File 4535/1928 Pt 8 ‘ – PERSIAN GULF – QUESTION OF ESTABLISHMENT OF PROTECTORATES OVER KOWEIT, BAHREIN, MUSCAT, TRUCIAL COAST.’ [80v] (154/194)
The record is made up of 1 item (96 folios). It was created in 8 Sep 1927-14 May 1929. It was written in English. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
C,0. to F.O., July 9 1921,
P. 3078/21.
F.O. to C.O., .Tuly 25 1921,
P. 3495/21.
Turkey renounced in favour of the principal Allied Powers all rights aiuf
title over territories outside Europe not otherwise disposed of by the Treaty ;
that, in practice, provided some prior agreement were reached with the
Sheikh of Koweit, it would appear unlikely that any Foreign Powers would
challenge the issue of an
Order in Council
A regulation issued by the sovereign of the United Kingdom on the advice of the Privy Council.
on the lines of the Bahrein Order-
in Council of 1913 (although the extension of British jurisdiction, as in that
order, to foreigners might involve the prior concurrence of some Foreign
Powers), but that, while the High Commissioner in Iraq might be authorised
to open negotiations with the Sheikh with a view to ascertaining the measure
of British supervision which His Excellency was prepared to accept, the
actual issue of an
Order in Council
A regulation issued by the sovereign of the United Kingdom on the advice of the Privy Council.
consolidating any agreement that might
be reached with the Sheikh should be postponed until the coming into force
of the Treaty of Peace with Turkey.
* Letter from F.O, to I.O.,
Mar. 3 1929. P. 808.
t G. of I. Notification of
1916. Sept. 25 1925,
P. 3434/25.
^ Letter from (I. of I. to
I.O.. 210 M., Jan. 21 1926,
P. 488'26.
26. No further action was taken until the Treaty of Lausanne had beem
signed and, owing to the necessity for departmental examination of the
provisions of the Order, the approval of His Majesty to an
Order in Council
A regulation issued by the sovereign of the United Kingdom on the advice of the Privy Council.
was not finally obtained until 17th March 1925. Under the Order in
question jurisdiction over British subjects and protected persons, the-
subjects and protected persons of non-Moslem foreign Governments, and
Koweit subjects or the subjects of other Moslem Governments registered in
the Office of the
Political Agent
A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency.
as being regularly employed by British
subjects or subjects of non-Moslem foreign Governments, was vested in the
Political Agent
A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency.
subject to the general control of, and a right of appeal to,
the
Political Resident
A senior ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul General) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Residency.
in the
Persian Gulf
The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran.
. It may be noted* that, no-
foreign Power having consented to the exercise of jurisdiction over its
nationals in Koweit by His Majesty, the
Political Agent
A mid-ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Agency.
was instructed, at
the request of the Foreign Office, that, in the event of a national of a non-
Moslem Power committing some crime or misdemeanour necessitating
proceedings against him, or of such a person becoming involved in civil
proceedings, the matter should at once be brought to the notice of His
Majesty’s Government who, on learning that such a case had arisen, would
take steps to ascertain from the Government of the person concerned whether
they desired that the case should be dealt with under the Koweit Order in
Council. The
Order in Council
A regulation issued by the sovereign of the United Kingdom on the advice of the Privy Council.
came into force in the 1st October 1925,|
but the concurrence of the Sheikh in the delegation of jurisdiction over the
classes of person in question was not finally obtained until November 19254
Since that date various Rules of Court and King’s Regulations have been
issued under the Koweit
Order in Council
A regulation issued by the sovereign of the United Kingdom on the advice of the Privy Council.
, but no point of importance has
arisen in connection with its operation.
Uetter from C.O. to I.O.,
.Lin. 20 1925, 1’. 201/25 and
V. 1101/25.
27. It may be recorded that, a clearer understanding as to responsibility,
as between the interested Departments of His Majesty’s Government, for the
internal administration of Koweit having been reached by that stage, the
preparation and issue of the
Order in Council
A regulation issued by the sovereign of the United Kingdom on the advice of the Privy Council.
of 1925 were, by agreement
with the Colonial Office, left to be dealt with by the
India Office
The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors.
in
conjunction with the foreign Office.
Viceroy to S. of S., tel.
