Papers on British policy and the Arab movement [10r] (21/380)
The record is made up of 1 file (187 folios). It was created in 1 Jul 1916-7 Dec 1918. It was written in English and French. The original is part of the British Library: India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. Records and Private Papers Documents collected in a private capacity. .
Transcription
This transcription is created automatically. It may contain errors.
n:
19
4 9
secular character. We regarded the Khaldate as a thing which should be settled
\ by Moslems for themselves, and in which neither we nor any non-Moslem Power
should interfere.’’
1 he Aga Khan expressed himself quite satisfied, but asked that, in all communi
cations with the Arabs, His Majesty’s Government’s attitude should be made v ery clear.
A record of this conversation was transmitted to Sir H. McMahon and Sir R. Wingate.
On the 17th November, 1915, after receiving from Sir H. McMahon a revised
summary of the Sherif’s third letter of the 5th November, 1915, the Foreign Office
telegraphed to the former (No. 8S7) 07 :—
“ You will, of course, bear carefully in mind the necessity of avoiding all
possibility of being involved in any questions concerning the C;diphate.”
1 he subject was accordingly ignored by Sir H. McMahon in the subsequent
negotiations.
Sherif Husein, however, gave a clearer indication of his policy on the question in
his letter of the ‘28th December, 1915, to Sir Ali Morghani 83 :—
“ I had not claimed before to be the qualified chief of the Amirs (the Caliph),
but 1 explained to them more than once that 1 was ready to extend my hand to
any man who would come forward and take the reins of authority. I was,
however, chosen in every quarter and even forced to take up the question of their
future prospects; and, therefore, I can see no ground for making (further)
conditions, such as the universal agreement of the Amirs and tribes which were
mentioned, especially the ‘ Shias,’ i.e., the Persians, who lack the necessary
qualifications and every other right (to decide the question of the chosen Caliph
of Islam)” (p. 118).
The above passage lends significance to the declaration contained in the address
presented to Sherif Husein on the 29th October, 1916, by the “Ministers, Notables,
Inhabitants and Ulema of Mecca,” 69 to the effect that “We take the oath of
obedience, loyalty and sincerity to Husein bin Ali, and consider him also to be our
religious leader until all the Moslem world be of one opinion concerning the Islamic
Caliphate.” And Sherif Abdullah emphasised this declaration in his short telegram of
the 29th October, 1916, to Colonel Wilson, announcing the proclamation of his father
as king.
In conversation over the telephone with Colonel Wilson on the 1st November,
1916, 70 Abdullah explained that:—
“His Majesty the Sherif has left the question of the Caliphate to the opinion
of the Moslem world, and, therefore, he declared that there was no pre-suggested
Caliphate, but that the whole question is left to the public opinion of Islam, and
the Ulema of the Qibla decided not to accept the Turkish Caliphate, and the
whole question will come back later on to its origin.”
In a similar conversation on the following day, King Husein himself declared:—
“ I have denied the Caliphate entirely and officially, leaving it to the opinion
of those who know all about its regulations, until all Moslems choose one person
to be their Caliph
“ I repeat that our not declaring the Caliphate will not put us in any
suspicion, until all Moslems are of one opinion, it is a question of dissociating
the Moslems from the Turks.”
On the 6th November, 1916, the Foreign Office telegraphed instructions to
Sir R. Wingate for a reply to Abdullah’s communication 71 ; and in this telegram
His Majesty’s Government’s policy regarding the Caliphate was once more laid down,
as follows :—
“ That it should be strongly impressed on the Sherif that his own interests
require that the question of the Caliphate should be left open until the end of the
war ; that it would be quite impossible for Christian Powers, numbering among their
subjects many millions of Moslems, to expose themselves to the charge of taking
sides in the affairs of Islam and forcibly supporting one Caliph against another,
and that his claims could only be weakened by such support in the eyes of the
Moslem world.”
67 172416/15. 6 » 30674/16.
233117/16; see also 249121/16 (extract from “A1 Qibla ”> 70 242002/16. 71 221869/16.
