur F112_274_0325.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
IIIF details

This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x0002a8/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images

Use and reuse
Download this image