427 S.,' April 13 1920,
P. 2927/20.
Tel. from H.C., Baghdad,
to S. of S. for I., It. 97 S.,
Dec. 19 1920, P. 9001/20.
Tel. from H.C. to S.S. for I.,
88, Mey 8 1921. P. 2489/21.
(b) The Bunder Shweikh Lease.
28. The question of terminating the lease of Bunder Shweikh, the earlier
history of which is given in the Foreign Office Memorandum of 1908, and
the engagements entered into in connection with which by His Majesty’s
Government are shown in the Precis of Treaties appended to the present
Memorandum, came up for consideration on the conclusion of the War.
After considerable correspondence during 1919-20, the Government of India
recommended in April 1920 that the lease should be terminated as the Sheikh
had maintained a consistently obstructive attitude towards His Majesty’s
Government. Uncertainty as to the status of Koweit under the Peace Treaty,
and consideration of the political effect on the Sheikh of withdrawal of the
subsidv which the rent of Bunder Shweikh in fact constituted, of the
possibility of bringing pressure to bear on His Excellency in other ways,
and of the question of retaining the site at a reduced rent, &c., prevented a
decision before the death of Sheikh Salim in February 1921. His Majesty’s
Government subsequently decided in consultation with the Government of
India to terminate the lease of the Bunder Shweikh lands, while agreeing,
About this item
- Content
This part contains papers relating to the question of whether Koweit [Kuwait], Bahrein [Bahrain], Muscat, and the Trucial Coast A name used by Britain from the nineteenth century to 1971 to refer to the present-day United Arab Emirates. Sheikdoms should become formal British protectorates, including the views on this question of the following: the Political Resident A senior ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul General) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Residency. in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. ; HM Minister at Tehran (Sir Robert Clive); the Government of India; the Colonial Office; the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. ; and the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. Sub-Committee of the Committee of Imperial Defence.
This part also includes papers relating to the question of the terms of a draft article for inclusion in a treaty with Persia [Iran] regarding the status of Bahrain.
The papers include correspondence, India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. memoranda, India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Political Department minute papers, and Committee of Imperial Defence Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. Sub-Committee papers.
The main correspondents are the India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. , the Government of India Foreign and Political Department, and the Political Resident A senior ranking political representative (equivalent to a Consul General) from the diplomatic corps of the Government of India or one of its subordinate provincial governments, in charge of a Political Residency. in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. (Lieutenant-Colonel Lionel Berkeley Holt Haworth).
- Extent and format
- 1 item (96 folios)
- Written in
- English in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
File 4535/1928 Pt 8 ‘ – PERSIAN GULF – QUESTION OF ESTABLISHMENT OF PROTECTORATES OVER KOWEIT, BAHREIN, MUSCAT, TRUCIAL COAST.’ [80v] (154/194), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, IOR/L/PS/10/1271/1, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100069905656.0x0000a6> [accessed 12 July 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100069905656.0x0000a6
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100069905656.0x0000a6">File 4535/1928 Pt 8 ‘ – PERSIAN GULF – QUESTION OF ESTABLISHMENT OF PROTECTORATES OVER KOWEIT, BAHREIN, MUSCAT, TRUCIAL COAST.’ [‎80v] (154/194)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100069905656.0x0000a6"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000466.0x0002a1/IOR_L_PS_10_1271_00165.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000000466.0x0002a1/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- IOR/L/PS/10/1271/1
- Title
- File 4535/1928 Pt 8 ‘ – PERSIAN GULF – QUESTION OF ESTABLISHMENT OF PROTECTORATES OVER KOWEIT, BAHREIN, MUSCAT, TRUCIAL COAST.’
- Pages
- 4r:100v
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
![File 4535/1928 Pt 8 ‘ – PERSIAN GULF – QUESTION OF ESTABLISHMENT OF PROTECTORATES OVER KOWEIT, BAHREIN, MUSCAT, TRUCIAL COAST.’ [‎80v] (154/194) File 4535/1928 Pt 8 ‘ – PERSIAN GULF – QUESTION OF ESTABLISHMENT OF PROTECTORATES OVER KOWEIT, BAHREIN, MUSCAT, TRUCIAL COAST.’ [‎80v] (154/194)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000000466.0x0002a1/IOR_L_PS_10_1271_00165.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)