&
About this item
- Content
This file contains correspondence, memoranda, maps, manuscript notes, and other papers relating to the political and territorial settlement of parts of the Middle East following the First World War. Many of the papers were collected for the attention of the Middle East Committee (later named the Eastern Committee, following the mergence of the Foreign Office's Russia Committee and the interdepartmental Persia Committee) of the War Cabinet. Contributors include officials from the War Office, Foreign Office, Admiralty, and India Office The department of the British Government to which the Government of India reported between 1858 and 1947. The successor to the Court of Directors. , as well as indivduals such as Lieutenant-Colonel Thomas Edward Lawrence. Correspondence comes from representatives of the French and Italian governments as well as British officials in Cairo and other parts of the Middle East.
The papers deal with plans for the region presuming and following an Allied victory in the First World War and take into consideration the imperial ambitions of the victorious European Powers (France, Italy, Russia, Britain, and the United States) and the multitudinous commitments made by the British to various groups. The plans are based on evolving agreements rooted in the Sykes-Picot, or Asia Minor, Agreement between the British and French of 1916. Regions under consideration include the Hejaz (sometimes written Hedjaz), Syria, Northern Iraq, Southern Iraq, Palestine, Armenia, Turkey, the Idrisi state, Yemen, Persia, and Afghanistan. Various matters are covered in the file, but particular focus is given to plans for the Sherifian family of the Hejaz, led by King Husein [Ḥusayn bin ‘Alī al-Hāshimī], which impacted upon policy in Mesopotamia, Syria, Palestine, and the Arabian Peninsula. Other matters include the situation between Jews and Arabs in Palestine, wartime commitments to ruling shaikhs in the Persian Gulf The historical term used to describe the body of water between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran. , the French position in the region, and desiderata of the Government of India for any peace settlement.
- Extent and format
- 1 file (187 folios)
- Arrangement
The file is arranged in chronological order from the front to the back.
- Physical characteristics
Foliation: the foliation sequence (used for referencing) commences at the front first page with 1, and terminates at the inside back last page with 187; these numbers are written in pencil, are circled, and are located in the top right corner of the recto The front of a sheet of paper or leaf, often abbreviated to 'r'. side of each folio.
- Written in
- English and French in Latin script View the complete information for this record
Use and share this item
- Share this item
Papers on British policy and the Arab movement [10r] (21/380), British Library: India Office Records and Private Papers, Mss Eur F112/277, in Qatar Digital Library <https://www.qdl.qa/archive/81055/vdc_100079857498.0x000016> [accessed 7 June 2026]
https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100079857498.0x000016
Copy and paste the code below into your web page where you would like to embed the image.
<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100079857498.0x000016">Papers on British policy and the Arab movement [‎10r] (21/380)</a> <a href="https://www.qdl.qa/en/archive/81055/vdc_100079857498.0x000016"> <img src="https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x00028b/Mss Eur F112_277_0021.jp2/full/!280,240/0/default.jpg" alt="" /> </a>
This record has a IIIF manifest available as follows. If you have a compatible viewer you can drag the icon to load it.https://www.qdl.qa/en/iiif/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x00028b/manifestOpen in Universal viewerOpen in Mirador viewerMore options for embedding images
Copyright: How to use this content
- Reference
- Mss Eur F112/277
- Title
- Papers on British policy and the Arab movement
- Pages
- 1ar:1av, 1r:14r, 14r:14v, 14v, 22r:59v, 62r:98r, 99v:120v, 125r:133v, 136r:165r, 166r:167r, 167av, 168r:173r, 175r:176v, 178r:187v
- Author
- East India Company, the Board of Control, the India Office, or other British Government Department
- Usage terms
- Open Government Licence
![Papers on British policy and the Arab movement [‎10r] (21/380) Papers on British policy and the Arab movement [‎10r] (21/380)](https://iiif.qdl.qa/iiif/images/81055/vdc_100000001491.0x00028b/Mss Eur F112_277_0021.jp2/full/!1200,1200/0/default.jpg)